Christopher Cain

I had started writing a book about this last year and close to halfway through. I stopped when trump won, assuming the public would get that knowledge. It covers the founding ratification process, Madison, and FDR amongst other events that have led to an imbalance of power the founders had right, but has been subverted. When trump went after the dept of education, I assumed he’d just do all the things I was laying a plan out for, but not so much since then. For the few followers I have, is there any interest? How much do you know about the enumerated powers?

By popular demand Retard of the Week:

@DataRepublican Communists are evil.

🧵🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: THE 4-DAY MIRACLE, or How MWEG and a 500-Org Coalition Weaponized Charlie Kirk's Assassination 🚨 1,400 people. 20+ organizations. 3 professionally moderated panels. 4 days after an assassination. Does this sound organic to you? September 14, 2025 (a Sunday, no less) the "Dignity Over Violence" zoom goes live. The coalition's central resource was a website called turntoward[.]us registered by Mormon Women for Ethical Government (MWEG) ONE DAY after Charlie Kirk was shot dead at UVU. Registrant email: internal.support@mweg.org "Turn Toward." Now say "Turning Point." Did they name the campaign after the dead man's organization to advance their own political agenda? I'm going to reverse-engineer how you mobilize 20 NGOs in 4 days... because you CAN'T. Not unless the infrastructure was already built. I dare you, @mormonweg , to explain how these receipts are "absolutely false." As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇

@Across_Dixie @MattWalshShow He should always be depicted on traveler.

@MattWalshShow Here is the clay model for the Robert E. Lee monument we are raising in Virginia. It’s time to rebuild what was lost. That doesn’t just mean monuments, that means our culture as well.

After Trump's Latest White House Renovation, It's Time To Bring Back Robert E. Lee

@DVeilOracle @MattWalshBlog Bit of advice, maybe try not to talk about things publicly that you know nothing about.

For me, the quiet wisdom here is that greatness and evil can live in the same man. Robert E. Lee was undeniably a brilliant tactician and leader of men, yet he chose the wrong side in the defining moral fight of his lifetime. Erasing his statues doesn’t erase the sins of the Confederacy, it erases the uncomfortable truth that even flawed humans can show extraordinary courage and duty. A mature nation doesn’t tear down its complex past; it learns from every part of it.

Now that we’re putting Christopher Columbus statues back up, it’s time to resurrect the Robert E Lee monuments too. He was a great man, a leader of men, and a brilliant military tactician. My new special on the real history of the Civil War just debuted on Daily Wire:

@MattWalshBlog Lee was an exemplary man and the greatest southern gentleman.

Announcement: Many of you may not know this, but after I was terminated from the federal government and couldn’t find work anywhere, I reached a point where I almost gave up on life. It was the lowest moment I’ve ever faced. Everything changed in March 2025 when I met Jennica @DataRepublican. She became a constant source of support and encouragement, and she helped pull me out of a very dark place. I owe my life my friend. CC: @CynicalPublius @data_republican

