午夜將至

5.2K posts

午夜將至

午夜將至

@ddplayerUKK

Clarington, Ontario Katılım Eylül 2017
139 Takip Edilen2.3K Takipçiler
午夜將至
午夜將至@ddplayerUKK·
而且看起來你國根本沒解決回收火箭的凸優化問題。
中文
0
1
4
411
午夜將至
午夜將至@ddplayerUKK·
蘇聯的火箭技術當年和美國並駕齊驅,Saturn V之前基本上是壓美國一頭的,R180這個東西讓ULA能20年不思進取。然後21世紀的新蘇聯,舉國之力追趕美國私人航天10年前就完善的技術,而且還是個別人根本看不上的技術。
のらいぬ@JapanBanZaiLove

中國一家教育機構組織學生嘲笑日本的重複使用型火箭測試沒有中國的厲害… 中國人為了反日,下限還能有多低? 🤡🤡🤡

中文
5
1
11
1.9K
午夜將至 retweetledi
J
J@JayTC53·
I did not know Lindsey Graham served 33 years in the United States Air Force and retired a colonel earning a bronze star. Love him or hate him, without a doubt Lindsey Graham was a patriot who served America for 3 decades. Then 2 more decades in the senate. Graham loved America, that I can tell. 🇺🇸
J tweet mediaJ tweet mediaJ tweet mediaJ tweet media
English
879
2K
15K
809.8K
午夜將至
午夜將至@ddplayerUKK·
這就是激進左翼沒什麼前途的原因,本質上是靠當年克林頓時代如日中天的全球化和後冷戰時代的罕見平穩期堆積起來的,字面意義上的沒有繼承人。
More Births@MoreBirths

The childbearing gap has exploded to almost 4 to 1 between young white Republicans and young white Democrats. That shows that the roots of the low birthrate crisis, and its solutions, lie much more in culture than in economic conditions.

中文
0
4
43
2.7K
午夜將至
午夜將至@ddplayerUKK·
美國軍事換代期而已,軍事方面的投入在非戰爭時期都是純粹的燒錢,像美國這樣維持世界帝國保持強大的常備軍在歷史上才是極少出現的情況。對比蘇聯你中實在是連影子都摸不到,現在眼看就是軍艦要銹在海港習主席連軍隊人事問題都解決不了。
失业观察日报@dutyge

为什么美国再也造不出让人眼前一亮的军工产品了? 星链就是改变俄乌战场形态的产品,东大很想追赶拥有,但到目前看不到希望。

中文
3
5
48
5.3K
午夜將至
午夜將至@ddplayerUKK·
這也是為什麼美國不願意用海軍護航的模式的原因,也是後續為什麼草草收場的重要誘因,如果歐洲中國日本對海峽封鎖都毫無意見那為什麼美國還要上心呢。
planefag@planefag

It's incredible to me that this hasn't been more widely talked about. With US forces having thrashed Iran's conventional military capabilities threatening the strait - especially shore to sea cruise missile batteries and their Navy - there were two options for transiting the strait. The first was joint convoy ops, which are expensive, hated by both the civilian shipping companies and the national Navies that run them, but undeniably effective. The second was to simply run the gauntlet while under the umbrella of US airpower and/or light forces (the Gulf States have a vested interest in seeing oil transit the strait and have no shortage of light patrol craft well-suited to fending off various kinds of drones.) Since no civilian shipping company is going to run that kind of risk - especially in the modern age, when the innate risks of sea travel have been mostly mitigated and margins are often cut razor-thin - this means standing up their merchant marine. Every nation implements their merchant marine differently, both practically and legally, but it boils down to government-owned cargo ships with government-employed crews on board, moving cargo at state orders for national security rather than for some private company's bottom-line. Europe, notably, has refused to do either of these things, even as they face down diesel and jet fuel shortages; to say nothing of increased pressure on LNG prices. Unsurprisingly, the US wasn't interested in running its fleet ragged with regular convoy ops to benefit the Europeans as their own navies sat snug in harbor. What we did instead was stand up a kind of erstaz merchant marine - a small fleet of ships that transit the strait under US air cover, fill up, exfiltrate, then offload to other empty tankers via ship-to-ship transfers in open water. This isn't supposition - it's the exact same method that Iran and others' "shadow fleets" use to bypass sanctions, and OSINT groups have watched them doing it for years (it's not hard to see two supertankers cozying up side-by-side on commercial satellite imagery, which just underlines how cowardly decades of refusal to actually enforce sanctions by seizing these ships has really been.) And those groups have observed non-Iranian, non-sanctioned ships doing exactly this for a few weeks now. Now we know why. As Sal notes, using a designated fleet of ships allows them all to be kept under American-provided emergency war insurance without the hurdle of doing paperwork for the whole world. But there's other benefits. For starters, the crews; the owner can pull off the normal crew and turn the ships over to American-supplied crews; merchant mariners, active-duty navy, or just civilians that leaped at a very generous contract. Then there's up-armoring and crew protection. It's not unusual for ships transiting piracy-prone waters to have a "citadel," like a panic-room that's equipped so the crew can still steer and control the ship from within. A steel-armored citadel (or multiple across the ship) is an obvious upgrade; as well as hiring additional crew trained in damage control and the extra equipment for them to use. All of this is quite expensive for any normal civilian line to pay for out of pocket; less so for the US government who only has to equip a finite, dedicated fleet in this way. As I've said before, big tankers are really robust ships against the kind of light warheads most drones deliver. The only exception is unmanned surface vessels that target the engine room/propeller shafts, but since they approach at 40 knots rather than 400 knots like a flying drone it's a problem you can solve with Contractor Carl in a RIB with 200 rounds of belted 7.62... or a Hellfire from a Reaper overhead. These are risks that a nation - and suitably compensated government employees who volunteered - can run that a civilian company would still shy away from. For national governments, a few welders with a truckload of RHA and a company's worth of Marines with belt-feds is cheap, compared to an air campaign over Iran to destroy ballistic and cruise missile launchers. But Europe couldn't even do that - so we did it for them.

中文
2
4
16
4.1K