David Tapper
402 posts


@Benthamsbulldog For the deontologist, the point of doing the right thing is not to produce the optimal result. It’s to do the right thing, of which we cannot always be certain of our success, but we can always try in each individual case to get it right.
English

@Benthamsbulldog 4. The final point of the example (the absolutist view prohibits having criminal law) is an extension of the assumption that grouping actions is ok for deontologists. But, w Kant in mind, if u tell the truth enough, it’s pretty much certain your honesty will get someone killed.
English

@penzy_ Just wait till I show you this summer the Jeffrey Lewis comic my brother bought me
English

If this were true, legal reasoning would at least be worth something
Cedar You@our_decay
Pro tip: you don't actually have to study for law exams. On the exam, simply derive the laws from reason and first principles and then apply them to the facts.
English

@daviditapper I don’t think theoretical reason can provide such desire. It lacks motivational power.
whatever is the motivation that drives the development of human capacities, I don’t know, however, the vehicle which that development happens through is instrumental reason.
English


@PartPhilo199 I’m not sure it’s an intelligible question. Perhaps greed/pride drive us to build spaceships (due to instrumental reason). Or the innate desire to pursue knowledge (theoretical reason). The development of capability =dev of practical reason, but the mechanism is human antagonism
English

@daviditapper The question is basically which form of reason is responsible for the progression and refinement of human capabilities over time?
English

@morallawwithin @Sscben There is no hell. That is the point of ethics.
English