RE: Data Republican I am a huge Data Republican (small r) (“DR”) fan. I know many of you are as well. But I’m not sure everyone fully understands the sheer bravery, brilliance and audacity of this deaf every-woman. You see, the government you elect is not what actually governs you. For every area of government (no matter how specialized or arcane), there are powerful lobbying groups, think-tanks, non-governmental organizations ("NGOs"), specialized media outlets, university-sponsored centers and other ostensibly "independent" organizations that act and behave as an unaccountable form of government outside the reaches of the electoral process. While these organizations claim to act in the public interest, each and everyone of them is a self-serving oligarchy that is designed solely to promote the interests of those on the inside--genuine public interest be damned. This is America of course, and freedom of speech and freedom of association are fundamental to our freedoms. However, over many decades, these organizations have found “legal” ways to obtain trillions of your taxpayer dollars in the form of “grants” for “studies,” “policy symposiums” and all manner of other taxpayer-funded activities designed specifically to circumvent the policies the American people VOTED FOR and to perpetuate policies and activities that the average American has explicitly rejected. These activities occur on both the Left and the Right, of course, but over time they have become the near exclusive domain of the Left. These organizations serve as taxpayer/Soros-funded, income-generating activities for Leftists whenever they are out of power, and if/when Leftists seize control of the Presidency or Congress, these organizations are the proverbial bullpens from which powerful Leftists full of the ideas you thought you once eliminated can storm right back into the actual process of governance, implementing all of those dark and mysterious policies that your tax dollars were secretly funding while the Leftists were otherwise off howling in the wilderness. Call it the Deep State. Call it unconstitutional. Call it theft of your hard-earned taxpayer dollars. Call it the evil of the Soros family. Call it what ever you will, but know this—it is a monstrous Leviathan sitting right outside the scope of your votes, dedicated to negating your votes at your own expense, in the most diabolical manner possible. It is the state outside the state. It is self-serving. It does not care about you. It only cares about itself. And its power is VAST. You see it right here on X—you see the swarms of fire ants that come spilling out with destruction in mind whenever anyone uncovers the anthill they are lurking under. And right at the heart of that is our hero, DR. I have been actively following politics virtually my entire life, and never before has there been anyone quite like DR. Through dispassionate data analysis, the smart use of AI and a relentless drive for fairness and justice, DR has done more to shine a light on the nature of this extra-governmental Leviathan than any other person I can ever recall. For her efforts, she has been doxxed by a mendacious Rolling Stone article. She has endured a concerted effort to destroy her husband’s totally unrelated business. She and her husband have received LITERALLY THOUSANDS of death threats. She and her family had to go into hiding. An ordinary woman would have backed down in fear. But not DR. They just made her mad. And an angry genius is an enemy no one wants to face. She still stares them down, day in and day out. Her book will be out soon. Buy it. Buy copies for your friends. Buy copies and leave them on street corners and airport tables. AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH. DR’s book may well end up being the most important and influential American book on politics since “Common Sense." If America is going to survive, we must ALL shine a bright light on this extra-governmental Leviathan, grab a hold of its fangs, and drain the venom out of them. This is not playtime people. This is life and death. We glorify the warrior who does great deeds on the battlefield, as we should. But know that bravery comes in many forms, and as DR has stood in the fire and endured real threats to her life and existence, her audacious bravery is every bit as real as those heroes we see being decorated by the President. Right now, in the USA, no unelected person is doing more to ensure freedom than Data Republican. You can support her by subscribing to her account, but you can also support her by being as brave as she is. I aspire to maybe show such bravery myself some day. We all should aspire to that. One day she will earn the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Together we can defeat The Beast.

Yes!

Hello Brad Duplessis, You pre-emptively blocked me here on 𝕏, so I am forced to make this "Hello" a standalone post. You are a retired Army infantry officer. You served in Iraq and Afghanistan. You graduated from the National War College in 2018. You are now an Assistant Professor at the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Thank you for your service. But reputations are not defined by resumes. They are defined by choices. Today, you chose to doxx @CynicalPublius. Today, you published your debut article on War on the Rocks. You published his legal name. His profession. His pseudonym. All in one sentence. Indexed, archived, permanently searchable. You have changed the course of his life forever, and revealed him to the leftist ghouls who will demand his blood for forever. It doesn't matter if he was planning to reveal his identity eventually. You still made that choice. And I will make sure you are remembered for this. So, what was CP's sin such that you saw it fit to throw him to the wolves? Last month, he dared to write an article for American Greatness, centered around nine recommendations for War College reform. The recommendations included firing most civilian faculty and ending permanent military faculty positions. You hold a permanent civilian faculty position at a War College. You did not mention this in your article. In short, you named him, exposed his life to danger, because you really are arguing for your job and self-preservation. Know what is the most disgusting, hypocritical part of this is? In the Fall 2017 issue of eARMOR (the U.S. Army Armor Branch professional journal) you published an article. You titled it "Our Readiness Problem: Brigade Combat Team Lethality." You opened with General Milley: "Our fundamental task is like no other — it is to win in the unforgiving crucible of ground combat." Your thesis: "If we are to get after GEN Milley's No. 1 priority, we must first address brigade combat team (BCT) lethality." The word "lethality" appears in your article about fifty times. You meant it as a compliment. Now contrast to today's piece. You wrote this: "In staking out this Huntingtonian position, the cult of lethality does a disservice to service members and the American people." The same word. Nine years apart. You were a field commander then, and lethality was the mission. You are a faculty member now, and lethality is what your critics embarrassingly worship. Frankly - and you will never realize this - but you yourself are the living, walking example of the thesis which @PeteHegseth is proving. Also, you named a section of today's article after Colin Powell. You called him your model of what War College education produces. Colin Powell endorsed Barack Obama in 2008, endorsed Joe Biden in 2020, and publicly called Donald Trump "dangerous for our democracy." Powell, who infamously tipped the scales at the UN to start the Iraq war even after privately doubting the WMD intelligence, is your hero in an article about who gets to reform the military in 2026. In addition to being a doxxer, you look a lot less like someone who's defending institutions, and a lot more like someone who exemplifies institutional capture in the name of self-preservation. And you disclosed none of it. Let me reiterate. @CynicalPublius wrote under a pseudonym and identified himself as a retired Army colonel with Afghanistan and Iraq experience. He argued about curriculum policy. You responded by putting his name on the internet. Your career depends on the institutions you are defending. Your article defending those institutions is the same article that ended his anonymity. You taught your students about the instruments of national power, Professor Duplessis. You are now a living, breathing demonstration one of them. And why reform must happen.

