Dan Curwin

2.3K posts

Dan Curwin banner
Dan Curwin

Dan Curwin

@dcurwin

Volt-Age Doctoral Fellow & PhD Student @Concordia’s Next-Generation Cities Institute & Climate Business Institute

Montréal, Québec Katılım Şubat 2014
576 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Dan Curwin retweetledi
Tim Latimer
Tim Latimer@TimMLatimer·
I think it’s practically self evident that this is the value maximizing outcome for society and we should really be thinking about grid planning through a totally different lens.
Jane Flegal@JaneAFlegal

We should treat electricity as a growth platform (like highways, broadband) rather than a commodity to be tightly balanced at least cost. The federal agenda would then shift from “optimize around forecast demand” to “build abundant capacity and let growth come to it.”

English
8
11
103
12.3K
Dan Curwin
Dan Curwin@dcurwin·
Why do pipeline projects stay in limbo for so long in Canada even though no one benefits from this uncertainty: Financing energy futures: the contested assetization of pipelines in Canada, by @amyjanzwood: doi.org/10.1080/096922…
English
0
0
1
111
Dan Curwin retweetledi
Neil Renic
Neil Renic@NC_Renic·
This coffee should give me the anxiety I need to work effectively
English
2
37
485
21.1K
Dan Curwin retweetledi
Travis Kavulla
Travis Kavulla@TKavulla·
Cool map from @NERC_Official out today showing drivers of electricity demand growth by region -->
Travis Kavulla tweet media
English
6
42
161
21.2K
Dan Curwin retweetledi
Neil Renic
Neil Renic@NC_Renic·
Getting too excited at the scholastic book fair is a dangerous slippery slope to a PhD
English
8
114
1.2K
37.5K
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD@MushtaqBilalPhD·
@drrobcincotta Found this thread helpful? 1. Scroll to the top and repost the first post to share it with your friends. 2. Follow me for more threads on how to use AI apps for academics purposes.
English
1
0
6
2.9K
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD
Mushtaq Bilal, PhD@MushtaqBilalPhD·
How to integrate Claude with Zotero (using MCP):
English
5
49
281
63.6K
Dan Curwin
Dan Curwin@dcurwin·
@jglarusso Not sure if Sunamp is selling in the US but their tech looks cool
English
0
0
1
44
Joe LaRusso 🔌 🕳🐇
Joe LaRusso 🔌 🕳🐇@jglarusso·
Folks have any opinions on hybrid heat pump hot water heaters versus straight-up heat pump hot water heaters? I need to replace a conventional gas hot water heater.
English
6
1
0
461
Dan Curwin retweetledi
Susie Dent
Susie Dent@susie_dent·
Word of the day is 'spuddle' (19th century): to be extremely busy whilst achieving absolutely nothing.
English
369
2.6K
18.5K
1.2M
Dan Curwin
Dan Curwin@dcurwin·
Some cool First Nations #SMR news: @WECNuclear and the North Shore Mi’kmaq Tribal Council (NSMTC) have signed an MOU to promote the selection and deployment of Westinghouse technology for nuclear new-builds in New Brunswick: ebmag.com/westinghouse-a…
English
0
0
0
143
Dan Curwin
Dan Curwin@dcurwin·
@acagamic Merry Christmas and thanks for the all of the content/resources!
English
0
0
1
79
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD@acagamic·
Pick systematic when: → You need thorough certainty → Time isn't the main factor → Quality is everything Pick rapid when: → You need quick insights → Time drives decisions → Good enough works Don't overcomplicate this. Your timeline decides. Source: Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x Which review type fits your project? Join 6,913+ researchers if you like snack-sized research tips like this: go.lennartnacke.com/newsletter Have a great day and repost this.
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD@acagamic

A systematic review requires exhaustive, comprehensive searching with quality assessment criteria, while a rapid review can be completed with time-limited formal quality assessment. The difference is months of work. According to this paper, 14 literature review types exist. If you get started, focus on 2 main types: Systematic reviews → exhaustive analysis Rapid reviews → quick assessment

English
3
1
12
2.7K
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD@acagamic·
A systematic review requires exhaustive, comprehensive searching with quality assessment criteria, while a rapid review can be completed with time-limited formal quality assessment. The difference is months of work. According to this paper, 14 literature review types exist. If you get started, focus on 2 main types: Systematic reviews → exhaustive analysis Rapid reviews → quick assessment
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD tweet media
English
10
193
670
62.2K
derek guy
derek guy@dieworkwear·
the photos of Pharrell in the new GQ are pretty great
derek guy tweet mediaderek guy tweet mediaderek guy tweet mediaderek guy tweet media
English
86
115
3.4K
261.7K
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD@acagamic·
Academic jargon is suffocating your understanding of concepts. Your writing lacks depth because you don't understand these terms. I've got your solution: Repost & reply 🎓 I'll DM you this handy guide in Google Sheets to explain scientific terminology (must be following).
Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD tweet media
English
240
507
1.9K
288.6K
Dan Curwin retweetledi
Duncan S. Campbell
Duncan S. Campbell@duncancampbell·
solar panels are an amazing technology
Duncan S. Campbell tweet media
English
16
39
434
29.6K

Keşfet

@DavidWCochrane @amyjanzwood @Noahpinion @grok @NERC_Official @MushtaqBilalPhD @drrobcincotta @JigarShahDC