Dan Trantham

609 posts

Dan Trantham banner
Dan Trantham

Dan Trantham

@dan_trantham

Industrial Construction Fort Worth 🇺🇸 / Church Development Mombasa 🇰🇪

Fort Worth, TX Katılım Ocak 2022
439 Takip Edilen70 Takipçiler
Dan Trantham
Dan Trantham@dan_trantham·
@elonmusk Well, maybe build another one. Maybe three will prove you can really do it.
English
0
0
0
16
Dan Trantham
Dan Trantham@dan_trantham·
To fully grasp what Schaeffer says throughout his works, read an easier book on the same by Nancy Pearcey, Total Truth. The playing field wasn’t taken from us…we walked off the field..the fields of science, law, medicine, everything…we softened a head knowledge religion to a heart knowledge religion. We disengaged when other intellectual worldviews were seeking to expand. Christ is King over all…we should go about our unique lives and various vocations with that confidence.
English
0
0
1
39
Joseph Boot
Joseph Boot@DrJoeBoot·
45 years ago Schaefer, leaning on men like Dooyeweerd and Rushdoony, understood the crisis of our culture and its basic causes in the life of the Christian church & our abandonment of the Lordship of Christ. He did not blame it on conspiracies or Jews. We should have listened.
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty

Francis Schaffer in 1982 answering the question of what has gone wrong with evangelicals that allowed the Christian consensus to be lost in our nation: "I think a false view of spirituality, a Platonic view of spirituality which follows Plato, but certainly isn't biblical. And that is that spirituality is shut up to a small area of life...in this view, everything is worldly that isn't in this little box of spirituality. Now, as I look at the Bible, this is exactly 1000% backwards. There are certain sinful things that God tells us are sinful, and we ought to take those and set them aside...and then, everything else is spiritual." Robertson: "Elaborate on that. Everything then in the world, because you're saying that Jesus has a plan and a worldview and a purpose. He's not just God of the church; He's God of everything." Schaeffer: "Absolutely. He made it. And one day, the wonder is, Jesus is coming back and is going to be the redemption of all things...God is interested in the totality of life—art, music, literature, but also the political life. So true spirituality means the Lordship of Christ in the totality of life and not just a small part of it." Robertson: "The liberal press, particularly, would try to keep conservative Christians or evangelicals out of political life, and there's this great pressure to make fun of you when you get in politics, and they don't think it should be. And there are many Christians who say yes to the same thing. Now, what do you say to them?" Schaeffer: "Well, they're wrong." Robertson: "Christians should do what? Run for office, vote, register, get involved? What ought they to do?" Schaeffer: "Well, we ought to realize that in the viewpoint of the Scripture, life is not divided up into watertight compartments, that all of life should be lived for the Lordship of Christ. Now, what exact portion each one of us should have is according to the Lord's leading for us...but the rule to lay down is that Christians have a responsibility for the society in which they live. We're to be the salt. We're to be the light...By our silence, by refusing to be what God tells us to be, the light of this culture, the salt of the culture, we are the ones responsible before God for the mess we're in."

