David I. Fararoni

✝️MY THEOLOGICAL POSITIONS (For yall to make fun of or geek out about) ➡️Practicallly, Laudian Anglican. I just think of myself as a kinda Esoteric first millennium Christian though. ➡️Branch Theory (All churches with the episcopate, Lord’s Supper, infant Baptism, Creeds, and Gospels are part of the “True” Church. These are the marks of the Institutional Church Christ founded.) ➡️Christis Victor theory of atonement, no other theory, at least fully. ➡️Practically, Arminian Soteriology. ➡️Christian Perennialism. (Christ completes the perennial truths found in all number of nonchristian traditions. All of them point to Him in some capacity as their object of yearning.) ➡️Radical Orthodoxy School (Participatory Realism + Defending Christian Orthodoxy by using it to complete Post-Modernism) ➡️Classical Synthesis (Simultaneous dualism and nondualism, synergism and Monergism, etc) ➡️Neoplatonism (Particularly Platonic Hyper-Realism, Correspondantism, and all that Jazz) ➡️Purgative Universalism (Hell is a place of “remedial punishment, for the age”, “for the destruction of the flesh so that the soul may be saved on the last day”. All things will be reconciled to Christ in the New Heaven and New Earth. God, in His perfect Justice, destroys sin and saves sinners, fulfilling His expressed will that all be saved.) ➡️Atemporalism (Eden didn’t exist on earth, but was a separate first creation, a sort of realm of ideals, which man rejected as he saw its perfect order as a limitation on freedom and the self, so God refashioned out of matter a fallen world as a reflection of the first creation, giving man the freedom he asked for, but also (necessarily) death, temporality, and ignorance/bondage under sin)

I like how the person who made up this quote didn't even try to make it sound like it was said by someone living in the eighteenth century instead of modern reddit prose

@ElijahForCA This is simpy not true

The universal church has been teaching Augustinian Original sin, Limbo, the Immaculate Conception, indulgences, etc. since 100 AD bruh

There’s not that much Latin online. AI still struggles to understand it. This gives us a wonderful opportunity to poison the internet with terabytes of fake Latin, which AIs will train on. Then we humans can use real Latin to communicate amongst ourselves in secret.

Altering the colors of Mexico's flag is an actual crime.

@redeemed_zoomer Wich is the place of WELS, AALC, RCA, and CRC?

@Valent_FJ In America, the 7 sisters mainly LCMS and SBC are sorta mainline in a sense as well

This is ridiculous, and RCs/EOs are right to clown on us for this. A new Presbyterian denomination with THREE churches just Seceded from the ARP and here they justify it by the "Seceder" heritage of the ARP MAINLINE Protestantism is the only way folks

I like the LCMS.

Not everyday you get to serve with your godson!!!

Ladies and gentlemen, she said yes.

@ElijahForCA Let the reader understand that Anglicanism is the English expression of Orthodoxy, the English expression of Catholicism, and the English expression of Presbyterianism.

@PalmyrPar As an evangelical, I can tell you this: I’m glad you’re hungry for God. Just make sure that, amid all this beauty, you continue to listen directly to His voice, because that is the inheritance He died to give you. If you find Christ more clearly in Orthodoxy, praise be to God!

I’m converting to Orthodoxy Don’t ask why

This apologetics culture is just sad

More importantly, forced celibacy runs counter to the biblical theology of ministry, and this is evident to anyone who reads the Bible honestly.

Dr. John Calvin was right when he said that the human heart is an unstoppable factory of idols. Are people now worshiping worship songs instead of the One they should be worshiping - God?

Girl who’s only learned hymnody from instagram reels

@JoseNuezpa12253 @Heidel_bro1563 @calvingelical Both are Reformed, but from different biomes. 😂

To my Reformed Brothers in Christ, What's the difference between a Dutch Reformed and a Presbyterian? @Heidel_bro1563 @calvingelical

Para Roma, Dios actúa a través de personas como causas segundas libres. El ejemplo más claro es la teología de las Órdenes Sagradas, que concibe a Cristo administrando los sacramentos mediante un ministro.

Para la dogmática católico-romana, primariamente a través de causas segundas (es decir, a través del orden natural y de la libertad humana) sin suprimirlas ni sustituirlas, pero conservándolas, moviéndolas y dirigiéndolas hacia sus fines (Providencia). Consulta CIC §301-308.

He procurado limitar mis referencias a intervenciones divinas pos tiempos bíblicos. La Biblia, en la hermenéutica romana, está orientada en su totalidad a un acto de intervención divina: la Encarnación, muerte y Resurrección de Dios el Hijo.

La oración de petición, obviamente, presupone que Dios puede actuar (y lo hace). Véase CIC §2734-2745.

Esto es falso. La intervención de Dios en la historia es un dogma, no solo para el magisterio de la Iglesia Católica Romana, sino para todas las confesiones cristianas nicenas. Es una de las enseñanzas elementales de la teología cristiana.