Debdeep

don't ignore the rage boiling inside you

Anthropic pays $750,000+ a year for engineers who can build LLM architectures from scratch. Stanford taught the entire thing in 1 hour lecture & released it for free. Bookmark & watch this today before someone takes it down.

Instead of watching an hour of Netflix, watch this 2-hour Stanford lecture on AI careers. It will teach you more about winning in the AI race than all the AI content you’ve scrolled past this year.

someone wrote a 680 page interactive book on cs algorithms

here for the comments

I’ve been saying this for years that Elon Musk is not a smart man, he’s a finesser. Until recently, he also hasn’t had that much money. What Elon represents is the pinnacle of what the world has become in the last 15 years, which is that branding of your story matters more than the reality of what you’re actually capable of. All of his companies are built off loans, funding and intellectual property of other engineers. Nothing of his own origin. But since he’s white, has a snobbish European accent, talks really fast like engineers, and has a colt following of rich kid fan boys.  he’s be come the Kanye West of business and technology by only a name and not skill.  We all went to school once with that kid who was a well known finesser, he seemed to know all famous people, he seemed to always have money and he seemed to always have a plan in motion but when you talk to him or her in detail, it’s a bunch of nothing…. That’s Elon Musk aka Mr. Big Nothing  

Elon Musk’s rabid dive into white supremacy has taken place in broad daylight and has been amply documented. It has been unsubtle and unvarnished. But in recent months Musk has flooded the zone with hundreds of direct tweets, quote‑tweets and reposts that amplified claims of “white genocide,” claims that white people would be “slaughtered,” and accusing Jews and other groups of “pushing hatred” against white people— the sort of thing that used to be confined to the far reaches of the white supremacist fever swamp. open.substack.com/pub/charliesyk…

If this filing is accurate, Elon tried to turn a lawsuit into intimidation theater. Threatening that Sam and Greg would become “the most hated men in America” because they refused to fold is beyond pathetic. I hope OpenAI beats him so badly in court that this whole ego lawsuit becomes radioactive.

Lmfao he knew he was about to get cooked

Sam Altman is kinda the young Dumbledore and Elon Musk kinda the young Grindelwald after they parted ways in their pursit of power. Also Dumbledore is gay and Grindelwald is far right and they both want the greater good (AGI) even if it disrupts the Muggle world (normies)

its time for independent media to shine

it's game theory the incentives and payoffs for being horrible human beings have lately been very high

my personal experience, can confirm also fat fucking sense of entitlement

im bullish on chatgpt and openai too

A content creator reveals that government PR reached out to her even before the news of LPG price hike broke, asking her to justify the price hike by comparing it with other countries

Elon Musk is the Ivar Kreuger of our time, and the OpenAI trial is PROVING it in real time. If you don't know who Kreuger was, you should: In the 1920s he was the most admired businessman in the world. The "Match King." He controlled 90% of global match production, lent money to sovereign governments, and his securities were the most widely held in America. But after his death in 1932, auditors spent 5 years untangling over 400 subsidiary companies and discovered the whole thing was held together with fictitious assets, forged bonds, and the unquestioning loyalty of people too dazzled to ask questions. Investors lost $750 million (~$17 billion in today's money). His deficits exceeded Sweden's national debt. Doesn't this sound familiar? The Musk playbook is the most DANGEROUS house of cards I've witnessed in my career. This week in federal court, Musk took the stand to argue that Sam Altman stole a charity. 3 days later he'd contradicted himself under oath so many times that the judge told his lawyers she suspected plenty of people don't want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands. OpenAI's attorney asked if Tesla is pursuing AGI. Musk said no. The attorney then pulled up Musk's OWN post from March 4 where he wrote Tesla will be one of the companies to make AGI. His own words entered into evidence against him. BY HIM. Then the attorney asked if xAI used OpenAI's models to train Grok (which violates OpenAI's terms of service). Musk called it a general practice among AI companies. Pressed for a direct answer, he said "partly." Think about that: Musk is in court accusing OpenAI of betrayal while admitting under oath that xAI violated the very same company's terms of service to build Grok. Then came the credibility test: Musk was asked to name his companies that benefit society. He listed Tesla, SpaceX, Neuralink, and X without hesitation. Every one of them is an uncapped for-profit enterprise. Then why did xAI start as a benefit corporation and quietly flip to a for-profit C-corp? No clean answer. This is someone who repeatedly launches entities with noble-sounding charters and converts them into for-profit corporations once the money gets serious. Then his money manager Jared Birchall took the stand: OpenAI's lawyer asked about the donor-advised funds at Vanguard and Fidelity that Musk used to send his $38 million. Did Musk have any legal right to direct where the money went once it entered the DAF? Birchall couldn't answer. Said the legal question was beyond his expertise. The entire lawsuit hinges on that donation creating enforceable obligations. But the man who managed Musk's money just told a federal jury he can't confirm Musk had any enforceable claim over those funds. Now step back... This is a man who promised full autonomy by 2018, a million robotaxis by 2020, and unsupervised FSD by June 2025. EVERY deadline was missed. He claimed he invested $100 million in OpenAI. The real number was $38 million. His defense? His "reputation" made up the difference. Kreuger had 400 subsidiaries and used one entity to prop up another through structures nobody could follow. Musk has Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, Neuralink, the Boring Company, and X. He shifts AI talent from Tesla to xAI, has xAI building the brains for Tesla's Optimus robot, and uses X as a megaphone while the algorithm amplifies his narrative to 200 million followers. Kreuger's investors trusted the man, NOT the math. They loved the confidence. They stopped asking questions because the aura of genius made questioning feel foolish. The same psychology applies to Musk's empire today. Kreuger's reckoning took 5 years of forensic auditing after his death. But Musk is providing his in REAL TIME: contradicting his own posts under oath, admitting to the practices he's suing others for, watching his logic collapse under cross-examination. Different decade. Different industry. Same ending. The truth always catches up.

@JimmyGoJump ok racist

@desibluedevil STFU Jeet

Elon Musk is a liar and a fraud

@OpChastise where

@desibluedevil Good come back

@OpChastise same to you

@desibluedevil Omg you're stupid.

@Sasanearr apply your brain

@desibluedevil How so? His point isn’t that OpenAI shouldn’t exist, it’s that it was supposed to be an open source nonprofit entity

country is just hip hop with the southern drawl