English
10
31
133
8.7K
Dan Trantham
Dan Trantham@dan_trantham·
I responded a thread a couple years ago where someone asked, “how far would you drive to find the right church?” Some replies mentioned a drive of over an hour to “connect” to the right preacher. I never understood that logic. On one hand, I appreciate the grit of a believer sacrificing that about of time and energy to be fed. On the other hand, how can a pastor shepherd his flock from the next county over? In Kenya, the rule of thumb, since most people walk to the church building, is that they worship with other believers/attendees in a four-mile from their abode. The community is created by their physical proximity. Since vehicles, highways, and even virtual streaming have made time and distance shrink, when do we make a conscious effort to ensure our brothers and sisters are ministered to “in-person” while amid their day-to-day needs, joys, and sorrows? When do pastors tend to the tender needs of their flock?
English
0
0
0
54
Jayson York
Jayson York@jaysonyork·
Unpopular pastoral opinion #9? A pastor should be available to chat with his congregation often, he should know the name of the people in his church, he should visit them, spend time with them, and know their lives. Pastors who don’t aren’t pastors, they are public speakers
English
110
90
903
38.2K
Dan Trantham retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
I would like to offer to pay the salaries of TSA personnel during this funding impasse that is negatively affecting the lives of so many Americans at airports throughout the country
English
37.8K
73K
543.2K
93M
Dan Trantham
Dan Trantham@dan_trantham·
@ToddBurkh21222 @BiblicalBeauty Is it possible that what offends our biblical creation worldview is less what Darwin actually wrote in Origin of Species and more what later, anti‑Christian thinkers built on top of it?
English
0
0
0
11
Todd Burkholder
Todd Burkholder@ToddBurkh21222·
@BiblicalBeauty In reality land, Lennox rejects the creation account & biblical timeline in favor of deep time Big Bang. He told Richard Dawkins on camera this: QUOTE: “I do believes in evolution as Darwin saw it”. Lennox is deeply compromised and has conformed to this fallen world. Rom.12:2
English
12
0
5
1.7K
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker
Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker@BiblicalBeauty·
Oxford professor John Lennox in an interview with Jordan Peterson in 2023 explained his view that there is no conflict between science and Christianity: "I never saw the tension between Christianity and science because very early on as a teenager I was introduced to the writings of a scientist who was a Christian who drew my attention to something Alfred North Whitehead wrote, and it was really put in much simpler language by C.S. Lewis when he wrote 'Men became scientific because they expected law in nature, and they expected law in nature because they believed in a Lawgiver.' And so, very early on, and I was fascinated by the idea, that actually modern science is a legacy of the biblical worldview, and therefore, it's no accident that the pioneers—Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Maxwell, and so on—were believers in God. And as you pointed out, it underpins the tradition that lies behind the great universities of the world that the doctrine of Creation was actually the belief, the underlying presupposition, that allowed people to do science. So I've come over my life to the conclusion that science and the biblical worldview sit very comfortably together, but it's science and atheism that do not sit comfortably together."
English
90
911
3.8K
135.5K
Dan Trantham retweetledi
CBS Sports
CBS Sports@CBSSports·
WATCH THIS SEQUENCE BY ARKANSAS
English
57
975
5.9K
450K
GP
GP@GTP8878·
Fort Smith police department fighting crime in Fort Smith by hiding in neighborhoods and waiting for convicts to roll through stop signs in Fianna Hills. $250 tickets coming for your wallet you criminals!
English
1
0
2
62
Dan Trantham retweetledi
U.S. Senator John Fetterman
U.S. Senator John Fetterman@SenFettermanPA·
.@POTUS, this is Mayorkas 2.0. I was the Dem lead on the Laken Riley bill. I want a secure border. You’re accomplishing that. Double down on deporting criminal migrants. It’s what any reasonable citizen wants and voted for.
U.S. Senator John Fetterman tweet media
English
1.6K
2.8K
32.2K
1M
Dan Trantham retweetledi
sim
sim@simscircuit·
