berkut.eth

@Befree0x ты лошара я за градиент друга асати продам

2 projects 2 scams $CHIP: project by usdai 90% of tokens on 1 wallet crime pump happening again, the degens on Polymarket lost again $OPG: listed at $0.1, went up to $0.7 and fell back to $0.2 Total OGs in OpenGradient: 265 Airdrop of 2000 tokens = $400 Total AlphaOGs in OpenGradient: 20 Airdrop of 20,000 tokens = $4000 Do you think OpenGradient rewarded its community well?

@reflectmoney The thread is full of nonsense; no one in their right mind—whether a long-time user or a newcomer—is going to throw their money away on a platform that shifts the blame for its own mistakes (keeping all USDC in one place) onto its users.

Confirmation of Impact WRT Drift Protocol Incident Over 20 Solana protocols with downstream exposure to Drift were affected. Reflect was among them. How this affects Reflect Beta users USDC+ collateral was allocated to Drift as its lending venue. As a result of the exploit, USDC+ collateral deployed to Drift was impacted. The approximate value of USDC+ collateral allocated to Drift at the time of the incident was ~$1.9M. USDT+ was not affected. USDT+ operates on Reflect’s newer venue routing framework, which distributes collateral across multiple venues, and had no exposure to Drift at the time of the incident. Minting and redemptions for both USDC+ and USDT+ were paused immediately after detection of the exploit. Immediate Actions Taken The team has been in active daily contact with legal counsel, law enforcement, and the Drift team regarding the situation since the day of the incident. Beyond the immediate response, the team is conducting an extensive review of all available options with counsel. This includes monitoring developments around Drift’s own recovery and remediation process, law enforcement proceedings, and third-party recovery efforts underway across the ecosystem. We are not in a position to make specific commitments at this time, but we are taking this seriously and evaluating every avenue available to us. We expect to provide a further update within two weeks. Relaunching Reflect Reflect’s relaunch will follow the completion of a thorough, public review of all yield venues on the Solana network. This review will go beyond conventional smart contract risk and will cover vectors that are not always visible to end users, including multisig configuration changes, admin key activity, governance parameter modifications, and other operational risk factors that this exploit has shown are critical to monitor. We will not relaunch products until this process is complete and we are confident in the protections in place. Where to follow updates All official updates will be shared through @reflectmoney and @0xNIC0. Do not trust information from any other source.

@ddmdtriit yeah bro my bad can't talk rn got two big macs to flip

@earlyberkut let me guess, you put this together straight from your workstation at mcdonald’s

My crypto tier list. This is the only correct one. Change my mind.

@TAhmed93 @reflectmoney @DriftProtocol @chocoo_web3 I lost $10,000 because of this; I had no idea they’d be keeping all their USDC in Drift. Of course, I’d like to believe that all is not lost yet…

gm ct 🔆🌅 @reflectmoney seems to be the most affected by the @DriftProtocol hack. i want to ask @0xNIC0, your platform clearly stated that all funds are fully insured. also, no team in their right mind would allocate everything into a single bucket. so who is accountable here? 👀 your recent update doesn’t clearly explain what happens to users’ funds. clarity is needed. Otherwise, most of the users are ready to take legal action. 💯

@MaxWayld This is a really cool and useful service lfg

Today I'm shipping my first project! - 410 projects with a tier list and descriptions - 428 tools for work - Build your own tier list + upload your logos - AI roadmap for builders - The "Extra" tab with all projects for farm roles, ambassadors, hackathons and farm fundraising 800+ projects and services, each one reviewed by hand. maxy.tools

@MaxWayld Opened the parser during a team call. Boss saw my screen and asked for the referral link. Now the whole office is degen. HR is concerned but our Q1 PnL is immaculate.

Honestly, in this market you need every edge you can get. This is probably the most useful tool I've found this year: superparser.org P.S. don't stop scrolling until the very end. the actual message matters more than the tool👀

@stzoff 200 очков делаешь = 100% аирдроп от бейз

@earlyberkut от меня что требуется

Try to beat my record in the new game on the Base blockchain flyonbase.app

@tenprotocol is not about technology - TEN is the biggest scam and betrayal of its community in my entire crypto career. In this thread, I’ll show how my team and I worked with TEN’s co-founders for over 3 years, and how they took away all the tokens we were owed right before TGE

opensea solar chest The result was -$2564 in exchange costs, which is much better and more pleasant than in wave 1. I hope they won't disappoint with the token airdrop.

@opensea I got back about 72% of my investment. I hope it'll pay off.

Chests from Wave 2 are now unlocked. Everyone will discover a Treasure. Some will receive NFTs and tokens from our prize pool. Many will also notice an elevated starter chest, reflecting your participation across prior Waves. This is one step we're taking in evolving our program to reward more consistent and natural trading activity. OpenSea has made WETH offers on all NFT prizes where 11 or more items were purchased from a given collection. Wave 3 is now underway. Sails up ⛵

asterdex.com/en/referral/B2… 30% for you

@monolith_fund I completely agree with you! This was not normal volatility, but financial manipulation by a whale. The problem was acknowledged and corrected, so why are loyal users still being blamed for these losses?

As a delta-neutral fund, we farm funding rates across most markets, so we also had positions in the pre-market of $XPL (Plasma). Our strategy was to short $XPL on Hyperliquid with isolated margin and a liquidation level about 2.1x above the entry price of $0.6, while going long $XPL on Bybit. We had executed similar trades multiple times without any issues. On 26/08/2025, however, a manipulator bought up all available offers and pushed the price from $0.6 to $1.8 within 3–4 minutes, liquidating 85% of open interest - including our position. Even though we had additional margin available, this move was clearly not organic volatility but outright manipulation. We fully understand the risks of trading and accept responsibility for normal market fluctuations, but in this case the circumstances were extraordinary and far beyond typical volatility: both Bybit and Binance prices stayed at $0.6, and there was no time to react or add collateral. This was not simply about a whale’s action, but about the mechanics of how it was possible to force the price up on Hyperliquid while other exchanges remained stable. Hyperliquid provided no backstops or safeguards to prevent this type of manipulation, and the manipulator deliberately chose Hyperliquid to execute this “trade” instead of Binance, Bybit or any other perp dex, which implemented open interest caps to protect their users from manipulation. At the moment @HyperliquidX already announced that they will integrate external exchange prices into the mark price (the liquidation reference). During the incident, the mark price on Hyperliquid jumped to $1.8 while on other pre-market venues it stayed at $0.6. If external prices had been included from the beginning, nobody would have been liquidated, because the Hyperliquid price deviation from other exchanges would have been clear and corrected. In the past, Hyperliquid refunded users in the $JELLYJELLY incident, recognizing that system flaws had unfairly harmed traders. The same logic applies here: loyal users shouldn’t bear the cost of bad mechanics and targeted manipulation. I also want to emphasize that we have been using Hyperliquid since its TGE. We are very active and loyal users, as well as stakers on the platform. We strongly believe in Hyperliquid and have always supported it as part of the community. But if such events are ignored, it risks sending a message that regular users can be unfairly disadvantaged while whales act without consequence - a major red flag that would damage trust and negatively impact future activity. @chameleon_jeff @iliensinc @xulian_hl @HyperFND

If the mark price issue was acknowledged and fixed, why are platform users still being blamed and liquidated because of this issue? @HyperliquidX

The only message from my acquaintance for which he will receive a 7-day ban. You can draw your own conclusions about Hyperliquid

Apparently, it is necessary to choose centralized exchanges, because in the @HyperliquidX discord, expressing dissatisfaction without any insults simply results in a 24-hour ban. I still hope for some kind of official statement.