Pumpernickel Bread

@rennaisanceman0 @slvt4doja I feel like you're moving the goalpost. I was talking about actual health and not the perception of positive ppl. Yes. There is very much a stigma around being positive. Having a "fear of AIDS" instead of educating yourself on how to stay safe further perpetuates that.

@drinkablebleach @slvt4doja Then u should know people don’t want it because of how positive people are treated and the fear mongering that causes fear of having it. Instead you’re calling people stupid and being insulting rather than educating them.

Fear of aids

@fortune71604395 @slvt4doja I'm mad that so many people within our community are so resistant when it comes to learning unbiased information on sexual health. You don't have to be a hoe to catch or spread something.

@drinkablebleach @slvt4doja Ur so mad and for what? 😂 if this what being a hoe does to your personality I don’t want it

@rennaisanceman0 @slvt4doja No. I have an education.

@drinkablebleach @slvt4doja U got that shit huh

@justin_al3x Well... This is the behavior we've all had a hand in creating. Don't act shocked when ppl are "being mean to hot gays for no reason", when these are the same TYPE of men who've evaded accountability, given opportunities, and are held as the physical standard within our community

a lot of casual cruelty towards 6 of the guys in this photo for absolutely no reason. that stinks!

@wogariginie @slvt4doja No such thing as "safe" sex. Just safer sex. All sex comes with risk. By being informed, you are understand the risk, symptoms, treatment, and prevent spreading.

@drinkablebleach @slvt4doja Like?? If youre scared or STDs/STIs is because youre not practising safe sex. Why be scared of somethingso easily preventable

@4RIESV3NUS No to defend a yt woman, but... Bringing up that she's white as some type of leverage when you're clearly in the wrong just feels manipulative. That white woman is doing her job.

omg u ppl cant do anything

This type is stupidity perpetuates homophobia.

@dayglowj0e "there are diverse queer films being released all the time..." Okay, so tell us.

gay rights & representation normalised historically very recently and ppl are all over twitter whining that there are too many films about white gays. meanwhile there are diverse queer films being released all the time which these dumbasses don’t bother watching. fuck off

The left is filled with white supremacist as well. 💁🏾‍♀️

@dayglowj0e @ygklfc Didn't even say the name of the film. Maybe YOU shouod try amplifying these films you say ppl are ignoring.

@ygklfc but there is representation. these people will amplify examples they hate for an excuse to moan online and ignore examples they would like and then they wonder why those films don’t get as much attention. i went to see a japanese queer film this week and it was nearly empty

Because without her intelligence, she can finally enjoy twitter.

Listen I already like him, you don’t have to keep selling me

@Sheeda_Auld_1 NO! I give queens with less popularity an opportunity.

If this is true, then please make the season into a "legends" format and cast the queens we all see as legends - add Detox, Pangina, Naomi, Bosco, Mistress, etc....no long shots only legends.

@afroanalytic I need context

Imagine you’re a white bathhouse bbc chaser and you see the random black guy who pounded you talking on a fucking black studies podcast 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

Part of feminism is admitting that you’re a bird about certain shit and working to unlearn it. All of us got a lil chirpy chirp you just gotta rage against the birdness

@AdamantxYves Bob, yes. Naomi, sure. But definitely not Latrice.

I don't think one single queen can carry the legacy, but a duo/trio could. They'd need to be a large presence physically/figuratively, amplify each other's strengths, and cover each other's weaknesses. IMO, that's some combo of Bob the Drag Queen, Latrice Royale, & Naomi Smalls.

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts. So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world. What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable. Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations. The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead. Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described. The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding. The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months. Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight. Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now. She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

@fairyvilles @mikeysvision Don't worry. Already did.

@drinkablebleach @mikeysvision call me anti gay then!

…just don’t hookup????? LMAOOOOO yall act like it’s impossible not to have sex