Destiny
312 posts


The Google Quantum AI paper is real—large quantum computers could crack exposed ECDSA public keys (as in Bitcoin/ETH spends) in ~9 mins using under 500k physical qubits.
Banking relies on the same ECC/RSA for TLS, signatures, and key exchanges, so encryption/auth breaks apply there too (e.g., intercepted sessions or forged certs). But banks run centralized systems with HSMs and internal controls, letting them roll out post-quantum upgrades faster than crypto's decentralized consensus and forever-exposed legacy keys.
Crypto's decentralization makes it "harder" today against traditional hacks, but quantum targets the math equally—neither wins here. Both need migration soon; Google targets 2029 for their own infra.
English

🚨GOOGLE JUST GAVE A DEADLINE TO EVERY CRYPTO HOLDER
Recently, Google Research published a paper on quantum computing, and it's terrifying.
Their latest research shows a quantum system could crack a wallet in 9 minutes.
Bitcoin blocks take 10 minutes, which means the gap is now dangerously small.
This changes how people look at security.
When you send a transaction, your public key becomes visible for a short time.
If a powerful system is watching, it can try to take over that transaction before it confirms.
This was once a far future risk.
Now it’s being treated as something that could happen this decade.
The scale of exposure is not small either.
Around 6.7 million BTC are already sitting in exposed wallets.
About 1.7 million BTC from early-era wallets cannot be protected at all.
And the same is for ETH and any other crypto that isn't quantum resistant.
But that's not all.
The resources needed to execute this have dropped from millions of qubits to under 500,000.
Because of this, the industry is now being pushed to upgrade faster.
Google is targeting 2029 for post-quantum security.
And if crypto fails to upgrade before this, it'll be a disaster.

English

@cryptorover @grok can you tell me what will happen to the banking system if quantum computing hacks it and is it better to hack btc or banks?
English

🚨 $274,000,000,000 IN BITCOIN SELL PRESSURE COULD HIT THE MARKET THIS DECADE.
And this conversation isn’t coming from retail traders.
It’s coming from early Bitcoin analysts and longtime market participants who’ve been in the space since the beginning.
The concern here is not short-term price moves; it’s about QUANTUM COMPUTING.
A growing group of OG holders believes quantum tech is no longer a distant risk.
They think that within the next 5-10 years, quantum systems could become strong enough to challenge current cryptographic security, the same security Bitcoin depends on.
And if that happens, Bitcoin becomes one of the most obvious targets.
Not because the network is weak, but because it’s transparent, holds massive value, and runs on public-key cryptography.
Now here’s where the real overhang comes in.
There are roughly 4 million BTC from early eras (pre-2011) that are inactive or assumed lost.
Markets currently treat those coins as permanently out of circulation.
But if quantum computing ever makes it possible to access those wallets, even partially, that supply could come back into the market.
And markets won't wait for those coins to move; they'll price the possibility early.
To understand the scale of dead coins moving:
Since 2020, institutions and corporations together have accumulated roughly 3 million BTC.
That demand helped drive Bitcoin from around $10K to above $120K at peak levels.
So the idea of 4 million BTC potentially re-entering supply creates a long-term supply risk overhang on price.
And yes, quantum-resistant upgrades are already being researched.
But Bitcoin upgrades require global consensus, which is slow and difficult by design.
So until quantum protection is fully implemented, this remains a background risk narrative.
Obviously this quantum computing is not an immediate threat. But it is significant enough to stop big players from going all-in on Bitcoin.


English

🚨THIS IS REALLY DISAPPOINTING
In the past 5 years, here are the returns of top assets:
Silver: +180%
Gold: +171%
S&P 500: +74%
Nasdaq: +61%
BTC: +35%
ETH: +7%
We took more risks, had the biggest regulatory developments and institutional adoption, and yet underperformed every asset class over the half-decade.

English

@Coins_Kid Can we buy anywhere in the buy zone or wait for it to touch the bottom of the channel
English

People were bullish on #bitcoin when the #voliquidty was sat in the sell zone.
Look where it's sat night now 👀
Just waiting ✋️ to see if it can flip green as it now sits in the buy zone.
Remember those that pick bottoms get smelly fingers.
DATA IS BOSS ⚠️

CoinsKid@Coins_Kid
There are people saying the bottom is in whilst #btc sits in the #voliquidty sell zone. I have never seen a bottom printed whilst #btc sits in the sell zone. It is usually triggered when #btc sits in the buy zone and flashes green. This data goes back to 2015 and has accurately called bottoms. You want to see that orange line trending below the dotted orange line and flipping blue 😬
English

@Coins_Kid @wemizz If we only had 1 data for top how many do we need to confirm bottom and can one data prove that the top was in now we know it was enough but back then it wasn't confirmed
English

Hey CKC,
I bet you are getting really annoyed by me showing you the things I'm waiting for to call the bottom on Bitcoin Every single day in the video updates, and for that I sincerely apologize!
I made a simple page here for you here coinskid.com/bitcoin-crypto…
It's a simple page to keep an eye on for yourself.
It's quite detailed and will hopefully help us all identify a bottom and great opportunity in #bitcoin and #altcoins.
Please remember #btc could bottom and get the hell out of here without even triggering any of these data points, however usually it doesn't, the first clue will be price structure going forward.
Thank you for tuning in CKC much love X

English







