dgnci x+

New study finds that Gen Z prefers buying levered semiconductor ETFs over having sex (Per @Yale)

@shiri_shh 👀

This video did 10M views in 24 hours. 100% made by Al. we're cooked 😭

Bro got caught spying for the russians and Iranians all within a week. Anyway, congratulations @JDVance on being a mentally ill moron

Good morning

Steady lads - deploying more hookers

Meanwhile on Instagram

Que mal año para ser un zurdo de mierda

Liberal “influencers” all over X right now: “What happened to your world peace President”? Iran murdered 30,000 protestors a few weeks ago. THIS IS the peaceful solution.

ZeroHedge is living proof that you can operate with a room temp IQ, successfully predict 84 of the last 2 recessions, and still somehow stumble your way to 2.5 million followers. It’s essentially astrology for men who believe everything is a conspiracy

Child: Dad, can I have $75,000? I want to buy a bitcoin. Dad: $73,000!? Where am I going to get $70,000. Do you think I have $68,000 just lying around? You gotta work hard to make $65,000.

True story.

😎

Not gonna lie, Vladimir Putin's speech at Davos is fire!

Watch this if you want to understand who María Corina Machado is—it’s a longer video, but worth it.

¿Y dónde están?

The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world. Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime. Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it. Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on “brown people,” Arabs, or “the Middle East,” as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine. This confusion is rooted in historical illiteracy. Western liberal media routinely collapses entire civilizations into a single stereotype: “all Middle Easterners are Arabs,” “all Arabs are Muslim,” and “all Muslims are a monolithic, oppressed identity group by white European colonizers.” Iranians disappear entirely in this framework. Their language, history, and culture—Persian, not Arab; ancient, not colonial; distinct, not interchangeable—are erased. By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely. There is another reason the Iranian uprising is so threatening to Western media is economic issues. As you know, Iran is not only a religious dictatorship. It is a centrally controlled, state-dominated economy where markets are strangled, private enterprise is criminalized or co-opted, and economic survival depends on proximity to political power. Decades of price controls, subsidies, nationalization, and bureaucratic micromanagement have obliterated the middle class and entrenched corruption as the only functional system. The result is not equality or justice. It is poverty, stagnation, and dependence on government’s dark void of empty promises. Covering Iran honestly would require acknowledging that these policies are harmful. They have been tried. They have failed. Catastrophically. This is deeply inconvenient for Western media institutions that routinely promote expansive state control, centralized economic planning, and technocratic governance as morally enlightened alternatives to liberal capitalism. Iran demonstrates where such systems lead when insulated from accountability and enforced by ideology. It shows that when the state controls livelihoods, non-conformity becomes existentially dangerous. That lesson cannot be acknowledged without undermining the moral authority of those who advocate similar ideas in softer language. Western liberal media prefers not to hear this. Acknowledging it would require abandoning the lazy moral categories that dominate modern discourse: oppressor and oppressed, colonizer and colonized, white and non-white. Iranian protesters do not fit. They show that authoritarianism is not a Western invention imposed from outside, but something many societies are actively trying to escape. That is what terrifies Western liberal media. And that is why the Iranian people are being ignored. So the silence continues.

Un'estrema sinistra che pretende di spiegare agli esuli venezuelani cosa significhi essere venezuelano lo considero surreale.