Katherine Duggan, PhD

@El_GioRamos Im impressed to see this online from them so quickly, amidst all the … stuff. And relieved to see there will be ways to keep doing this type of scholarship through NIH.

Important info about what NIH considers health disparities. This statement was just published on March 13th. nimhd.nih.gov/about/overview…

Defunding the world’s leading scientific community is akin to a performing a prefrontal lobotomy on the nation—you are effectively severing the connections between the most innovative ideas and its citizens. Everyone deserves to benefit from science and society is stronger for it. We explain why cutting support for science harms everyone!

@NNJohnsonEdD @DrMeenaKhatwa @routledgebooks @Google @googlescholar_ Just learned about your work via this comment and I'm so glad I did! Just saved a bunch of your papers. Will add some to my lab's list of prof dev articles, too!

@DrMeenaKhatwa @routledgebooks Meena, I am very interested in this, and I look forward to connecting with you! Please see my @Google @googlescholar_ page for reference (& TTY again soon): scholar.google.com/citations?user…

Call for abstracts for new @routledgebooks publication! Qualitative researchers often seek out lived experiences to answer research questions and shape narratives. But what about our own – as women, and as researchers? To submit or find out more, email: m.khatwa@ucl.ac.uk.

My RA just now: "It's like reading student papers - they're going for something, you just don't know what" 💀

@JFeltPhD @AmericanAir @PeteButtigieg I know after some point it seemed the credits have to be used within a year, but I would think your credit expiration would be based on the date you were first emailed, not a policy that went into effect later :/

@drkatnaps @AmericanAir @PeteButtigieg That’s what I thought, but they claim their computer systems won’t allow them to do so…somehow

In case anyone is wondering, @AmericanAir has elected to keep my $809.20 (from two different flights) despite an email from them assuring my ticket value was safe and could be rebooked when I was ready (no deadline specified, same email both flights). Any advice @PeteButtigieg ?

@jayvanbavel Arguably better than the whole feelings integers debacle

The result of 30 years of research and debate in psychology:

For anyone who might be interested in applying to PhD programs in quant methods this year, nearly all of the faculty in the Arizona State quant psyc program will be reviewing applications! More info on the program: #admission" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">psychology.asu.edu/degree/graduat…

@GabriellePfund I've had journals INSERT TYPOS into proofs... including IN TABLES Just, how?! What?!!?! Something like that should never even happen!!!!!

Cold-emailing potential postdoc advisors is a hugely successful strategy! Here is the exact e-mail I sent back in the day (& it worked) - feel free to use as a template: docs.google.com/document/d/1Ob…

Finally! Yet another thing we can all agree on! 👏👏👏 Can we address robo/spam calls next?!

We're hiring! Assistant/associate, open HDFS area, & using 1 or more advanced quant methods, e.g., SEM, mixed effects/MLM, & their extensions, approaches applicable to prevention/intervention, &/or other types of longitudinal &/or dyadic modeling. LMK if you have questions!

@macauleylab I am liking the registered reports concept and am starting to push my lab to do those, but again, you are still beholden to the semi-random grouping of reviewers for the peer review of the stage 1 intro + methods...

@macauleylab Seriously, you'd think we would all come up with a better system by now... I think the process where reviews are open/public is a start, but really all it does it put the poor inter-rater reliability in a public sphere. It doesn't solve the underlying problem.

@KellyannNavarre @SMasonGarrison @AAUliaszek @DrSkyeFitz This sounds so fascinating! Please add my email to the list of people you should send the article to as soon as you approve proofs!

1) SO HAPPY to share that my first first-author manuscript has been accepted! 🎉 I can't wait to share it! HUGE thanks to @SMasonGarrison, @AAUliaszek, and @DrSkyeFitz for their support through this process. I truly can’t thank them enough! 🥹 #DisabledInSTEM #BPDChat

Romantic films are a beloved staple of popular culture, but they also present a unique opportunity to explore and understand close relationships. @PaulEastwick and @EliJFinkel seize this opportunity with their new podcast, Love Factually. Learn more: ow.ly/sr6U50TEfaL

Dear friends who write NSF GRFP rec letters, this year rec letters are due BEFORE the applications, so about 10 days earlier than normal on Oct. 11. Please don't let NSF's deadline change on rec letters screw over the applicants in your lives.

@sTeamTraen Reasonable, but people should be reporting full descriptives and correlation tables even if the data are open access. It's so important from a meta-scientific perspective.

Just submitted this review. Is my request reasonable? The paper consists mostly of hierarchical regression analysis, with a surprisingly large coefficient for one IV. (There were several other questions, all of which I answered in the same way as points 2 and 3 here.)

@GhawinRiver @TheMorgenroth I am similar to @GhawinRiver. It's less about total hours towards rsch and more about making sure they have life-work balance, are healthy/happy, and are developing as a scholar. I don't push students to devote more time to rsch if it's at the expense of their health/sanity.