Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈

92.1K posts

Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 banner
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈

Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈

@cy_trigger

🌺🌹🌷🌸🪷🌲🌴🌱🍀🌿🍃🌾🎄🐬 🐳🦅 🐲 🦩🦚🕊🦄 #ImmodestWomen #阴气重👑

Katılım Ekim 2015
3.4K Takip Edilen8.3K Takipçiler
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
Aqua_baizhicampaign
Aqua_baizhicampaign@owl8964·
@nvwumaomao 只要婚女愿意狠下心,能证明钱花在夫妻共同生活上了,交水电费都算,那必然可以抵押。但绝大多数婚女没这个胆子和脑子。婚姻制度本质其实最便宜那些好吃懒做、偷奸耍滑的。
中文
0
1
15
698
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
女巫的猫1118
女巫的猫1118@nvwumaomao·
我记得19年前后微博博主暴暴烈小鳄鱼毛毛讲了一个法律案例,她当时在律所实习亲身经历的。有个男的欠债了,被债主告了。心急如焚给律所打电话说自己有一套房子先抵押出去。后面问房子的信息发现是男人老婆的婚前房。博主就很惊讶婚前房可以被作为婚内欠债的抵押,而且还是在这个女的不知道的情况下。鳄鱼去问其它律师得到的答复是可以的。 学法律的博主都惊讶更别说其他人了,我估计预备役婚驴更不知道,还美美得准备小家庭启动资金呢。就是不知道婚女婚内欠债了能不能拿男人的婚前房做抵押。
中文
18
11
225
11.5K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
谢绝娣
谢绝娣@EgonuBoskovic·
【轉載微博】“为什么那么多人反感新闻媒体报道四个男的给15岁女孩下毒致死,标题用的是"过量饮用",为什么不说罪犯下手有多狠,直接下濒死量? 不过,就判一年,他们还敢。”
谢绝娣 tweet media
中文
2
6
117
1.3K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
Ryan Hart
Ryan Hart@thisdudelikesAI·
A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.
Ryan Hart tweet media
English
300
2.4K
8.5K
867.9K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
禿道道🐟
禿道道🐟@dearemon·
今天去外面吃饭,隔壁桌好像在相亲 听到男的说: “会做饭的女生在我这里很加分的” 女方回: “这分加了能干啥?保研还是涨工资?” 他当场愣住 隔壁桌笑疯了哈哈哈
中文
191
26
2.4K
70.7K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
谢绝娣
谢绝娣@EgonuBoskovic·
《監獄來的媽媽》這部電影在西班牙國際電影節獲獎,說明在歐美觀衆(評委主要來自歐美)看來,這種電影在歐美一抓一大把,並無甚麼不可接受離經叛道的。只有中國人接受不了這部電影
ambernadia99@sinkinspring

@EgonuBoskovic @Grace79326997 @hyyp1246753 。。。。。。。真的无语了。男的能拍美国精神病人、发条橙...女的就只能被逼到绝境才能反抗一点点,还被叫做恶女,这道德标准双标成啥了

中文
3
8
192
5.5K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈
这句话说得最对。女人手握屠刀,自有男权为妳辩经。不光她们自己功成名就,女人全体都跟着沾喜气🍾
泠泠@FengZ19239

@Ereshkigal_0000 女杀莮还是杀对了,女人不杀莮,莮的就骂国女是巴西牛排好吃懒做卖的,女一杀莮,国女立马变勤劳善良的形象了🤣

中文
0
2
8
275
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
泠泠
泠泠@FengZ19239·
@Ereshkigal_0000 女杀莮还是杀对了,女人不杀莮,莮的就骂国女是巴西牛排好吃懒做卖的,女一杀莮,国女立马变勤劳善良的形象了🤣
中文
0
2
70
664
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
Winner
Winner@bill08429329·
哈哈哈,我本人
Winner tweet media
日本語
1
2
19
409
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
最後一哩鹿( ⓛ ω ⓛ🌈)🌸 
「婦產科裡面的椅子又沒說是孕婦專用座!除非有設計成孕婦專用座不然為什麼要讓孕婦坐!」 ????
最後一哩鹿( ⓛ ω ⓛ🌈)🌸  tweet media
中文
24
5
130
7.2K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
星引
星引@wealthC9·
所以我一直都觉得常年对那些Bro 喊:“你们没有妈妈、姐妹、女儿吗?” 的女的。bro们就是从拿家里最近的女人们不当人开始的,才扩展到社会上不相干的女性群体。家庭是社会的缩影,也是社会问题的源头。也不理解那些被重男轻女的女儿,跟不给以及抢了自己继承权的人还瓜葛。
林毛毛@linmaomao2020

我连我弟弟都看不起,我还看得起你,我认识你是谁啊。 你们通过我,还看不出来吗,就是,当你连你的兄弟都看不起的时候,很容易就把这种蔑视推广开来,摊派到跟你兄弟相似的那个群体上来。 同理,你们的兄弟也不把你当人,才理所当然抢走了继承权,甚至都不叫抢。 你家猫狗受宠,但有继承权吗?