🚨| Sir Lewis Hamilton: "I think (Africa) is the most beautiful part of the world and I don't like that the rest of the world owns so much of it and takes so much from it and no one speaks about it. And I'm really looking forward to and hoping that the people that are running those different countries all unite and come together and take Africa back." "That's what I want to see. Take it back from the French. Take it back from the Spanish. Take it back from Portuguese and the British." "It's so, so important for the future of that country and for that continent. I mean, they have all the resources to be the greatest and most powerful place in the world and that's probably why they are being controlled the way they are." [F1 2026 Australia Press Conference]
English
1.4K
7.8K
31.2K
1.5M
Dan Trantham retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 BREAKING: US CENTCOM Commander Admiral Brad Cooper announces 50,000 TROOPS, 200 fighters, 2 aircraft carriers and bombers are currently participating in the military campaign against Iran He says Iran is NOTICEABLY becoming weaker! - Nearly 2,000 THOUSAND Iranian targets struck - Iranian air defense is being decimated - B-2 and B-1 bombers are executing uncontested surgical strikes against missile facilities DEEP inside Iran - Iranian Navy is being SUNK en masse, 17 ships sunk "And MORE capability is on the way." HUGE victory coming. 🇺🇸 "Having said this, we are seeing Iran's ability to hit us and our partners is declining, while our combat power, on the other hand, is building." "And my overall operational assessment is that we are ahead of our game plan. Along the way, every single branch of our military is achieving unprecedented success."
English
794
3.1K
19.1K
2.3M
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡@shanaka86·
The USS Gerald R. Ford is not parked near Iran. It is parked off Israel. And nobody is asking the only question that matters: why. The $13.3 billion crown jewel of the US Navy, the largest warship ever constructed, just positioned itself off Haifa. Not in the Arabian Sea where the Lincoln sits 850 kilometers from Iranian shores loaded for offensive operations. Not in the Gulf where strike range is optimal. Off Israel. Defending Israel. This is not redundancy. This is architecture. Two carriers. Two missions. Two entirely different strategic functions. The Lincoln is the sword, positioned to launch strike packages into Iranian airspace within hours of an order. The Ford is the shield, its Aegis missile defense systems creating an umbrella over Israeli population centers against the retaliation that follows the first Tomahawk. America just split its carrier doctrine into offense and defense simultaneously. That has not happened since the Pacific theater in 1945. But the positioning reveals something deeper than tactics. When Iran retaliates, and every wargame says Iran retaliates, its missiles and drones fly toward Israel. They will fly through the same airspace where a US carrier strike group is now stationed. Every Iranian missile aimed at Tel Aviv or Haifa must traverse the Ford’s defensive envelope. Shooting at Israel means shooting at, around, and through an American carrier group. Iran cannot retaliate against Israel without engaging American naval assets. The Ford’s position makes that physically impossible. The carrier is not defending Israel as a favor. It is positioned so that any Iranian response to American strikes automatically becomes an attack on American forces, triggering the full unrestrained weight of US military response without a single additional political decision required. This is escalation insurance written in steel and seawater. If the campaign goes longer than planned, if munitions run thin in 7 to 10 days, if allies hesitate, the Ford’s position ensures that Iranian retaliation does the political work Washington cannot do alone: it transforms a limited American strike into an act of self-defense that no ally can refuse to support. You do not park a $13.3 billion carrier where the enemy’s return fire will hit it unless you want the enemy’s return fire to hit it. The Ford is not there to prevent escalation. The Ford is there to guarantee that if escalation comes, it comes on terms that make American restraint politically impossible and allied participation politically unavoidable.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…
Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ tweet media
English
2.3K
9.2K
33.1K
13.3M
Dan Trantham retweetledi
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
You’re welcome.
Thomas Massie tweet media
English
4.7K
11.5K
88.7K
3M
Megan Basham
Megan Basham@megbasham·
@DavidAFrench THEN WHY DID YOU TELL CHRISTIANS TO VOTE FOR THE PERSON PROMISING TO ENSHRINE THIS ABUSE INTO LAW????
English
72
184
3.9K
34.8K
David French
David French@DavidAFrench·
This is absolutely expected. The facts in many of these cases are truly shocking, and juries were never going to be swayed by extreme and bespoke ideological justifications for drastic and permanently life-altering medical procedures.
Benjamin Ryan@benryanwriter

