ThinkinCrypto
220 posts

ThinkinCrypto
@duk1ng
pentester && vul research && crypto
Katılım Ocak 2011
987 Takip Edilen88 Takipçiler
ThinkinCrypto retweetledi

#BTC #牛市
深度投研 | 别被美元障眼法骗了!三大铁证揭开比特币底牌,2026终极抄底策略指南
其实,我和独角兽大哥@UnicornBitcoin ,观点总体保持一致,只是底部区间点位有一些差异!
以下是我自己的分析研究论点!
如果你只盯着手机屏幕上的“BTC/USD”价格走势,你确实会被美元超发带来的“通胀幻觉”所欺骗。
今天,我们将剥离表象,通过底层宏观逻辑、核心链上数据与矿工行为,为您还原当前加密市场的真实底牌。
结论先行:我们目前绝非处于熊市初期,
而是正身处漫长去杠杆周期的尾声——那个充满血腥味,但也孕育着史诗级赔率的“历史大底区间”。
核心论点一:换把尺子量世界——被掩盖的14个月真实熊市周期
为什么很多人觉得熊市才刚开始?因为他们潜意识里认为,比特币在2025年10月才刚刚创下美元计价的历史新高。
从高点跌下来不过短短几个月,怎么可能是底?
这种认知的致命盲点在于计价本位。在过去的一年多里,美元体系在通胀背景下经历了物价的全面抬升,导致不仅是比特币,黄金、白银等硬资产都在同步飙升。
2025年10月的新高,很大程度上是法币贬值带来的“流动性抬价”,而非比特币真实资产购买力的内生增长。
如果我们剔除美元贬值的噪音,用终极硬通货“黄金”作为锚定物,你会发现一个令人震惊的事实:
比特币相对黄金的真实价值,早在2024年12月就已经见顶!
从那时起至今,价格结构已经走出了一个完整的14个月衰退模型。
回顾历史,比特币经历了三轮大级别的宏观回撤(2013-2015、2017-2019、2021-2022),全部都是14个月左右。
在时间维度上,当前的下跌已经走完了典型熊市的全部长度;在动量维度上,RSI 已经被死死压在了历史极低区间。
此时盲目看空,本质上是在押注历史铁律的“第一次失效”,这在概率学上极不划算。
核心论点二:链上视角的终极审判——带血的筹码与5.5万“铁底”
宏观周期给出了时间维度的答案,链上数据则精确标定了价格的空间底线。
在真正的熊市底部,一定会伴随着“长期持有者(LTH)”的绝望投降。
根据最新的链上数据,我们正在见证这一残酷的过程,但距离彻底的“清洗”可能还差最后一次脉冲式的恐慌。
衡量全网盈亏状态的核心指标 MVRV Z-Score 目前已经暴跌至标志性的“深度投降”区间,这意味着全网绝大多数的流通筹码都处于亏损水下。
短期持有者的心理防线已被击穿,而一直稳如泰山的长期持有者也开始在盈亏平衡点附近痛苦地派发筹码。
更关键的是,我们需要盯紧那个真正的宏观支撑位——已实现价格)。
这代表了全网所有比特币最后一次移动时的平均成本。目前,这个“真实市场均价”的防线落在 5.5万美元 附近。
历史上的历次大底,比特币都会去贴近甚至短暂插针刺穿这个位置,以爆掉最后的杠杆。
目前 6.4 万美元左右的价格,距离这个终极铁底的空间已经非常有限。
核心论点三:利空出尽的号角——矿工投降与投机热潮的熄火
如果说链上数据是筹码的博弈,那么矿工的生存状态和生态系统的表现,就是这个行业的“基本面体检报告”。
从 12.6 万美元跌至 6 万多美元,腰斩的币价直接摧毁了高能耗矿工的生存逻辑。目前全网算力已经锐减约 15%。
代表短期与长期算力博弈的 Hash Ribbons 指标,在过去两个月里一直死死咬合在“投降”区间。
大量中小矿工被迫变卖囤积的 BTC 来支付电费。
然而,当这些最底层的强制抛压也被市场无情消化,当低效算力被彻底清洗出局时,往往就是历史大底确立的时刻。
与此同时,看看现在的以太坊(ETH)生态。价格跌破 2000 美元大关,近期开发者大会上再也听不到关于暴富、MEME 或是狂热空投的喧嚣,所有人都在沉默地熬冬。没有这种深度的绝望,就不可能迎来下一轮真正的牛市。
交易执行:2026年“钻石手”左侧定投抄底策略
综上所述,逻辑已经非常清晰:时间周期已到、动量指标处于极值、投机泡沫挤干、矿工抛压面临枯竭。
现在绝非割肉离场之时,而是聪明资金开始贪婪的时刻。
但这并不意味着你应该在今天一把“梭哈”。
底部是一个区间,在这个区间内,市场极有可能会通过宽幅震荡和恶意的向下“插针”来折磨多头的耐心,甚至故意制造跌破前低的假象来获取流动性。
因此,我们需要制定严格的金字塔式分批建仓策略。
第一阶梯:建立底仓(资金占比 30%)
• 执行区间: 现价 64,000 美元 - 67,000 美元区域。
• 逻辑: 宏观赔率已经显现,为了防止历史规律重演导致价格直接反转、遗憾踏空,必须在这个位置拿住基础筹码。
在这个位置买入,属于输时间不输空间的极低风险博弈。
第二阶梯:心理关口加码(资金占比 30%)
• 执行区间: 59,000 美元 - 61,000 美元区域。
• 逻辑: 跌破 6 万整数关口一定会引发极大的恐慌盘和媒体的负面渲染。这部分筹码专为吃掉散户的止损盘和恐慌抛售而准备。
第三阶梯:接住终极血刃(资金占比 40%)
• 执行区间: 53,000 美元 - 56,000 美元区域。
• 逻辑: 这是预留给“黑天鹅”或者主力终极洗盘的子弹。




