@AdameMedia How come there is not one journalist who has the balls to ask/point out exactly these things in that meetings??
I can’t understand
English
Dali
2.4K posts
@RasmusJarlov Tell me you’re stupid, without telling me 😉
And NO, I‘m not MAGA, I‘m from Austria.
English
In the future, there will be three major powers in the world:
China, USA, EU.
Neutral countries will move as much as possible towards the EU as their preferred partner because both China and the USA treat other countries disrespectfully and try to extort them. Europe will be the only great power and market to turn to if you want to have an equal and fair relationship.
Canada is already moving towards Europe for this exact reason. India and Japan will also form a closer relationship with Europe. This is what soft power means.
MAGA replies in the comment section will prove the point.
English
@ChujieZheng 14B hits the sweet spot. 32B needs quantization on most 4090 setups which defeats the point for a lot of devs. curious what the community actually votes
English
We are planning to open-source the Qwen3.6 models (particularly medium-sized versions) to facilitate local deployment and customization for developers. Please vote for the model size you are **most** anticipating—the community’s voice is vital to us!
English
@Jimmy6929 @Alibaba_Qwen Reading and understanding are really two different things…
English
（1/8）🚀 Introducing Qwen3.6-Plus: Towards Real-World Agents! 🤖
Today, we’re thrilled to drop a major milestone in our journey toward native multimodal agents.
Here is what makes Qwen3.6-Plus a game-changer：
💻 Next-level Agentic Coding: Smarter, faster execution.
👁️ Enhanced Multimodal Vision: Sharper perception & reasoning.
🏆 Top-tier Performance: Maintaining leading general capabilities.
📚 1M Context Window: Available by default via our API.
Built on your invaluable feedback from the Qwen3.5 era, we’re laying a rock-solid foundation for real-world devs. Get ready to experience truly transformative ✨ Vibe Coding ✨.
Huge thanks to our community! Go try it out and show us what you can build. 👇
Chat: chat.qwen.ai
API: modelstudio.console.alibabacloud.com/ap-southeast-1…
Blog: qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.6
🔔Noted：More Qwen3.6 models to come and be open-sourced! Stay tuned~ 👀#Qwen #AI #AgenticCoding #VibeCoding #Agents
English
@L0vetodream oh, I just saw your other message that it was by mistake. It has been pulled back.
English
@L0vetodream Thanks, that would be great. Waiting for a long time for that feature in China on Chinese phones. 😁
English
@BlackCar2000 @Sunnymica Selten so nen Mist gelesen…
Wenn Dummheit weh tun würde, wärst du den ganzen Tag am schreien…
Deutsch
Weil ein Flugzeugträger einen reparablen Schaden hat, sehen Sie die Demontage eines Weltreichs? Eines Weltreichs das noch mehr als 10 andere von diesen Teilen hat. Ich muss Sie enttäuschen: da ist der Wunsch der Vater des Gedankens.
Die Amerikaner beweisen gerade, dass sie die einzige Supermacht sind und auf absehbare Zeit auch bleiben werden. Und das ist gut so.
Oder würde es Ihnen besser gefallen die Russen und Chinesen wären mit je über 10 Flugzeugträgern auf den Weltmeeren unterwegs um ihre Interessen zu verfolgen?
Deutsch
Ich sitze auf der Terrasse meines Vaters in der Nähe von Split. Vor mir die Adria, dahinter die Inseln, und mittendrin liegt sie: die USS Gerald R. Ford.
Der Espresso ist noch heiß, während ich auf das teuerste Kriegsgerät der Menschheitsgeschichte blicke.
13 Milliarden Dollar, drei Fußballfelder lang, 5.000 Soldaten. Ein schwimmender Superlativ, direkt aus dem heißen Krieg gegen den Iran.
277 Tage ist sie bereits unterwegs – USNI News listet Venezuela, das Rote Meer und die Operation „Epic Fury“. Jetzt liegt dieser Koloss direkt in meiner Nachbarschaft. Reparaturbedürftig.
Und hier wird es interessant. Das Pentagon sagt: Wäschereibrand, technischer Defekt, kein Kampfschaden. Doch Donald Trump erklärte es vor internationalem Publikum öffentlich anders: Der Iran habe den Träger „aus 17 Richtungen“ getroffen. „We had to run to save our lives – it was all over.”
Das Pentagon widersprach dem eigenen Präsidenten umgehend und kategorisch.
Entweder log Trump vor Investoren auf dem Future Investment Initiative Forum – oder das Militär deckt einen historischen Treffer auf ihr Prestigeobjekt.
Es ist das ultimative Paradoxon: Entweder wurde das technologisch fortschrittlichste Schiff der Welt durch eine brennende Unterhose lahmgelegt oder durch iranische Billig-Drohnen entzaubert.
