Pedro

@CodeByPoonam I don’t think this will replace Google search. Gemini seems ahead of this but search is best left as is. I like to just google it which already has AI integrated without having to use a separate app.

RIP Google Search OpenAI just announced SearchGPT and it's INSANE Here're 5 new ways of Search you don't want to miss:

@ElonMuskAOC 14

Can you solve it? If you can, I’ll hire you.

@Travis_in_Flint The Matrix

@donalddhoffman What are dreams? Is that a different reality consciousness travels to?

Evolution shapes sensory systems to guide adaptive behavior. It does not, in addition, shape sensory systems to reveal truths about the structure of objective reality, whatever that reality might be. youtube.com/watch?v=fXFxJW…

@ScannerFremont Did they catch the guys yet?

@FredyBe24150208 The captain sucks ass for letting Daniel Son go. The Natzy got their way in the first season. Bad decision making; no leadership in that boat for sure.

@PicturesFoIder Go zuck!!!

Who’s winning, Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg?

@OfficialFBMA He seems to be enjoying it so what exactly is the issue.

This behavior won’t stop until we start sending these type of women to jail.. Not even being funny she needs be charged with something.

@toddstarnes And how does that feel?

6 blacks brutally beat a white teenager. They demanded his shoes. Even after he gave them his shoes, the blacks continued to attack the kid. No national news coverage. No condemnation from NAACP. No marches by "civil rights" groups. That's because the white kid's life doesn't matter.

@ElonMuskAOC Hope he breaks your nose and you cry like a little biatch.

Mark “Tweeb” Zuckerberg. I will knock you out cold.

@ElonMuskAOC Go Mark! Kick that Nazi`s ass...

@elonmusk @alexeheath Your going to get your non-us ass kicked back to Africa

@alexeheath Vegas Octagon

I’ve confirmed that Mark Zuckerberg is serious about fighting @elonmusk and is now waiting on the details (if Musk decides to follow through) “The story speaks for itself,” a Meta spokesperson says re: Zuck’s IG post saying “send me location” theverge.com/2023/6/21/2376…

@ElonMuskAOC @joebldenpress Do you know what it means to be an American?

@joebldenpress Joe, do you know what that means?

Life is complete

@JohnReedStark The SEC is overstepping their authority. They should not be telling me if it’s ok or not where I decide to put my money.

