David Dadisman

8.1K posts

David Dadisman

David Dadisman

@dcdadisman

Troutman, NC Katılım Nisan 2009
1.5K Takip Edilen888 Takipçiler
David Dadisman retweetledi
RNC Research
RNC Research@RNCResearch·
.@ScottJenningsKY: "Democrats don’t want to have any funding or enforcement of our immigration laws. For this fiscal year... Department of Homeland Security has been shut down 50% of the time… and in both cases it was Democrats frankly just throwing a fit... about immigration."
English
28
228
1.1K
18.4K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸@Bubblebathgirl·
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) is called out to his face by ABC for keeping DHS shutdown when ICE is already funded: “ICE already has the money… you’re holding up the entirety of the DHS... You’re holding up... that’s just a fact.” Watch Van Hollen squirm!
English
8
74
319
5.3K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Brian Sullivan
Brian Sullivan@SullyCNBC·
2 refinery closings makes the state ultra-reliant on imported fuel from giant diesel burning ships. That fuel now costs more due to the war. Pipelines into the state will happen but will probably be tied up in lawsuits and take a very long time. California left itself vulnerable to supply shocks and that’s exactly what we got.
Patrick De Haan@GasBuddyGuy

San Francisco has become the first U.S. city to see an average gas price of $6 per gallon, according to GasBuddy data. It's the first U.S. city to reach the mark since 2022, with average diesel prices in SF pushing past $7.75/gal today.

English
17
17
136
13.6K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷
Bernie this message is beyond retarded. The top 1% in the US pay ~40% of all federal individual income taxes. I'm not in the 1% - far from it - yet objectively it's extremely obvious that the top 1% IS NOT THE ISSUE. The issue is the way government DEPLOYS the revenue it takes in. THE US HAS A SPENDING EFFICIENCY ISSUE. And it's 100% rooted in its politicians BEING TERRIBLE AT THEIR JOBS. This includes you. Stop gaslighting the public.
Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷 tweet media
English
61
105
1.3K
12.7K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Overton
Overton@overton_news·
CBS viewers are not going to like this one. A smug Margaret Brennan tried to pin the DHS shutdown on President Trump — Tom Homan instantly SHATTERED that narrative right to her face. BRENNAN: “Why wasn’t the White House able to get both heads of the party the president controls on the same page?!” HOMAN: “Look, I’ve been up on the Hill. I’ve been in these meetings. I’ve met with lawmakers on both sides. This isn’t a White House issue. This is the Democrats shutting down the Department of Homeland Security. I’ve been in these meetings—” Brennan interrupted. BRENNAN: “So did you support the Republican bill in the Senate that passed?” HOMAN: “I support Congress opening up the ENTIRE government, the entire DHS, and not holding people in DHS hostage because they don’t like immigration enforcement.” BRENNAN: “So, no. You weren’t on board with the Senate bill?” HOMAN: “I’m with the president.” BRENNAN: “Okay…”
English
43
263
1.9K
205.5K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Western Lensman
Western Lensman@WesternLensman·
Cory Booker says he wants new leadership in America that will focus on unity. “We are not each other's enemies." This messaging attempt is so hilariously bad. Major Dems like Rice, Pritzker, Jeffries, Newsom and many others are openly calling for reprisals and prosecution of members of the Trump administration and anyone who dared cooperate with it. That’s where the party *really* is. Spartacus won’t be asked about that, though.
English
783
595
2K
74.6K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Guy Benson
Guy Benson@guypbenson·
No Kings.
Guy Benson tweet mediaGuy Benson tweet media
English
796
5.7K
39.2K
470K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Larry Goldberg
Larry Goldberg@TeslaLarry·
The NYT claims that their reporters produce "insightful, fair reporting that illuminates audiences everywhere." No they don't. They produce reporting that "two sources familiar with ..." and - funny, but not funny - those sources are always unnamed and unidentified. And this is considered - by archaic standards - legal and defensible. It's time to end the charade. Reporters should be made responsible - not to their editors - but to the public. That, after all, is the public they serve. And their targets should be given the same rights and protections as their accusers. Why should the accusers get the privilege of making unexamined accusations in public without being held accountable?
NYTimes Communications@NYTimesPR

Jason, business leaders from your industry and others speak to The New York Times, as they have for years, because our reporters produce insightful, fair reporting that illuminates audiences everywhere. We're not publicists and we're not promoting anyone's pitch deck.

English
23
54
851
78.2K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY SMOKES!! Speaker Johnson just told the Senate to SCREW OFF, he's NOT passing their DHS funding deal that leaves out ICE "This GAMBIT that was done last night is a JOKE! It CAN'T be that every Senate Republican read the language of this bill!" 🔥🔥🔥 Johnson then READS where the bill says ICE won't get funded "WE'RE NOT DOING THAT and it is unconscionable to me that the Democrats would force some sort of negotiation at 3 o'clock in the morning and try to hoist this upon the American people and then get on their JETS and GO HOME for their holiday and pretend and think that we're going to go along with that!" FIGHT HARD MAGA MIKE
English
3K
15.8K
60.7K
1.9M
David Dadisman retweetledi
Agarwal for Congress
Agarwal for Congress@ethanagarwal·
Nice try Ro. I'm my own candidate, and you're a hell of a lot richer than I am. When you talk about "elite impunity", do you mean like the impunity from 149 conflicts of interests for insider trading that the New York Times accused you of? When you talk about treating women and girls as dispensable, are you talking about when you brought a Epstein solicitor as your special guest to the State of the Union? When you talk about "the billionaire's candidate", are you talking about yourself, who has accepted money from Peter Thiel and more billionaires than any other Congressional candidate ever? Sit this one out.
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna

The billionaire's candidate who is upset I am standing up to the Epstein class and a culture of elite impunity that treats women and girls as dispensable.

