dhtong

5 posts

dhtong

dhtong

@dhtong

Katılım Nisan 2014
31 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
dhtong
dhtong@dhtong·
@0x121CL Interesting findings. How did you trace it? Can you post some transaction links for the transfers you mentioned?
English
0
0
0
13
0xCL
0xCL@0x121CL·
My previous post about Altura: x.com/0x121CL/status…
0xCL@0x121CL

Altura DeFi Earlier I read a detailed post by @morsyxbt about the past rebrands, funding claims and InfoFi campaign, so I decided to dig in after seeing 30%+ yield claims. As written by MorsyXBT the official @alturax page has been rebranded a few times. The account is based in Switzerland and has a few shady previous names, including Fitnacapita(l). It’s obvious that @FitnaEth is running the account, upon looking into Fitna’s history (0x408130934aDcE05d82d8dC3706e29d02d91CF886) it’s clear that he spends most time gambling and buying ENS names in the hopes of getting rich. Ranveer Arora Ranveer Arora, the founder of Altura, claims credibility by referring to his work at PwC and AllianceBernstein. According to the UK chamber of commerce Altura Defi Ltd has been registered on Nov 6th 2025. The sole director is Ranveer Arora, born in November 1989. Altura has been registered on the following address: Level One, Basecamp, 49 Jamaica Street, Liverpool, England, L1 0AH. Note that this registration occurred just three months ago, making this an new legal entity with no established operational history. Coincidentally, on the same address, another registration can be found by Ranveer Arora: Arora Logistics and Transport Ltd. This raises questions about operational focus and business legitimacy. From claiming on LinkedIn to have worked at PwC and starting his career as income strategist at AllianceBernstein in 2006 (which would make him 17 years old at the time). There’s absolutely no public mention of this logistics company anywhere on his LinkedIn profile or professional history. Why would someone with claimed high-level finance experience be simultaneously running a logistics company from the same virtual office address? Besides that, Arora shared a transaction on his X account showing that he entered the pre-deposit campaign with 25K of his own money, allegedly to demonstrate his confidence in the project: x.com/ranveerar89/st… The address in question (0x12f8F492ca503CA5505b67d42D63C91113E3D967) was funded via ChangeNow with no visible trace to inputs, indicating the funds were likely exchanged via XMR. This is particularly interesting given Arora’s own public statements about transparency being important in crypto. Other pre-depositors can be traced back to low-tier kols and little backing by big names within the scene. The lack of institutional or well-known crypto investor participation is a significant red flag for a project claiming to deploy $100M+ in capital. Inessa Holdings Altura claims to work with Inessa Holdings in a physical gold trading deal that supposedly generates part of the promised 30%+ annual returns (0.5% weekly). They claim to deploy capital up to 100M USD for the physical gold trade. Inessa in turn pays Altura a fixed 0.5% return per week on the deployed capital. This contract has been signed by Rajaram Natrajan on behalf of Inessa Holdings. There’s no professional record of Rajaram Natrajan in relation to Inessa Holdings anywhere publicly. No LinkedIn profile, no business registrations, no traceable professional history. For someone supposedly authorized to sign $100M contracts on behalf of an investment firm, this complete absence of digital footprint is highly suspicious. Looking at Inessa Holdings itself, it claims to be a private management firm specializing in trading RWA with a track record of 5 years+ and $450M assets traded/managed, impressive claims that would place them among established institutional players. Inessa Holdings itself has been registered 30-12-2024 in Dubai, already indicating that the claim of a track record of 5 years+ is false. Moreover, upon looking at web archives the claim of a track record can already questioned. Oct. 2024 this is what their site looked like, showcasing a vastly different approach to their ‘investments’. There’s no public names representing or data supporting Inessa Holdings, despite the vast track record claims. No team page, no verifiable leadership, no regulatory filings, no audit reports, nothing that would be expected from a legitimate firm managing hundreds of millions of dollars. Conclusion Alturax is not just a red flag, it is a high risk of complete loss with patterns consistent with a Ponzi scheme or exit scam. There’s no visible track records of the people involved, their online accounts have no visible track record apart from the main Altura X account, showcasing a dubious past to say the least. Moreover, the claims of a track record of 5+ years and managing $450M by Inessa Holdings are provably false, since they legally existed for only a year, and their historical website shows a completely different approach to their business. Ranveer Arora, CEO of Altura, funded his ‘transparent’ pre-deposit via Changenow, likely exchanging the funds from XMR, showcasing 0 transparency on that behalf. In the words of himself: if it’s not verifiable onchain, it’s just a story. By his own standard, Alturax is just a story, a story built on provable lies, obscured fund sources, and a partner company that didn’t exist until a year ago. Sources: …te.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/cDGae… …te.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/Omrsg… lei.bloomberg.com/leis/view/8945… x.com/morsyxbt/statu… web.archive.org/web/2024100920…