UNICORN⚡️🦄@UnicornBitcoin
这是比特币/黄金走势图 目前RSI处于历史最低水平 比特币相对于黄金在2024年12月见顶 之后已经回落14个月 历史三轮大级别回撤 全部是14个月左右 2013.11 到 2015.1 2017.12 到 2019.2 2021.4 到 2022.6 节奏几乎一模一样 现在很多人说熊市才刚开始 因为2025年10月美元价格创新高 问题在于 那次新高是美元体系通胀背景下的价格抬升 黄金白银同步飙升 BTC只是跟着流动性抬价 如果用黄金做锚 趋势早就转弱 RSI压到历史最低区间 价格结构走的是完整14个月衰退模型 逻辑很简单 1/ 时间维度已经走完典型熊市长度 2/ 动量指标进入历史极值 3/ 情绪面却还在押注继续破位 市场从来不奖励情绪一致的方向 当前真正的分歧点只有一个 这是熊市的后段 还是结构性失效的起点 如果历史继续有效 赔率站在反向 如果历史失效 那将是第一次完整打破三轮周期统计 现在看空的筹码 本质是在押历史第一次失效 的确有这个可能性 但概率并不大
中文

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts:
* L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected
* L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026
Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path.
First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum.
This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead.
We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs.
What would I do today if I were an L2?
* Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features
* Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets
* Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?)
From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug.
The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately).
This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add.
This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.
English

@ionet @blockchainrptr When will open-source large models be supported?
English

Forget “cloud first”. It's now the DePIN-first era.
@blockchainrptr recognized @ionet as one of 6 projects transforming physical infrastructure in 2026 by helping to make GPUs more affordable and accessible for devs worldwide.
Blockchain Reporter@blockchainrptr
Explore six DePIN projects shaping physical infrastructure in 2026, from AI compute and storage to energy grids, connectivity, and real-world revenue. blockchainreporter.net/top-6-depin-pr…
English
ThinkinCrypto retweetledi
ThinkinCrypto retweetledi

@momoGZ0412 个人瞎猜:喷撒的流感病毒,目的一,增加医院收入;目的二,趁机大规模收集人体DNA数据,为器官移植建立更全面的数据库
中文

中國軍機用火控雷達照射日本戰鬥機的事件,正好是向世界展示中國是個流氓軍國主義國家的機會!
日本是個嚮往和平的國家,但是中國正在想用武力改變臺灣的現狀,日本為了自保必須要做些對應!
🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵 x.com/don_mai_don_ma…
中文





















