Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Patrick Bos
943 posts

Patrick Bos
@egpbos
eScientist @eScienceCenter / freelance (data) scientist & RSE / cosmologist / HPC, data science, C++ & Python / my tweets represent your opinion
Nederland Katılım Eylül 2008
604 Takip Edilen204 Takipçiler
Patrick Bos retweetledi

Are you using Docker Hub to store your containerized #Software? Recent attempts to change its pricing model have made it less attractive as a long-term repository.
Check our #Blog post by @egpbos to learn about some great free alternatives.
blog.esciencecenter.nl/ditching-docke…
English

@ezeijlemaker @Philip28952548 @mathijsbouman @Erwin89801679 Twee anoniempje237101301 accounts, negeren.
Nederlands

@Philip28952548 @mathijsbouman @Erwin89801679 Amerikaanse Democrats links? 😂 Jij weet echt niet waar je het over hebt.
Nederlands

@IvovanVulpen @PartijvdDieren @NWONieuws Het viel mij gisteren ook voor het eerst op. Ontworpen door golfers?
Nederlands

In navolging van de @PartijvdDieren heb ik net weer een evaluatie van een @NWONieuws commissie afgesloten met de opmerking: "Voorts ben ik van mening dat er een einde moet komen aan het scoren op een schaal van 9-1 bij onderzoeksvoorstellen". #langeadem #van1tot10
Nederlands

Nothing extremely major, but I've ported my blog over to Mkdocs-Material (with Insiders)!
Findable at koaning.io
Did a bunch of small hacks to get it to how I wanted it but it was a pleasant experience to port.
GIF
English

@vancalmthout Qoninqlijqe Nederlandse Aqademie van Uetensquappen #teamq
Nederlands

@egpbos It looks like we may both be right :) I still prefer to err on the side of caution and severely limit these types of experiments. science.org/content/articl…
English

Stop this madness. We should all shout from the rooftops, this is way more important than any EDI initiative. "While Omicron causes mild, non-fatal infection, the Omicron S-carrying virus inflicts severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%."biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
English

@shulevski It's the reference on biorxiv you mentioned. "WT and Omi-S caused mortality rates of 100% (6/6) and 80% (8/10), respectively".
English

@egpbos I would like to read that publication about the base strain. Do you have a reference to it?
English

@shulevski It has, under the same experimental conditions as those that produced the 80% number. Spraying a huge dose of the virus straight up the poor mice' noses. Result with base strain: 100% dead. Result with chimera: 80% dead.
English

@egpbos I don't think that the base strain had 100% mortality... more like 1-2%
English

@shulevski ...which is lower than the 100% mortality of the original. Sure, it's still dangerous, but this stuff is out there in the world already, actually killing people. I think we should try to understand it as well as we can so we can fight it better.
English

@egpbos The type where you splice a virus variant which has just caused a pandemic with its original strain to produce a chimera with 80% mortality (in human-analog mice). 😉
English

@flim_nl @neef_steef @bencoates1 There's also German "gewiss", which is a more direct cognate to Dutch "wis".
English

@egpbos That is interesting, but what is irresponsible and dangerous is the splicing of Omicron and the original strain in a lab with minimum public input on whether these types of research should continue.
English

@shulevski Really interesting actually!
1. Wuhan + Omicron Spike = 80% mortality
2. Wuhan = 100% mortality
3. Omicron = 0% mortality
=> Omicron, even without spike, is weaker than Wuhan
That's in line with the expectation that the virus will evolve towards a common cold / flu.
English