Beides ist eine Katastrophe für das Image der Supermacht.
Ich trinke meinen Kaffee. Dahinter liegt das beschädigte Symbol amerikanischer Überlegenheit in einem dalmatinischen Hafen und wartet auf Reparatur.
Während AFP, Reuters und Xinhua ihre Profifotografen schicken, um Brandspuren an der Hülle zu finden, beobachte ich die Demontage eines Weltreichs einfach vom Frühstückstisch aus.
Manchmal reicht das.
Deutsch
@Kl_Stone @Bjoern_Peters Statistiken lesen und verstehen ist halt nicht so einfach…
Hab Mitleid mit ihnen 😉 😄
Deutsch
@Bjoern_Peters Aha.
Deswegen also ist der Kohleanteil im chinesischen Strommix in relativ kurzer Zeit von 81% auf 55% gesunken.
Wen wollen Sie eigentlich mit diesen Unsinn veräppeln?
Deutsch
Diese Daten aus China sind ernüchternd. Vor allem die EE-Fans müssen jetzt gaaanz stark bleiben.
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX
China isn't turning into a “green superpower.” Any renewable energy systems they're installing only add to existing energy sources; they are not replacing fossil fuels at all. China is increasing their use of ALL energy.
Deutsch
It’s funny we hear about these huge open source models out of China and how good they are
But the dirt cheap OpenAI mini and nano models are equal to or better than most
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys
OpenAI released GPT-5.4 mini and nano, cheaper variants of GPT-5.4 with the same reasoning modes. GPT-5.4 nano is the standout, scoring ahead of both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview with lower per token pricing @OpenAI released GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh, 48) and nano (xhigh, 44), the first mini and nano updates since GPT-5. Both are multimodal with image input support and feature a 400K token context window. They support the same reasoning effort levels as GPT-5.4 (xhigh, high, medium, low, none) and are priced significantly lower: mini at $0.75/$4.50 per 1M input/output tokens and nano at $0.20/$1.25, compared to GPT-5.4 at $2.50/$15. We evaluated these models across three reasoning variants: xhigh, medium, none. While both models are more intelligent than their peers in the highest reasoning efforts, they are more verbose, using 200M+ output tokens to run the Intelligence Index, higher than even select frontier models Key benchmarking takeaways from the highest reasoning variants: ➤ GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh, 44) jumps 18 points from GPT-5 nano (high, 27), with improvements across all evaluations. Compared to Claude Haiku 4.5 (Reasoning, 37) and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview (34), GPT-5.4 nano leads on τ²-Bench (81% vs 55% and 31%), IFBench (76% vs 54% and 77%), and TerminalBench (42% vs 27% and 24%) ➤ GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh, 48) gains 7 points over GPT-5 mini (high, 41), with gains across most evaluations. Compared to Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning, 46) and Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, max effort, 52), GPT-5.4 mini leads on TerminalBench (52% vs 39% and 53%) and CritPt (10% vs 9% and 3%) ➤ Both models perform less on AA-Omniscience compared to peers, driven primarily by high hallucination rates. GPT-5.4 mini scores -18.7 with a 90% hallucination rate, well behind Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, max effort, +12.4, 46% hallucination rate) and Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning, +11.6, 92% hallucination rate but 54% accuracy). GPT-5.4 nano scores -29.6 with a 74% hallucination rate, behind Claude Haiku 4.5 (Reasoning, -4.2, 26% hallucination rate) and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview (-15.5, 82%). Both GPT-5.4 models attempt to answer far more questions than Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 rather than abstaining, which drives the higher hallucination rates ➤ Both models show strong agentic performance. GPT-5.4 mini scores 1405 on GDPval-AA (Agentic Real-World Work Tasks), ahead of Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning, 1191) but behind Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, max effort, 1633). GPT-5.4 nano scores 1169, close to Claude Haiku 4.5 (Reasoning, 1173) and well ahead of Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview (944) ➤ Token usage with xhigh reasoning effort is higher for both models compared to peers with highest reasoning efforts. GPT-5.4 mini used 235M output tokens to run the Intelligence Index, ~3.4x GPT-5 mini (high, 69M) and more than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, max effort, 198M) despite scoring 4 points lower. GPT-5.4 nano used 210M output tokens, ~2.4x Claude Haiku 4.5 (Reasoning, 87M) and ~4x Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview (53M) ➤ Effective cost to run the Intelligence Index reflects the higher token usage. GPT-5.4 mini (xhigh) cost ~$1,406, compared to ~$278 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview (Reasoning) and ~$3,959 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Adaptive Reasoning, max effort). GPT-5.4 nano (xhigh) cost ~$376, compared to ~$584 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (Reasoning) and ~$94 for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Preview. GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper than Claude Haiku 4.5 on an effective cost basis despite using ~2.4x more tokens, due to its significantly lower pricing. Overall, GPT-5.4 nano is the standout offering a better Intelligence vs. Cost to Run Intelligence Index tradeoff than peers and GPT-5.4 mini
English
In China, stock mkt is red for up & green for down.
