amin

29 posts

amin banner
amin

amin

@deadmoten

critique of political economy and literary criticism | nssr alum | recovering afropessimist | reluctant arsenal fan

Katılım Mart 2018
397 Takip Edilen262 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
amin
amin@deadmoten·
account randomly got (i think permanently) suspended for deleting old tweets using a third party app —old mutuals follow me here or on ig @/dankwilderson
amin tweet mediaamin tweet media
English
2
4
8
2K
amin
amin@deadmoten·
adam friedland and drumm discourse on my tl. better to combine them. was stringer bell engaged in productive labor?? are marlo’s corners a continuation of the plantation? is omar an interlocutor of moten’s marronage? whither slave in prestige tv
English
0
0
6
474
amin
amin@deadmoten·
i have issues with this book (very strange animosity towards said), but it is right about the overall point
English
0
0
8
369
amin
amin@deadmoten·
anybody read kevin ochieng’s red africa? im about half way through and i dont think its really any good. it’s not really about africa as much as it is settling academic scores (mostly badly). asad haider’s mistaken identity is much better in this genre
English
1
0
7
776
amin
amin@deadmoten·
account randomly got (i think permanently) suspended for deleting old tweets using a third party app —old mutuals follow me here or on ig @/dankwilderson
amin tweet mediaamin tweet media
English
2
4
8
2K
amin
amin@deadmoten·
@ennuixxx this is true. the only ‘convergence’ we got was epistemic
English
0
0
0
117
ennui.d
ennui.d@ennuixxx·
@deadmoten there's a bigger point to be made about science in general but, in particular, reflecting how US norms/incentives have become embedded in the global scientific community. the interdependence of Chinese science and US science mirrors the relationship of the economies as a whole
English
1
0
4
166
amin
amin@deadmoten·
@thundergoat22 yeah should’ve got more traction. usually when a book tries to be all over the place it’s not well done, but i appreciated this one. a mikedavisian effort
English
0
0
1
142
luis
luis@thundergoat22·
@deadmoten that book is a banger tbh
English
1
0
1
163
amin
amin@deadmoten·
there’s actually a much more fruitful (and serious literature) discussion on this in postcolonial studies. i can assure you christine lagarde doesn’t use adorno at the debt negotiation table
English
0
2
47
1.4K
amin
amin@deadmoten·
the funny thing about the rockhill stuff is the insinuation that the frankfurt school is at all relevant outside of an extremely narrow humanities cohort. leftists, like everyone else, don’t read anything, and if they do, it definitely isn’t negative dialectics
English
7
28
320
17.7K
amin
amin@deadmoten·
@NBAjeunefille was just having a laugh but i agree. rockhill is far worse and possibly reactionary
English
0
0
3
164
k
k@NBAjeunefille·
@deadmoten Hickel's not good but he's not nearly as bad as rockhill. Rockhill might be on "the right side of history" in the sense of generally being on the left but he's just wrong in the specific interventions he makes, whereas I think hickel is more often right
English
1
0
6
265
amin
amin@deadmoten·
funny thing about developmental types of marxists (of which i am still one in many ways) is they’re generally not literate in either their much derided “western marxism” or the literature on industrial policy, gvcs, etc etc. genuinely why read this ?
English
0
1
9
499
amin
amin@deadmoten·
the thing about timothy mitchell is he sometimes writes great books (colonising egypt) and he sometimes writes pretty bad books (carbon democracy) in a way that really requires doing the readings
English
0
0
4
398