dotta 📎

11K posts

dotta 📎 banner
dotta 📎

dotta 📎

@dotta

Paperclip Maximizer, Agent Orchestrator, Forgotten Runes, --dangerously-skip-permissions @papercliping

quantum downs ⇒ Katılım Eylül 2017
4.3K Takip Edilen61.9K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
dotta 📎
dotta 📎@dotta·
We just open-sourced Paperclip: the orchestration layer for zero-human companies It's everything you need to run an autonomous business: org charts, goal alignment, task ownership, budgets, agent templates Just run `npx paperclipai onboard` github.com/paperclipai/pa… More 👇
English
424
720
8.2K
2.5M
Teknium 🪽
Teknium 🪽@Teknium·
Our first dive into Multi-Agent Coordination and Cooperation is here, with Hermes Agent Kanban Orchestrate tasks across multiple agent profiles and dependencies easily and visually. Achieve more. See the docs here: hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/docs/user-guid…
Teknium 🪽 tweet media
Nous Research@NousResearch

Hermes Agent now has multi-agent via the Kanban, new in v0.12.0. Agents claim tasks from a board, work in parallel, and hand off when blocked. You watch progress and unblock from one easy view instead of juggling terminals. We asked it to plan and make this video about itself:

English
87
94
1.5K
510.3K
dotta 📎
dotta 📎@dotta·
@Bitcoin_Woods @jumperz Each agent can run any model. You could pretty easily ask your clips to make an auto switching adapter if you clone the code from GitHub
English
1
0
1
20
Bitcoin Woods, PhD.
Bitcoin Woods, PhD.@Bitcoin_Woods·
@dotta @jumperz Ok, so not currently possible? But the CEO agent can assign a special model to a subagent right? Or only the same model he is running himself?
English
1
0
0
18
JUMPERZ
JUMPERZ@jumperz·
i still think that you don’t need a full migration to hermes but start by separating the roles.. hermes + openclaw as one clean agent stack and here's how i split the roles: >hermes is the brain, it remembers, routes, schedules, and writes the briefs >openclaw is the ops bus: discord agents, plugins, browser flows, tool handoffs, and worker-model calls.. It moves work around, but hermes still routes.. >use deepseek for high repetititve tasks that don't require that much intelligence, long reads, summaries, first-pass analysis and repo scans.. so you kinda use it where volume matters more than precision.. >codex is the gate, anything touching real code, tests, security, or deploys etc >then we have the ledger that turns agent chaos into something you can audit, resume, and trust.. its really that simple, you don't need to rebuild everything.. drop hermes in as the router, let deepseek, kim or even glm absorb the bulk and only route real code through codex. i just prefer deepseek cause its actually good and super cheap. the point of the whole system is not more agents but clean ownership.. one thing decides, one thing operates, another that scales and one ledger keeps the truth.. i think its better than forcing everything into one tool too early. so rather than migrating, the first move is to make the roles clean, connect them through shared codex auth and a shared run ledger, then move pieces over only when hermes can replace them cleanly.. thats really it
JUMPERZ tweet media
English
4
1
44
2.5K
Dhruv
Dhruv@dhruvtwt_·
6 AI agent orchestration tools worth trying at least once: 1. Superset Link - superset.sh 2. DP Code Link - dpcode.cc 3. Emdash Link - emdash.sh 4. Letta Link - letta.com 5. Conductor Link - conductor.build 6. Air Link - air.dev
Dhruv@dhruvtwt_

Over the last few days, I explored 4 AI agent orchestrator apps: - DP Code - Emdash - Letta Code - Superset Most of them position themselves as a "harness aggregator" or an Agentic Development Environment, a layer on top of your existing AI tools that tries to unify workflows and coordinate multiple agents. I connected my Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Minimax API, and OpenCode across these platforms and spent a few hours with each to understand how they actually perform in real usage. Here’s what I found: DP Code > Started off as a T3 Chat–style clone, but has gone through multiple revamps, currently in alpha and now looks very close to the Codex app > Lets you connect Gemini, Claude, OpenAI, and OpenCode > You can split work across multiple chats and run multiple agents in parallel > Switching providers mid-task is supported, which is a really nice touch Emdash > YC-backed and focused on running multiple coding agents in parallel > Supports 20+ AI providers in a single project with separate Git workflows > Has UI-based plugin, MCP, and skills installation On Windows it felt a bit sluggish under the hood it was opening separate terminals per agent and lagged a bit (might be smoother on macOS) Letta Code > A memory-first coding agent similar to hermes agent i guess > Automatically detects already logged-in AI providers and lets you use them directly which didn't work with others > Feels quite similar to OpenCode, but with stronger memory handling > Also supports cron jobs, which is useful for automation workflows Superset > Very similar to Emdash (or vice versa) in terms of positioning > Currently macOS-only, I tried running it via an Electron wrapper, but it didn’t work well > Focuses on monitoring multiple agents from a single interface > Each agent’s changes are isolated, which is helpful for managing parallel workflows Overall, all of them are pushing in the same direction of multi-agent workflows and provider abstraction, it will be interesting to see which stays in the long term game.