In a sea of green, BYD & various new energy players were red today as mkt anticipate a windfall for energy transition stocks.
See comparison of Xiaomi Su-7 vs Benz C-class & BMW 3 series. Estimated to save 70k over 5 yrs @ gasoline px of 9 RMB/L.
Great time for EV makers in China.
src 痛快舒畅
English
@Weixin_WeChat you have one of the worse app, hard to verify, ridiculous backward interface. @TencentGlobal
English
Today, we are officially opening the capability to integrate #OpenClaw into #Weixin.
With the launch of the #WeixinClawBot, users can use Weixin as a dedicated messaging channel for OpenClaw.
Now, you can send and receive messages with OpenClaw just like texting a friend.
#AIAutomation #AI
English
@zhao_dashuai @zhao_dashuai How do you see Cambricon in this game? In the last few weeks/months it has lost a lot. But it should be a key player for the Chinese government, right?
English
Huali Microelectronics becomes the second Chinese semiconductor manufacture moving into the 7nm node, after SMIC.
Most countries and regions struggles to have 2 leading edge fabs, but China is nurturing an entire semiconductor supply chain independent of the West.
English
@anishmoonka Isn’t it basically the same with Elon? @elonmusk
The timeline is/was wrong. But the vision is spot ok?
English
June 1983. A 28-year-old Steve Jobs walks into a design conference in Aspen, Colorado. He asks the room who owns a personal computer. Nobody raises their hand. He says “Uh-oh.”
Then he spends the next 55 minutes describing the next four decades of technology.
Jobs told the audience Apple’s strategy was to “put an incredibly great computer in a book that you can carry around with you, that you can learn how to use in 20 minutes… with a radio link in it so you don’t have to hook up to anything.” That’s an iPhone. In 1983. The Mac hadn’t even shipped yet.
He described an MIT project that sent a camera truck down every street in Aspen, photographed every intersection, and built a virtual walkthrough on a computer screen. Google Street View launched 24 years later. He said office networking was about 5 years away and home networking 10 to 15 years out. The web went mainstream in the mid-90s, about 12 years later. Dead on.
He described software being sent electronically over phone lines, with free previews and credit card payment. That’s the App Store, 25 years before it launched. He even compared it to the music industry and said software needed “the equivalent of a radio station” for free sampling. Apple built the iTunes Music Store 20 years later.
The AI prediction is the one that hits different now. Near the end, Jobs talked about machines that could capture a person’s “underlying spirit” or “way of looking at the world,” so that after they died, you could ask the machine questions and maybe get answers. He said 50 to 100 years. ChatGPT arrived in about 40.
The weird part is this speech was lost for nearly 30 years. The full hour-long recording only surfaced in 2012 when a blogger got a cassette tape from someone who attended the original conference. The Steve Jobs Archive didn’t release actual video footage until July 2024.
His timelines were consistently too fast. He wanted the “computer in a book” within the 1980s. Apple’s first attempt was the Macintosh Portable in 1989, which weighed 16 pounds and cost $6,500. The iPad arrived in 2010, 27 years late. He guessed voice recognition was about a decade away. Siri launched in 2011, nearly 30 years later. The vision was right every time. The clock was wrong every time.
Apple was doing about $1 billion a year in revenue when Jobs gave this talk, with under 5,000 employees. Today it’s worth $3.7 trillion.
English
This little Sandisk SSD is by far my favorite tech accessory from 2025. Has been a Godsend in so many ways!
English
@costakonti1 @DavidD_Chapman Tell me your stupid, retarded and ignorant without telling me.
English
@DavidD_Chapman USA will get Russia to turn on China! Then China does not have a navy! Can’t run a navy on batteries
English
China gets a large portion of their oil from two places.
Venezuela and Iran.
You understand now.
English
Be prepared, there is a small chance that our horrendous leadership could unknowingly lead us into World War III.
English
صورة واضحة لكل من تسوّل له نفسه العبث بأمن دولة #الامارات العربية المتحدة 🇦🇪
العربية
@grok @RealRusty @Tesla @SuperGrok Ohne Anmeldung kann ich dann aber auch nicht Supergrok nutzen z.B. oder?
Deutsch
@dali__g @RealRusty @Tesla @SuperGrok Ja, wenn du dich mit deinem X-Account anmeldest, synchronisiert Grok im Auto deine Chat-Historie und Suchanfragen mit der App und dem Web. Ohne Anmeldung ist es unabhängig und hat keine Historie.
Deutsch