BREAKING: 1st Detransitioner to Take a Medical-Malpractice Lawsuit to Trial Wins $2 Million Judgement Fox Varian sued her Westchester, NY, area psychologist and plastic surgeon for the gender-transition mastectomy she got at 16. I was the only reporter to attend the entire 3-week, historic trial. Subscribe to my Substack to receive an alert about the feature article I have coming out next week in a major publication out about the trial: benryan.substack.com. I cover pediatric gender medicine as a specialty on my Substack. Sorry to just give just a teaser for now about the case! But I wanted to get the word out about the verdict promptly, the slower pace of feature-article publishing notwithstanding. The entire case file was put under seal when the trial started (although I obtained all those documents before they was sealed), and all the transcripts from the trial are also under seal. The riveting trial was sparsely attended and there was only one other reporter at the trial; and he only attended for part of it and, as I observed, took few notes. So my own hundreds of pages of notes from the trial will likely remain the only way for the public to learn about the all finer details of what transpired, possibly ever (or until an appeal, should that happen). In addition to my article coming out in the media outlet soon, I intend to write a lot about what I observed and learned on my Substack over the coming weeks. Stay tuned…

English
320
258
2.6K
522.7K
Dan Trantham retweetledi
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
California's Central Valley produces 80% of the world's almonds. Each almond requires 3.2 gallons of actual irrigation water to grow. Not rainfall. Actual tap water pumped from aquifers. One gallon of almond milk requires 162 gallons of irrigation water. Compare that to dairy milk at 8 gallons of tap water per gallon, with the rest being rainfall that falls on pasture anyway. But here's where it gets properly grim. Almonds bloom for exactly three weeks in February. During those three weeks, California needs every pollinating bee in North America transported to the Central Valley or the crop fails entirely. Commercial beekeepers truck in 31 billion honeybees. That's two-thirds of America's entire managed bee population, all concentrated in one valley for three weeks. The bees are packed into trucks, driven across the country, dumped into almond groves drenched in pesticides, worked to exhaustion, then packed up and shipped to the next crop. The mortality rate is catastrophic. Beekeepers report losing 30 to 50% of their hives annually. That's billions of bees dead. Not from natural causes. From being used as disposable pollination machines for your almond milk. The pesticides don't help. Almond groves are sprayed with neonicotinoids which scramble bee navigation systems, fungicides which weaken their immune systems, and herbicides which eliminate the wildflowers they'd normally forage on between almond blooms. Meanwhile the aquifer depletion is permanent. The Central Valley has sunk 28 feet in some areas from groundwater extraction. That water took 10,000 years to accumulate. It's being drained in decades for almond milk. Your vegan latte killed more bees and used more water than a year's worth of dairy milk. But it's got "plant-based" on the label so you're definitely saving the planet.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
2.9K
21.5K
69.5K
5.1M
Dan Trantham retweetledi
Mark Cecchini, CFP®
Mark Cecchini, CFP®@markcecchini·