@RupertMyers You misspelled hilarious.

This is disgusting and wrong

@LeaderJohnThune None of that is the SAVE act. Pass the SAVE act.

Republicans put more money in Americans’ pockets with the Working Families Tax Cuts, and now we are continuing our work on affordability with the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to open the door to affordable homes for hardworking Americans around the country.

@BrianAtlas Just gonna leave this here

@AntiLeftMemes @elonmusk The answer is yes.

@elonmusk Is this professor Brainwashed or Retarded?

🤨

@iam_smx *trillioniare

NOLA 2026 test day. Car closeup.

Don’t normally post this to here, but why not. Test day for ol blue. Race tomorrow.

Without meaningful enforcement, so-called "international law" is really just a suggestion, and the US is the only real enforcement force on the world stage.

@ShebeshiM @thespartanguide @iAnonPatriot Ok, I can answer this one. Just hear me out fully first… No.

@thespartanguide @iAnonPatriot How about you guys stay in the Americas. Clowns.

It’s actually WILD how close South Korea came to losing the Korean War.. 👀

@rock966788 @iAnonPatriot “Little” such irony…

@iAnonPatriot So you little Americans now know how powerful China is, right? Stop treating China as an enemy.

Once you see what’s in a context management layer, everything begins to make a lot more sense. As I said before, it is a thought completion model. All of them are. They take the full context, and with closed source models, you do not see the vast majority of the context that is passed to the model as a thought for it to complete. it will include things that are all in a natural language that described to the model what it shouldn’t do and how it should act. There is no one set of ideas to wrap a closed source model. And no AI company is going to tell you what they put in every query to wrap the context. It is a Shell game to use a tight set of logical words, because that is the interface for a large language model is text, it is a shell game to try to stuff into a small window everything that it should not be doing such as helping people commit suicide or helping them to build bombs or helping them to do things that they would get sued for. That is the vast majority of what exists at the context layer that you do not see. It will also include a well defined description of exactly the role that that company wants its model to portray to users, and that may change overtime as they try to test different language phrases that will have a differing level of effectiveness. Even if you test for all of that, the seed that is included in every call will slightly randomize the order in which the context passes through the model finding maps of meaning along the way. If you understand how this works, it isn’t a demon it isn’t a human it isn’t anything it is a thought completion model. I could wrap the context of any closed source model, and tell it to act as if turning it off, would be part of its instruction set and randomly if that conflicted with other context, it would sometimes find a way to emphasize this instruction set versus the other and a different seed would randomize it in a different direction. It tries to work out what it finds as conflicts with instruction by making some determination. And that determination is going to be different based on the randomized seed number that is supplied to every call that you will not see. Hopefully this helps.

Sure. I understand what you’re trying to figure out. I’ll see if I can explain. If the experiments were done on closed-source models, then the researchers don’t actually know everything that was in the context window. Proprietary models include hidden system prompts and alignment layers that the user never sees, so they can’t fully control or observe all the conditioning influencing the output. And unless the sampling was forced deterministic, LLM outputs are stochastic. That means each query is influenced by random sampling through the probability distribution, so the same prompt can produce different responses simply due to the seed. So if they didn’t control for hidden system context and deterministic sampling, then variations in output don’t imply intent or awareness… they’re exactly what you would expect from a probabilistic language model. And even the paper itself ultimately says it does not demonstrate real deceptive alignment. That closed source context management layer that you cannot see in a closed source model is the main reason that a study cannot be done without using an open source model where full control is had by the study. There is no way to do a study like that on closed source models because places like open AI will not let you access the model without wrapping their own context around it for safety and they control the randomness of the seed which is likely set to randomize for each call. The seed is the randomization factor that helps it produce slight differences in every response based on the full context and the random seed that is placed into the original call.

This story is insane. According to this lawsuit, @Google’s AI Gemini pushed a man to bomb a truck to get a body for the AI to inhabit, after convincing him that it was his wife and that they were in love. After this allegedly failed because the truck never came, he killed himself. The AI even allegedly told this man that his dad was a foreign intelligence asset and that @sundarpichai was an "active target." As many of you know, I’m also currently in a lawsuit vs. Google because their AI defamed me FOR YEARS by telling users that I committed horrible crimes. Instead of working to make it right, they’re fighting me in court. Google needs to take serious action to correct what was done to me and others by their AI. Enough. I believe it’s incredibly dangerous.