English
30
255
1.8K
57.6K
David Dadisman retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Senator Thune, At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP. Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept. You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to. You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to. You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to. Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats. Let's be precise about what you did: 1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer. 2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM. 3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding. The precedent you set: You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. That the 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins. But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered: • Voice vote to avoid accountability • Empty chamber to avoid debate • Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny • Immediate recess to avoid questions You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one. What you've actually accomplished: Democrats demanded ICE restrictions. They got ICE defunded. Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded. And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning. The question you should answer: Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM? Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record? You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like. Here's my message: We saw it anyway. Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome. Own it.
English
5K
32.5K
76.3K
1.2M
David Dadisman retweetledi
@jason
@jason@Jason·
NYT shaken by my advice to founders to never talk to their journalists. The truth is, no one trusts the media, and it's their own fault. Too many anonymous sources, too many hit pieces and far too much bias. The NYT isn't taken seriously, except by the far left -- and they're even losing them of late! For leaders wondering whether to go direct, understand that the average NYT story gets 100-400k views. A breakout might do a couple of million. In other words, the average NYT story is irrelevant when compared to the number of followers and listeners a founder can reach directly.
@jason tweet media
NYTimes Communications@NYTimesPR

Jason, business leaders from your industry and others speak to The New York Times, as they have for years, because our reporters produce insightful, fair reporting that illuminates audiences everywhere. We're not publicists and we're not promoting anyone's pitch deck.

English
148
239
3.3K
157K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
🚨 John Thune is getting absolutely HAMMERED online Senate Majority @LeaderJohnThune fled Washington right after ramming through a weak DHS funding bill that fully funds TSA but deliberately excludes ICE and CBP. ... and The SAVE America Act ignored.
English
3.9K
8.7K
23.7K
234.8K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
Reporter: How do you feel about the Iranian Foreign Minister accusing the US and Israel of genocide? Marco Rubio: The Iranian? He's an expert in genocide. They've killed thousands. Every problem in the Middle East is Iran. Hezbollah? Iran. Shia militias destroying and threatening Iraq? Iran. Hamas? Iran. Houthis? Iran. Assad in Syria? Iran. Everywhere you turn, they're behind all of it.
English
422
4.4K
26K
859.1K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸@Bubblebathgirl·
Gov. Tim Walz slanders ICE: “These guys aren’t doing a damn thing. They weren’t qualified to be here in Minnesota, they’re not qualified to be at the airport.” Today, DHS released video of an ICE agent at JFK saving the life of a one-year-old child who was suffocating. In late-February, a 4-year-old boy was rescued by off-duty ICE agents in Massachusetts after he fell into a hotel swimming pool and nearly drowned. ICE agents are qualified to be real heroes both on and off the job. It’s time they get the respect they deserve. (RNCResearch on 𝕏)
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸@Bubblebathgirl

Watch as a truly heroic ICE agent at JFK springs into action when he sees a child struggling to breathe. CCTV captures the moment when people were waiting in the TSA Precheck line and the one-year-old child went limp. The dad panicked, and the ICE agent ran over and performed the Heimlich maneuver on the child, who soon started breathing again. EMS checked out the child and cleared them for flying. (DHSgov on 𝕏)

English
68
490
2.2K
43.1K
David Dadisman retweetledi
RNC Research
RNC Research@RNCResearch·
.@TMZ making sure you saw Democrat socialist Bernie Sanders living large on his first class flight out of DC while he forces Americans to go without pay.
RNC Research tweet media
English
1.7K
6.4K
25K
1.8M
David Dadisman retweetledi
Overton
Overton@overton_news·
Mask off moment. Speaker Mike Johnson QUESTIONS whether Senate Republicans actually read the bill they passed to the House before heading on recess. Johnson then turned to the cameras and read a jaw-dropping section aloud for the media. JOHNSON: “This gambit that was done last night is a JOKE.” “I’m quite convinced that it can’t be that every Senate Republican read the language of this bill, and I’m going to just read you one excerpt of it, because it’s pretty alarming, and it says everything that you need to know.” “In section four…this is on page two of the bill….” “It says, ‘The contents printed under the headings of this bill, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and border security operations under the heading of US Customs and Border Patrol and Protection shall have no force or effect for purposes of this act and amounts specified in the final bill under the subheading border security operation, and under the heading U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and under the headings of US Immigration and Customs enforcement, in the Department of Homeland Security shall be...ZERO.’” “We’re not doing that.”
English
654
6.2K
25.3K
1.3M
David Dadisman retweetledi
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
Oh, so there are corruption scandals, a public safety crisis, a breakdown of basic services, and the city council is considering pay raises Pray for Oakland, it's not getting better until people vote for actual common sense instead of whatever this is nypost.com/2026/03/26/us-…
Garry Tan tweet media
English
22
23
174
10.8K
David Dadisman retweetledi
Benny Johnson
Benny Johnson@bennyjohnson·
Nick Shirley asks why Gavin Newsom is attacking him for exposing fraud in California: “How sick does a governor have to be to say that the kid exposing the fraud is the bad person versus the fraudsters that are stealing the money?” Excellent question.
English
1.5K
22.1K
116.4K
1.1M