M.D.C.

7.9K posts

M.D.C. banner
M.D.C.

M.D.C.

@dennilay

I believe that the law of inertia, is at rest 🤣 🟢Pisces 🟠Rabbit 🎭 ✏️🖍 💉 IG: @denciomacoy

Manila Katılım Temmuz 2011
814 Takip Edilen515 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
Sugar?? 🍭 🍫 #workout
Português
2
0
17
3.2K
M.D.C. retweetledi
Gary Hensel
Gary Hensel@gary_hensel·
ZXX
77
1.8K
6.5K
539.9K
M.D.C. retweetledi
radar PH
radar PH@radarph_media·
Imagine finally landing a side hustle that helps pay the bills. Your weekdays are spent working for one company, while your evenings or weekends are dedicated to another. Then one day, your boss finds out, and suddenly you’re told you’re being terminated because you’re “moonlighting.” Can an employer legally fire you simply because you have two jobs? The short answer is: not automatically. Contrary to popular belief, Philippine labor law does not impose a blanket ban on holding multiple jobs. Having a second source of income is not, by itself, a just cause for dismissal under the Labor Code. Instead, what matters is how that second job affects your obligations to your primary employer. MOONLIGHTING IS NOT ILLEGAL The rise of remote work, freelancing, and the gig economy has made dual employment increasingly common. Many Filipinos work as virtual assistants after office hours, teach online on weekends, or run small businesses while keeping a full-time job. The Labor Code recognizes an employer’s right to protect its business, but it also protects employees from arbitrary dismissal. In other words, having two jobs alone does not automatically cost you your first job. WHEN THE SUPREME COURT SIDED WITH THE EMPLOYEE The Supreme Court clarified this principle in Philippine National Construction Corporation (PNCC) v. Maria Nympha Mandagan (G.R. No. 160965, July 29, 2008). Mandagan, a company lawyer, was dismissed after rendering legal services to another entity. However, the Court ruled that her dismissal was illegal. Why? The employer failed to prove that her outside work violated company rules or actually harmed the company. More importantly, management had long been aware of her outside legal practice, which the Court viewed as implied approval under the company’s own disciplinary policies. The ruling underscored an important principle: having a second job, standing alone, is not enough to justify termination. WHEN THE SUPREME COURT SIDED WITH THE EMPLOYER The opposite happened in Capitol Wireless, Inc. v. Carlos Antonio Balagot (G.R. No. 159937). In that case, the employee wasn’t dismissed merely because he had another job. He was fired because he was performing that second job during the same hours he was supposed to be working for his primary employer. He also used his employer’s motorcycle, fuel, and company time to carry out work for another employer. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal, ruling that such acts constituted serious misconduct and a willful breach of trust. It was clear that it was not the second job that violated the law—it was abusing the first employer’s time and resources. WHEN A SECOND JOB CAN GET YOU FIRED Labor experts say employers generally need to show that the second job caused a legitimate business problem before termination can be justified. These situations may include: - Working for a direct competitor, creating a conflict of interest. - Performing the second job during your official working hours. Using company equipment, vehicles, software, or confidential information for another employer. - Violating a valid exclusivity, non-compete, or moonlighting policy that forms part of your employment contract. - Even then, employers must still observe due process before terminating an employee. A DIFFERENT WORLD OF WORK The issue has become more relevant than ever. With salaries struggling to keep pace with inflation, many Filipinos have turned to freelancing, online selling, content creation, tutoring, and virtual assistance to supplement their income. For many households, having two jobs is no longer a luxury—it has become a financial necessity. The law recognizes that reality. While employers have every right to protect their business interests, the Supreme Court has repeatedly made it clear that an employee cannot be dismissed simply for earning extra income elsewhere. The decisive question is whether the second job compromises the employee’s duties, violates company policies, or causes actual prejudice to the employer. So if you’ve ever wondered whether having two jobs is enough to get you fired, Philippine jurisprudence offers a reassuring answer: Having two jobs isn't the offense. Violating your employer’s legitimate rights is. ✍️ Top Dagohoy #radarPHBusiness #radarPH
radar PH tweet media
English
0
12
19
1.6K
M.D.C. retweetledi
Bilyonaryo
Bilyonaryo@bilyonaryo_ph·
Singtel reaffirms Philippines commitment as tech venture workforce hits 1,200 Singapore Telecommunications (Singtel) has expanded the workforce of its Philippine technology venture more than eightfold to over 1,200 employees, deepening its bet on the country's digital talent pool. READ: bilyonaryo.com/2026/07/16/sin…
Bilyonaryo tweet media
English
0
1
8
1.3K
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
