Nap
2.1K posts


Grok Imagine just got a new "Scribbli" template It's super cool....try it now!

This GPT Image 2 prompt is going insanely viral right now. “Redraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in MS Paint with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know what, whatever, just draw it however you want.”

This GPT Image 2 prompt is going insanely viral right now. “Redraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in MS Paint with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know what, whatever, just draw it however you want.”

🚨 BOOM! ELON MUSK TORCHES SAM ALTMAN AND OPENAI IN COURT! Elon is wrapping up his testimony today. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit to benefit humanity… and now he’s exposing how they completely betrayed that mission. Musk dropped the hammer: He feels like a “fool” for donating $38 million that helped build this now $800 billion monster — all while they ditched the nonprofit promise and went full profit-driven. Classic Silicon Valley betrayal.




🚨🇺🇸 Day two of Elon's lawsuit against OpenAI delivered some of the most damning testimony yet about how the company drifted from its original mission... Elon told the court he was "a fool" for handing OpenAI free funding to build what was supposed to be a humanity-first nonprofit, only to watch it morph into a for-profit operation that's now eyeing one of the largest IPOs in history. His position has been consistent: he was fine with a for-profit arm "as long as it was a subsidiary of the nonprofit." What he wasn't fine with was the for-profit becoming the main event, which is exactly what happened. The receipts on screen made the point for him. A 2022 text exchange showed Sam Altman responding to Elon's complaint about OpenAI's valuation explosion with: "I agree this feels bad." Not "you're wrong." Not "this is a misunderstanding." A literal acknowledgment from the CEO that the optics matched Elon's accusation of a bait and switch. The man who built OpenAI alongside Elon, took his money, and helmed the conversion to for-profit, agreed in writing that it felt bad. Elon's lawsuit is asking the court to reverse OpenAI's conversion, remove Altman and President Greg Brockman from the board, and award $130 billion in damages to OpenAI's nonprofit foundation. That's not a small ask. But the bigger ask is whether American charitable giving means anything if a nonprofit can take billions in donations under one mission and pivot to a different one once the technology becomes valuable. OpenAI's defense leaned hard on trying to trip Elon up on yes-or-no questions, which prompted him to push back: "Your questions are not simple. They are designed to trick me." Even the judge had to step in to keep things moving. Whatever the jury decides, the trial has already accomplished one thing. The internal communications now in the public record paint a picture of a company that knew exactly what it was doing when it walked away from its founding promise. @elonmusk spent years warning about exactly this. The receipts now exist whether the verdict goes his way or not. Source: CNN


