Novo 20

What do they have on #ChristopherNolan to force him into this? What did he do?

From your sermon, @johnlovell275, I'm a little confused. Are Catholics "an ally" or "an enemy?" And in another video, you say that anyone who does not support the State of Israel is an "enemy of God." Are they "Satanic Double Agents" in the church? youtu.be/73IDtmNrcgA?si…

The Evangelical MAGA cult broke the conservative movement in America.

@natbrunell @imelizabethlane Tell me you can't exegete, without telling me you can't exegete.

@imelizabethlane Matthew 7:1–2 “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” 🧡 James 4:11–12 “Brothers and sisters, do not slander one another… Who are you to judge your neighbor?”

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is. I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath. What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain: That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her. Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.) Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance. Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity. Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure. Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power. What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker. Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride. What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time. In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks! It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely! Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing. Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came. What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion. This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

@mcscarney @Templarpilled "Blame someone older." "Don't disrespect your elders."

@Templarpilled You Boomer haters never do the math. Boomers had no choice. They had the rug pulled out from under them. Blame someone older.

To whom it may concern, if you are invited to #CatherineOhara s funeral, please sing "Danny Boy." I could think of no better tribute. There wouldn't be a dry eye in the place #SchittsCreek

.@BetterBodyFoods , I have preferred your chia seeds to other brands because they were the cleanest, until about a year ago. I don't know what happened but every batch I buy has sticks, DIRT, and other weird seeds in it. Please go back to the separation method you used before.

@BillArnoldTeach Doesn't make the movement less Satanic. You can trace your great-meemaw to a first century church goer and it won't change the fact that you have goddess worship and that you have to work for your salvation. By all means though. Claim the longest lost "Christian" movement.

History creates a problem Protestantism never solved. Most people never notice it.

@mariano93032952 @trad_west_ Believe me I get it. I often pray for the destruction of the goddess worship, idolatry, and spiritual darkness of the Catholic church.

@divichereshi @trad_west_ Still don't get it? Read Ephesians 6:10-18 where Paul describes the "Armor of God," a spiritual metaphor for the protection and strength believers need for SPIRITUAL WARFARE against evil. It's spiritual, and very real.

Real

@mariano93032952 @trad_west_ I think you are missing my point. This man does not wield a physical sword. Christians don't get to wage physical war. Matthew 26:52

@divichereshi @trad_west_ Just for the record, I saw a street preacher in the Netherlands slapped and kicked. My family and "friends" ridicules me the same way, calling me a fanatic and makinf fun of me. But I remember Joshua 1:9 and keep going. Don't you see?

@mariano93032952 @trad_west_ How do Christians conquer?

@divichereshi @trad_west_ Paul uses specific cases but states a general principle: Scripture was written for our instruction (Rom 15:4; 1 Cor 10:11). Ephesians 6 clarifies the battle is spiritual , it doesn’t erase biblical battle imagery. If you can’t see it by now, that’s fine. It’s not for everyone.

@mariano93032952 @trad_west_ And by the above verses I'm referring to Deuteronomy and Joshua.

@mariano93032952 @trad_west_ 1 Cor. Is about idolatry, Romans 15 is about endurance and living in harmony with one another. I still don't see how the above verses apply to your situation? Ephesians 6:12 is the verse most people seem to ignore. No true Christian should have taken part in the crusades.

@mariano93032952 @trad_west_ Context matters buddy. You're not David. You're not Goliath you aren't Israel under the leadership of Joshua. You aren't Solomon or Judah.

@trad_west_ Me reading the Bible:

@trad_west_ For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. Ephesians 6:12

@gotrice2024 Mom's inability to explain what the "it" was, is in itself an explanation as to why this young woman is so financially illiterate.

Whole I think it’s a good idea to allow your child to have a credit card to show responsibility while building credit. This young lady doesn’t get the concept, she thinks money is limitless and once she buys something with the card, that she has in fact paid for it. She doesn’t realize that she has to pay the money back, if you were her parent would you try harder to teach her so she understands better or is it time to call it quits and take her card back?

@BillArnoldTeach Tell me you can't exegete, without telling me you can't exegete.

𝗜𝗳 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗻𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝘀𝘁, 𝗝𝗲𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮 𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵 𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀. Every warning in Scripture is written to Christians. Not pagans. Not atheists. Believers. Branches are cut off. Names are blotted out. Faith can die. “Once saved always saved” is not biblical confidence. It is selective reading dressed as comfort. Grace saves. But Scripture is clear: you must remain. ✝️🔥

@Saffron_Sniper1 Did Daddy speak up on the miniskirt?

A 15-year-old girl was delivering a speech when a man shouted, “You can marry me” Her father immediately stepped in and handled the situation💀 A perfect example of how a dad should protect his children in today’s world 🔥

@financedystop Sooooo, Tarantino, Nolan, the Cohen brothers...

@elonmusk Mkay, that was not Trump's reasoning to go in. Trump spoke about opposing regime changes. Conservatives used to be... conservative.

Well said