Why, IMHO, Coinbase's SEC Defense is Criminal Coinbase and its shills argue that when Coinbase’s SEC initial public offering (IPO) registration went effective, the SEC somehow also approved the bonafides of Coinbase’s business. What a crock and possibly a criminal offense. Yes, you read that correctly -- a criminal offense. Read on to understand why I have this opinion. Coinbase's "safe harbor" defense (i.e. that the SEC somehow ratified and provided a "stamp of approval in perpetuity for Coinbase's business operations) is not only a losing argument, but is also a complete misinterpretation of what SEC IPO registration approval actually means. The SEC's role when "approving" Coinbase's registration statement was merely to ensure that Coinbase made the proper disclosures in their application. To suggest that the SEC somehow endorsed or approved the various business lines of Coinbase (so Coinbase now has some sort of regulatory safe harbor for everything they do and the SEC is limited by some sort of doctrine of "regulatory estoppel" barring them from charging Coinbase) has no basis in law or in fact. Merely because two years ago the SEC reviewed Coinbase’s registration statement (which Coinbase often refers to as its "business plan") and approved Coinbase to go public is irrelevant. The same goes for any public company that has ever filed any registration statement with the SEC. Along these lines, every prospectus or offering document provided to investors has to have what is known as the "SEC No Approval Clause" on its cover. The SEC No Approval Clause typically states something like this: “The Securities and Exchange Commission and state securities regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities, or determined if the prospectus or this prospectus supplement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.” (emphasis added) The SEC essentially tells investors, we looked at the prospectus and we have no opinion regarding the merits or legalities of its operations. The goal of SEC review is to ensure that investors and potential investors have all the facts before buying a security, not to confirm that any business is legitimate. The SEC staff reviews registration statements to see if the SEC’s disclosure rules are satisfied -- and that's it. sec.gov/reportspubs/in… The SEC does not evaluate the merits of securities offerings, or determine whether the securities offered are "good" investments or appropriate for a particular type of investor. Furthermore, the approval of a registration statement is not an SEC endorsement of its products or services or a statement that a registrant will lawfully operate its business. sec.gov/files/ipo-inve…. See also, sec.gov/reportspubs/in… The federal registration of securities offerings requires the issuer of the securities to disclose all material information relevant to an informed investment decision. Coinbase met the basic standards for disclosure in its registration statement, which was filed, and "went effective" after approval of the SEC.  sec.gov/news/studies/u… No sales of securities in a registered offering may occur until the SEC declares the registration statement effective. sec.gov/files/ipo-inve… A registration statement typically becomes effective by order of the SEC. In declaring a registration statement effective under the Securities Act of 1933, the SEC does not consider the merits of the offering, but whether all material information is disclosed. In such reviews, the SEC staff concentrates on disclosures that appear to conflict with SEC rules or the applicable accounting standards and on disclosure that appears to be materially deficient in explanation or clarity. The SEC staff ’s review often results in revisions to the prospectus. However, the review process is also not a guarantee that a company’s disclosure is complete or accurate. law.cornell.edu/wex/securities… For example, if the SEC approves the registration of a drug company that offers a cure for heart disease, the SEC has not approved that the drug is safe. If the SEC approves the registration statement of an electric car company, the SEC has not approved that the cars produced are safe or that the brakes on the cars will function correctly. UCLA law Professor Stephen Bainbridge neatly sums up the origins of the SEC review process as follows: "Back in 1933, Congress considered three different models of securities regulation that states used in their blue sky laws: --The merit model: Review by a state official of a proposed offering of securities to determine whether the deal included provisions that were “unfair, unjust, inequitable or oppressive” and whether it offered “a fair return.” --The fraud model: Simply prohibit fraud in the sale of securities, with civil and/or criminal penalties for committing fraud. --The disclosure model: Allow issuers to sell very risky or even unsound securities, provided they gave buyers enough information to make an informed investment decision. In adopting the Securities Act of 1933, Congress opted for a mix of the latter two approaches. As a result, there is no merit review of whether investors will earn a decent return or the terms of the deal are fair. In theory, the act allows you to sell investors a rotten egg, as long as you tell them very clearly that the egg is rotten." professorbainbridge.com/professorbainb… Finally, Coinbase's Form S1 Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933, the form that Coinbase filled out to become a public company and the form that the SEC reviewed, disclosed that there is regulatory uncertainty regarding the status of their activities” and that Coinbase could be subject to a litany of civil, criminal, and administrative fines, penalties, orders and actions (which is exactly what is happening right now). In other words, Coinbase attested to the risks of their operations, stating unequivocally that: "A particular crypto asset’s status as a “security” in any relevant jurisdiction is subject to a high degree of uncertainty and if we are unable to properly characterize a crypto asset, we may be subject to regulatory scrutiny, investigations, fines, and other penalties, and our business, operating results, and financial condition may be adversely affected." In fact, Coinbase's risk disclosure relating to the SEC Wells Notice is extensive and sprinkled throughout Coinbase's Form S1. Here's another example: "Our business is subject to extensive laws, rules, regulations, policies, orders, determinations, directives, treaties, and legal and regulatory interpretations and guidance in the markets in which we operate . . . Many of these legal and regulatory regimes were adopted prior to the advent of the internet, mobile technologies, crypto assets, and related technologies. As a result, they do not contemplate or address unique issues associated with the crypto-economy, are subject to significant uncertainty, and vary widely across U.S. federal, state, and local and international jurisdictions. These legal and regulatory regimes, including the laws, rules, and regulations thereunder, evolve frequently and may be modified, interpreted, and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another, and may conflict with one another. Moreover, the complexity and evolving nature of our business and the significant uncertainty surrounding the regulation of the crypto-economy requires us to exercise our judgement as to whether certain laws, rules, and regulations apply to us, and it is possible that governmental bodies and regulators may disagree with our conclusions. To the extent we have not complied with such laws, rules, and regulations, we could be subject to significant fines, revocation of licenses, limitations on our products and services, reputational harm, and other regulatory consequences." sec.gov/Archives/edgar… Indeed, Coinbase specifically warned in the “Risk Factors” section of its Form S-1 that they may be charged by the SEC in precisely the same way the SEC has charged them (!): “Persons that effect transactions in crypto assets that are securities in the United States may be subject to registration with the SEC as a “broker” or “dealer.” Platforms that bring together purchasers and sellers to trade crypto assets that are securities in the United States are generally subject to registration as national securities exchanges, or must qualify for an exemption, such as by being operated by a registered broker- dealer as an alternative trading system, or ATS, in compliance with rules for ATSs. Persons facilitating clearing and settlement of securities may be subject to registration with the SEC as a clearing agency.” (emphasis added) Coinbase's oddly concocted argument, absurd interpretation of securities regulation and desperate pivot of "regulatory estoppel" is yet another bogus smokescreen designed to deflect and dissemble. And it's also yet another reason why Coinbase will lose to the SEC in litigation.

@ACTBrigitte Pimp statue?

President Trump deserves to have statues built in his honor.

@ElonMuskAOC Don't be butt hurt about it

US War criminals 0 indictments Hunter Biden 0 indictments The Clintons 0 indictments Epstein clients 0 indictments Anthony Fauci 0 indictments Bill Gates 0 indictments Donald Trump 1 indictment for taking classified documents home

@elonmusk @StephenKing 90% minorities is equal biatch?

@StephenKing Almost everyone would agree that no one is above the law, but it must be applied equally. Differential pursuit of justice undermines public faith in the system.

@garyblack00 It will drop its shorts again in 2024 when he sells again. Nothing you can do about that.

There are numerous fundamental reasons $TSLA is now at $244 +98% YTD. TSLA stopped cutting prices and signaled 2Q auto GMs would be the trough. Elon choose a seasoned media exec to be CEO of Twitter. Elon confirmed CT delivs would start in 4Q. Elon confirmed two next gen $25-$30K EVs with 5M vol. Elon signaled advertising is coming which will accelerate EV adoption. TSLA convinced Treasury to allow a full $7,500 EV credit on M-3. China vols have remained strong. TSLA closed new charging deals with both $F and $GM. And Fed will almost certainly pause int rate hikes next week. Markets look forward not backward and discount future events into stock prices.

@elonmusk Pumpper

Cry 'Havoc!' and let slip the Doges of war

.