David F. Flanders

Google announces: "With 1.5 Pro, #Gemini Advanced can process significantly more information, running up to **1 million tokens** – that's 1500 pages. <-- The latest race to the bottom for computing: CPU->RAM->Cores->Tokens

@jccardenas1965 @jpablofranco @CameronNeylon @CK_Karl_Huang @jpablofranco I'd like to ask some intelligent questions to the primary researchers in Colombia (Rocio del Pilar Moreno-Sanchez and Jorge Higinio Maldonado) so we might get their insights on how best to run our first experiment, esp latter rounds where sanctions can be imposed.

@jccardenas1965 @jpablofranco @CameronNeylon @CK_Karl_Huang may I request a joint zoom seminar to jointly read and review the cited paper by @jccardenas1965 to extract the principles which we would like to apply to our EEG on CPRs for Australian Researchers?

@jccardenas1965 know any researchers working on the influence of the moderator for Pareto outcomes in group field game experiment? #ostrom

If you are in Australia and would like to see if you'd like to pursue your PADI Freediving Certification, please give me a ping :)

Launching new SaltSessions pool training "tasters" for those who would like to take some challenges to test their #freediving skills:

Only #freediving dive camp on the southern coast where you can try full freediving gear! Google: SaltSessions #Melbourne instagram.com/stories/adamse…

UKRI Longform open access policy webinar for researchers and research organisations - 8th November.

"intrasystem goals come first"

@About_Memory Courtyard ideas from Brazil: archdaily.com/996566/brazili…

Future Leaders Fellowships (FLFs) aim to develop the next world-class research and innovation leaders. If you’re an early-career researcher or innovator looking to develop your career, an FLF could be for you. Here’s what you need to know⬇️🧵1/

How many University Chancellery teams are approaching their policy like an engineering company designing an airplane, or an open source project designing APIs? Uni policy remains a mediaeval process of heralding dictums from the balconies of ivory towers. 🎺 🥁 👑

How then do we know which researcher was able to optimise the amount of ARC funding they received? And what quasi sanctions could be put in place to encourage greater efficiency of ARC funding?

Let's play a game, with the following parameters: 1. Number of researchers = 10; 2. All researchers are paid equally and have equal scholarly standing, h-index = 5 3. All have shared values for equal rights to ARC funding; 4. All are part of the same discipline, same vocabulary

The irony of gov't analysis is the desire to count via granular measurement, e.g how many OA papers are published; where 'graduated sanctions' like zones and/or quasi boundaries provide approximation and lossy participation.

Why do institutions get policy so wrong? 1st: gross simplification of analysts for the permutations for policy implementation (mean: 75k game/policy situations); 2nd: 'rules without teeth' aka policy without sanction weakens the institutional commons.

@CameronNeylon these remind me of Ostrom's common good IAD action situation maps: where's the graduated sanctions to increase efficiency?