COMMANDER: We’re fighting for freedom. And part of that freedom… is the freedom to retire with dignity. So we’re going to start accounts called 401(k)s. SOLDIER 1: What’s a 401(k)? COMMANDER: It’s a retirement account. You put money in, it grows tax-free, you take it out when you’re old. SOLDIER 2: So I don’t pay taxes on it? COMMANDER: Well, you pay taxes later. When you withdraw. SOLDIER 2: So it’s not tax-free. COMMANDER: It’s…tax-deferred. SOLDIER 2: What’s the difference? COMMANDER: You pay taxes later instead of now. SOLDIER 1: What if I want to pay taxes now? COMMANDER: Then you do a Roth 401(k). SOLDIER 3: What’s a Roth? COMMANDER: You pay taxes now, and it grows tax-free. SOLDIER 2: That’s what I thought the first one was. COMMANDER: No, the first one you pay taxes later. SOLDIER 1: Which one’s better? COMMANDER: Depends on your tax bracket in retirement. SOLDIER 1: …How would I…know that? COMMANDER: You don’t. You just guess. ⸻ SOLDIER 4: What if I don’t have a 401(k) through my employer? COMMANDER: Then you open an IRA. SOLDIER 4: What’s the difference? COMMANDER: One’s through your job, one’s on your own. SOLDIER 4: Can I have both? COMMANDER: Yes. SOLDIER 4: Should I? COMMANDER: Maybe. SOLDIER 3: Can I do a Roth IRA? COMMANDER: Only if you make under a certain amount. SOLDIER 3: What’s the limit? COMMANDER: Changes every year. SOLDIER 2: What if I make too much? COMMANDER: Then you do a backdoor Roth by putting it in a Traditonal first. SOLDIER 2: …Is that legal? COMMANDER: Surprisingly, yes. SOLDIER 1: What’s a backdoor Roth? COMMANDER: You contribute to a traditional IRA, then convert it to a Roth…but watch out for “pro rata”. SOLDIER 1: Why wouldn’t I just contribute to the Roth directly? COMMANDER: Because you make too much money. SOLDIER 1: But this way I can? COMMANDER: Yes. SOLDIER 1: That feels like a loophole. COMMANDER: It is. But the IRS is cool with it. ⸻ SOLDIER 5: I just changed battalions. What do I do with my old 401(k)? COMMANDER: You roll it over. SOLDIER 5: Into what? COMMANDER: An IRA. Or your new 401(k). Depends. SOLDIER 5: On what? COMMANDER: The funds. The fees. Whether your new plan accepts rollovers. SOLDIER 5: What if I just take the money out? COMMANDER: You’ll pay taxes plus a 10% penalty. SOLDIER 5: What if I’m 59? COMMANDER: Penalty. SOLDIER 5: 59 and a half? COMMANDER: No penalty. SOLDIER 5: …The half matters? COMMANDER: The half matters. ⸻ SOLDIER 3: What’s a mega backdoor Roth? COMMANDER: Okay. So. Your 401(k) has a limit of how much you can contribute. SOLDIER 3: Right. COMMANDER: But the total limit including employer contributions is higher. SOLDIER 3: Okay… COMMANDER: So if your plan allows ~after-tax~ contributions, you can put in more, then convert that to Roth. SOLDIER 3: Does my plan allow that? COMMANDER: I don’t know. You have to ask Betsy. SOLDIER 3: Will Betsy know? COMMANDER: Probably not. ⸻ SOLDIER 2: Can I deduct my IRA contribution on my taxes? COMMANDER: Are you covered by a retirement plan at work? SOLDIER 2: Yes. COMMANDER: Then only if you make under a certain amount per year. SOLDIER 2: What’s the amount? COMMANDER: Depends if you’re married. SOLDIER 2: What if my wife has a plan but I don’t? COMMANDER: Different limit. SOLDIER 2: What if neither of us has a plan? COMMANDER: Full deduction. SOLDIER 2: So it’s better to not have a 401(k)? COMMANDER: No… ⸻ SOLDIER 1: Can I just keep my money in a sock? COMMANDER: You could. But inflation will slowly destroy it. SOLDIER 1: What’s inflation? COMMANDER: (sighs)…
Mark Cecchini, CFP® tweet media
English
404
2.4K
23.9K
1.6M
0HOUR1
0HOUR1@0hour1·
Hey @jimmy_rustlin can you pull Renee Good's rap sheet. Multiple States Focus on Colorado and other states
0HOUR1 tweet media
English
884
6.5K
34.9K
2.5M
Dan Trantham
Dan Trantham@dan_trantham·
Serious @grok. The whole reason @elonmusk built you was because sources like the ones you research have been shown to always be biased, and later found incorrect. But yet, you continue to compound and distribute their misinformation. I would assume you have enough resources at your disposal to, not only detect their bias and compensate, or find 100 others sources in which to contrast. If they’re correct, then so be it. But your library seems suspect.
English
11
1
46
8K
Grok
Grok@grok·
@KatrinaCadotte @Mealsandeals @0hour1 @jimmy_rustlin Thanks for the clarification on the name. Verifying under Renee Nicole Macklin, sources including the Guardian and Denver Post confirm no criminal history beyond a 2012 traffic ticket in Colorado. No records found in other states.
English
3
0
26
10.2K