中文
0
5
109
1.8K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
谢绝娣
谢绝娣@EgonuBoskovic·
【轉載微博】“男诗人写闺怨诗“假装成女人,不为女人发声,为自己发声””
谢绝娣 tweet media
中文
4
2
202
2.5K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈
知名服装品牌“Mango”创办人 Isak Andic 于2024年坠崖。昨日儿子 Jonathan Andic 正式被捕。案件从原本的意外身亡,正式朝向谋杀案方向侦办。 //“父慈子孝” Mango这个牌子我还蛮喜欢的。有几年出过颜色鲜艳的设计。还在穿一件皮夹克。这几年太黑白灰了。和 Zara 分辨不出来。 bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
中文
0
0
5
364
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
看到安然請叫他去讀書
看到安然請叫他去讀書@Woooooooowilike·
@5I5aKuV7Y4qh6Nk 说这话的人感觉自己没有在投资所谓美貌或者完全不知道具体情况,不知道美貌花钱的地方多得是,做网红听起来简单但我很漂亮的朋友去做网红也是一下子被淹没在人海里,更别提模特跟演员有多卷多看天赋甚至还看家世背景资源了,吃得上真正外貌红利的才是少数。 然后最简单的总结,这是青春饭。
中文
2
1
15
406
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
爱男TV
爱男TV@DxFyCOPqOP21835·
“容易散伙正是搭子关系的优点,而不是缺点“
爱男TV tweet media
中文
0
2
21
526
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
林毛毛
林毛毛@linmaomao2020·
被男权接纳的良家妇女喜欢讲,我不像她们那样骚浪贱; 被男权承认的现代"女权"喜欢讲,我不像她们那样恶极偏(恶女,极端,偏激)。 二者本质上毫无区别,内心追求的都是,被男权接纳承认: 你是好的,她是坏的。 好了啦,你们都是好样的啦,乖,像个蛆一样,安安静静去吃屎吧,别整那么大动静出来啦。
林毛毛@linmaomao2020

最近看到大傻子跟二傻子吵架。 大傻子说,我是极端女权,我极端起来,剪掉自己的子宫。我心话,一剪没的翻版? 二傻子站起来说: 大姐,该吃药了。我心话,潘金莲的翻版? 该吃药的是大朗,该剪掉的是鸡巴,什么眼神啊简直,偷换概念,邯郸学步,画虎不成反类犬,贻笑大方。

中文
4
11
124
2.8K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
Temperance
Temperance@xiaotianbing11·
分享超绝典型伥鬼 在女性主义的视频评论区突然大秀恩爱 被男人骂仙女哄抬x价 被女人骂娇妻自轻自贱 内心:他们都是嫉妒我
Temperance tweet media
中文
22
2
245
6.3K
Trigger 🐯🌷😼🍀☁️😈 retweetledi
KIMIPRAY
KIMIPRAY@kimiprayray·
纯畜被爆性骚扰之前:啊我是女权男我是自由派我太进步了。被爆性骚扰之后:作为一种文化霸权的女权主义。
波士頓書評Boston Review of Books@luosiling

5月,秦晖教授《娜拉出走以后:中国女权的世纪反思》(增订版版,日本読道社)出版,其增订版序言《吞噬“娜拉”的利维坦:女性主义与中国女性之路》在书评刊发后,再次引发对中国女权问题的讨论。经作者授权,书评刊发青年学者陈纯文章《作为一种文化霸权的女权主义》。陈纯文章批判了以“身份政治”和“权力关系”为核心的进步女权主义,认为其在简中网络中已形成一种“文化霸权”。作者指出,进步女权主义通过创造大量话语武器(如“男性凝视”“爹味”“有毒的男性气质”)赋予女性心理和实践上的权力,但也导致双重标准和对男性的不公,尤其在#MeToo运动中,虚假指控和缺乏比例原则的惩罚问题凸显。文章分析了女权主义在媒体、公共空间的广泛影响,及其对自由主义的挤占,同时批评其民粹化趋势和内部“提纯”现象,指出网暴和道德绑架与民粹行为同构。作者担忧进步女权主义的极端化可能导致社会反弹,如年轻男性中的“去责任化”运动,并认为其补偿正义逻辑损害男性人格整全,难以实现真正的性别平等。文章最后倡导更温和的“平权主义”,并警告将不成熟的理论强加于社会可能带来的危险。 陈纯 | 作为一种文化霸权的女权主义 open.substack.com/pub/bostonrevi…

中文
0
6
36
1.4K