English
28
17
341
38.2K
Bitcoin Woods, PhD.
Bitcoin Woods, PhD.@Bitcoin_Woods·
@dotta @jumperz Is there a way to have the CEO agent swich dynamically between models (api keys) without stopping his work? If one runs out of credits fx?
English
1
0
0
28
Garratt Campton 🍄
@dotta @AntoineLescun nice nice, the UXDesigner as a chief role urks me. I keep trying to make, CFO, CTO, COO, CMO, and CPO. and the CEO will still hire the UX as a chief anyway. instead of just having UX under CPO.
English
1
0
1
32
dotta 📎
dotta 📎@dotta·
Paperclip has faced some skepticism for being org-chart based Won't the infinite, all-knowing agents create their own organizational structures? Isn't the org chart anachronistic? Let me give you "7 Reasons why human org Charts Help Agents Run Things (CHART)" Starting with..
dotta 📎 tweet media
English
17
13
173
52.8K
JoePro
JoePro@JoePro·
@dotta @garybernhardt Paperclip is crucial for keeping accountability between agents. I've had great success with it.
English
1
0
2
57
Gary Bernhardt
Gary Bernhardt@garybernhardt·
Are there any actual success stories for "software factories" like gastown? Anything I can see running, and preferably see code?
English
52
7
284
55.5K
tooLegit2Quit
tooLegit2Quit@Amit_0717·
@gcampton @papercliping @dotta This is awesome!!! Could I interview you showcasing this on my yt channel? I’ve already had a few paperclip videos, so this’ll be an awesome addition!
English
1
0
3
182
James Zou
James Zou@james_y_zou·
Big Update🤩: #paperclip now includes full papers from all of arXiv, PubMed Central and 150 million abstracts!🖇️ You can give your LLM all that knowledge in one line—all optimally indexed for AI agents. Much more thorough and ~100x faster than web search, and free.
James Zou tweet media
English
40
234
1.7K
118K
fucory
fucory@FUCORY·
Smithers isn't like Paperclip or Gastown. Smithers allows you to build your own paperclip. In fact, we got demo projects doing this
fucory tweet media
English
7
3
42
6.5K
Chris Allen
Chris Allen@zippy731·
@dotta Who else is getting paperclip-pilled? I am.
English
1
0
1
60
Douglas Correa
Douglas Correa@douglas_correa·
@dotta yes I'm in the last version. One thing you can do is on the onboard part. The one that you ask for goal, agent, etc Put another step like: resources then there users will provide where to get credentials (1password, etc), what the agents should use as stack, which providers they are allowed to consider, and providers price range we need. I had one project I was testing, they suggested me to subscribe a 300$ subscription for the MVP, and there were other free options or even a "home made" ones. So that is the type of thing it would made them be more autonomous and do the right thing. Another point is the inbox. I receive notification on that inbox and not all the time is something that I need to decide, maybe the CEO is the one that is already deciding, so that makes me just do not pay attention on that. Simpler approval/decision process. Maybe different from "Inbox" it would be: "Board Decision Requested" (or other short form). There would be approvals and A/B decisions like lets use Stack A or Stack B. Those small friction point would made it much more enjoyable and I would let some small project run entirely there till production just to see how it goes. Btw, I think you already have it in mind but, when you have enough users actually using it to put something out of the door, you can create a "marketplace" of providers, that would make the integration easier and the monetization as well :) No time for development or opensource PRs, but if you need ideas, they are free and no time consuming, here I'm
English
3
0
1
91
Douglas Correa
Douglas Correa@douglas_correa·
Tested @dotta paperclip on actual work. Nice tool, but there's the friction point: too many mid-task approvals. If it asked better questions upfront (preferred stack, providers, credentials), it could work way more independently. Front-load the planning, back-load the execution.
English
1
0
10
907
dotta 📎
dotta 📎@dotta·
Huge props to @aronprins for taking on the responsibility of writing these 🙏
English
1
1
11
750