English
2
0
5
3.3K
dhtong
dhtong@dhtong·
@Main_St_Finance I want to believe you guys are solvent. Can you create some scheduled updates on this and when to expect next? Depending on the situation, some people might be open to investing more if risk / incentive is aligned.
English
1
0
2
98
Main Street
Main Street@Main_St_Finance·
Please be cautious about impersonator accounts and malicious links circulating right now. Only trust messages and links from @Main_St_Finance. If it's not from here, don't click and don't engage.
Main Street tweet media
English
4
1
6
8.4K
Main Street
Main Street@Main_St_Finance·
Mainstreet Update — Morpho, Proof of Reserves & Liquidity We want to address the current situation around the Mainstreet Morpho market and provide clarity. First and most importantly: Mainstreet remains fully backed. The recent shutdown of our third-party proof-of-reserves dashboard does not reflect any loss of assets or deterioration in portfolio quality. This is an infrastructure and reporting issue, not a solvency issue. As a result of the dashboard going offline, the oracle supporting the Morpho market is expected to pause within the next 24 hours. This has created understandable concern and triggered elevated borrowing rates as leveraged loopers rush to unwind positions. We are actively responding on multiple fronts: Engaging alternative proof-of-reserves providers to restore independent verification as quickly as possible. Continuing to unwind box spread positions and redeploy liquidity into the minter / Morpho ecosystem. Preparing to act as liquidity provider and liquidator of last resort if necessary to prevent disorderly market conditions. Over the past several days, we have already unwound our shortest-dated box positions and released free cash, with more than $8 million in USDC already transferred to the minter to support liquidity and assist with unwinds. Mainstreet’s core portfolio consists primarily of box spreads. These are structurally low-volatility positions designed to converge to fair value at expiry, making them highly predictable from a NAV perspective when held to maturity. However, box spreads are not always frictionless to exit early. Selling before expiry may involve: Transaction fees Wider bid/ask spreads Temporary market-maker discounts Liquidity-dependent haircuts based on expiry and position size This means that while our portfolio remains fully backed, converting positions into immediate liquidity depends on prevailing market depth and market-maker appetite. Our priority is clear: protect NAV while maximizing liquidity for the protocol. We are willing to accept elevated fees and modest execution costs to accelerate liquidity release, supported by the protocol insurance fund. However, we will not realize losses beyond the insurance fund purely to force immediate exits. If market pricing becomes materially irrational, we will allow positions to continue toward expiry and realize full value at settlement, as outlined in our risk disclosures and discussions with key partners. If borrowing rates continue to rise and liquidations occur, Mainstreet is prepared to step in as liquidator of last resort. As additional USDC is freed from box maturities and unwinds, part of that capital may be deployed to absorb and liquidate stressed Morpho positions to minimize bad debt risk. Weekend liquidity is currently limited, and market-maker quotes are materially less favorable than during normal trading hours, which temporarily slows execution. We expect to have a clearer picture over the coming days and will continue providing updates as progress is made. We understand this is a stressful situation and sincerely appreciate the community’s patience and trust. Our commitment remains unchanged: protect user funds, preserve NAV, and restore normal market conditions as quickly and responsibly as possible.
English
46
6
57
52.2K
dhtong
dhtong@dhtong·
@hankgreen Should we ban TikTok and allow douyin?
English
0
0
0
58
Hank Green
Hank Green@hankgreen·
Tiktok is banned in China, which makes this whole conversation almost otherworldly.
English
320
787
27K
2.6M
dhtong
dhtong@dhtong·
@KyleSamani @0xAvious @dazuck how do you manage doc folder structure? you can add links in good docs. however, google doc has its own location in the google drive. you might end up needing to manage two. in general, I find notion enables writers to keep readers in the same interface easily.
English
0
0
0
0
Kyle Samani
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani·
Why do you choose Notion over Google Docs for your startup? What are the 1-2 key things that Notion does much better?
English
112
4
149
0