@inquirerdotnet Kung nabubuhay pa si Merriam, sinabon na ang mga prosecution. Ang yabang sa umpisa tapos laban -bawi nung nasa impeachment trial na. Diosmiomarimar
Filipino
0
0
0
22
Inquirer
Inquirer@inquirerdotnet·
Lead prosecutor and Batangas 2nd District Rep. Gerville Luistro announces that the prosecution will no longer call the following as witnesses in Article IV: - Representative from PNP Firearms and Explosives Office - Media personalities Mikhail Flores and Bonz Magsambol - Sheriff Abe Andres - Family member of a victim of threats - psychiatrist NBI Director Melvin Matibag will be the last witness in Article IV (grave threats). #VPonTrial | @AprBenjaminINQ Follow our live updates here: inqnews.net/SaraTrialJuly15 Watch the live stream here: inqnews.net/ImpeachmentJul…
Inquirer tweet media
English
2
1
2
2.2K
M.D.C. retweetledi
EnergyUp
EnergyUp@EnergyUp_·
Dear men If you want better sleep, recovery, hydration, and training energy, your fruit choices can help. 1.
EnergyUp tweet media
English
1
37
336
51K
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
Optics speaking, hindi na nga maganda na panay typos yung mga excuses ng witness stand sa trial, + you have prosecution team led by distinguished congressman were sitting idle- like flower vases and let their private lawyers do the work for them. Sarap ng buhay talaga oh
Filipino
0
0
0
22
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
No offense to the brilliant artist, it’s just a hype in socmed only to find out she got only a cameo role. The frame as if her character is too important in the series, turned out her exposure was too limited. Buti nalang I enjoyed watching the new season of the Avatar.
English
0
0
0
25
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
@OopsGuess So ano gagawin ni BBM? As usual, Makipag barda nalang ☕️
Filipino
0
0
0
152
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
China’s message to the Philippines is very simple: You do not get to gaslight China with a piece of paper China never accepted, never recognized, and will never treat as binding. Call it an “award” if it makes you feel important. Perform for Western cameras. Jump as high as you want. To China, it is illegal, null, void, and non-binding. A fantasy does not become law just because Manila keeps reading it out loud. Jump higher. It is still toilet paper with Western subtitles.
English
79
274
1.3K
77.7K
M.D.C. retweetledi
Musclez Tech
Musclez Tech@wellnezzCore·
This is exactly how a shoulder day should look 1.
English
6
116
1.2K
210.9K
M.D.C. retweetledi
Bilyonaryo
Bilyonaryo@bilyonaryo_ph·
Puregold president and bilyonaryo heir Vincent Co turned heads at the Puregold OPM Con Generations 2026 after making a rare public appearance at the packed Smart Araneta Coliseum. Read it here: bilyonaryo.com/2026/07/12/vin…
Bilyonaryo tweet media
English
0
18
64
5.6K
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
Ang cute cute ng mga trolls Infairness lol. Ang cute nila, maliban sa ang cute ng mga pictures, pati yung mga walang hulog na sagutan. Kung ano ano nalang terms 😆. At least .. Ang cute nila 🤪🤣
Filipino
1
0
0
62
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
@rapsquirrel0302 @maxence_ten @PhilstarNews Mentally-challenged” ? - dude you need a counseling. Dealing in X is not a proper venue for therapy. Ano sabi ko, you search- may google. Di mo alam? Makikipag palitan ka ng kurokuro tapos di mo alam ?
Filipino
2
0
0
90
Philstar.com
Philstar.com@PhilstarNews·
14 COUNTRIES RELEASE JOINT STATEMENT AFFIRMING 2016 ARBITRAL AWARD The Department of Foreign Affairs and 13 other foreign governments issued a joint statement on July 12, the anniversary of the arbitral award which recognized the Philippines’ claim over disputed parts of the South China Sea. “We reaffirm the Arbitral Tribunal’s decision that there is no legal basis for China’s expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea including those based on ‘historic rights,’ the statement read. According to the DFA, the governments of Australia, Canada, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, New Zealand, Romania, Slovenia, United Kingdom, and the United States of America have likewise released the same statement. 📷 DFA via Facebook
Philstar.com tweet mediaPhilstar.com tweet media
English
122
449
1.8K
485.9K
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
@rapsquirrel0302 @PhilstarNews Go ask yourself. There’s google. Di lahat spoon fed ang sagot. I’m expecting you know geopolitics. May engagement ka na nga eh, ako pa hahanapin mo sino ang belligerent vs China? 🫪🙄
Filipino
2
0
0
73
M.D.C.
M.D.C.@dennilay·
@maxence_ten Pag troll wag na maki-sabat. Wala ka nang picture sabat kapa ng sabat. Di pala epektibo ang foreign policy ni Duterte eh, so bakit mag effort mag explain? Kung tama ang ginagawa ng Marcos admin? Bakit ?? Hahaha
Filipino
1
0
0
40
Maxence Ten
Maxence Ten@maxence_ten·
@dennilay I’ve seen the thread and retweets. I therefore conclude that many of our Filipinos are either nincompoop or have no idea about complex geopolitics. Di ko maintindihan, ano mahihinita nila sa aksyon ng mga duterte na napatunayang hindi epektibo. Ego lang talaga gusto natin
Filipino
1
0
0
30