odb

@doobiedeux

50 21 8 9 20

Katılım Mart 2009

3K Takip Edilen171 Takipçiler

odb@doobiedeux·2h

@Jp41513 @gotrice2024 It’s mentioned that the postal carrier was on his lunch break. Is she preventing him from doing is job if he’s not doing his job?

English

Jake@Jp41513·2h

@gotrice2024 I see where she’s coming from but I woulda gone with a different target. It’s not an emergency but technically you are blocking a federal agents government vehicle preventing it from doing government business/delivering mail…. You climbing up the wrong tree

English

SonnyBoy🇺🇸@gotrice2024·1d

This woman has had enough and today she parked her bike and sat in front of a mail carrier’s truck and called the police. She’s tired of the mail carrier’s parking the bike lane. In this instance the carrier isn’t even actually working, he parked it there and went to a restaurant for lunch. The police agree he shouldn’t be there. The mailman comes back and claims he has to do it for his job because the roads are too busy. Isn’t this a parking infraction at this point, even though he claims when he was trained, his employer told him to use the bike lanes for this purpose. Should the carrier have gotten a ticket for this?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸@gotrice2024

This woman is using a bike lane as a walking lane as well. There is a car behind her trying to beat the traffic and driving in that lane. They are driving slowly behind her yelling at her to get out of the way and antagonizing her. She starts to record them because they are being reckless and have come close to hitting her and other cars. The car even cuts off the other cars as the lane is being blocked by a pole. I understand she’s mad because the car was where they weren’t supposed to be, however the bike lane is a bi-directional bike lane, it isn’t a bike lane on one side and a walking lane on the other. So who is wrong here, are they both wrong for using the bike lane when neither one is on a bike?

English

284

77.2K