Save Palestine

BREAKING: Apple company removed Lebanese village names and logos, keeping only Israeli labels in entire Lebanon.

Israeli tanks in Beirut in 1982, before Hezbollah existed. There has always been an excuse. It was never their fault.

Apple has removed Lebanese village names in Southern Lebanon. As Israel invades, they are already setting the state to justify occupation. I’ve never seen something like this.

ALEX JONES TAKES A IQ TEST AFTER TRUMP SAID HE HAD A LOW IQ…

🇺🇸🇮🇷 TRUMP’S IRAN DILEMMA: NO CLEAN WIN IN SIGHT Trump doesn’t just want an end to the Iran conflict, he wants an ending that looks like dominance. Something he can stand in front of a camera and frame as strength, leverage, and personal triumph. The problem is that neither Iran nor Israel is offering him a version of reality that fits that script. Iran is not negotiating from a position of surrender. It has taken hits, but it has also shown it can disrupt global shipping, absorb pressure, and drag out talks without conceding the core issues Trump cares about. What Tehran wants, sanctions relief, control of Hormuz, and limits that don’t feel like capitulation, doesn't line up neatly with what Trump needs to declare victory. At the same time, Netanyahu isn't in a compromising mood. From Israel’s perspective, this is not the moment to ease up or freeze gains for the sake of diplomacy. It is a moment to press advantage, to keep Iran on the defensive, and to avoid any agreement that might look like letting Tehran off the hook. That leaves Trump in the most uncomfortable position for a leader who built his brand on control: he can't dictate the outcome to either side, which is why the peace talks failed. Yet he still needs an out. The battlefield has not delivered the kind of decisive, one-sided result that would allow Trump to impose those terms outright. Instead, it has produced something far messier, a strained ceasefire, ongoing threats to global trade routes, and a negotiation where every side believes it still has leverage left to use. Which means the only real path forward is not total victory, but something much harder to manage politically: a compromise that can be packaged as a win. He needs to be able to say that maximum pressure worked, that U.S strength reopened Hormuz, and that Iran will never build a nuke. If those elements exist, even in diluted form, they can be assembled into a story of success. But getting there requires two moves that cut against his instincts. First, he has to accept that Iran will not sign anything that looks like humiliation. Any deal will involve trade-offs, some form of economic relief, some acknowledgment of Iranian red lines, whether stated openly or buried in technical language. Second, and more delicate, he has to bring Netanyahu along. Because an Israeli push for continued escalation can unravel any diplomatic progress before it solidifies. That is the real balancing act: pushing Iran to concede just enough, while convincing Israel to hold back just enough. Then there's the issue of Lebanon - he has to get Iran to agree to the ceasefire not extending to it, or for Netanyahu to agree to abide by it. Neither looks possible at the moment, which is why everyone's waiting to see what happens next. How will he reconcile such incompatible positions? Because the last thing he wants is for the war to restart and turn into another Middle East forever war.

Footage showing the moment the child Mohammad Sheikh was hit