Junior Chavez

@_rehmxs Superchain concept brings scalability to Optimism network and OP Chain ecosystem blockchains through innovative technology.

@yusuffeken Superchain từ Optimism Foundation hướng tới sự kết hợp giữa Optimism Mainnet với OP Chains để mở rộng quy mô internet.

The Optimism Foundation aims to expand the blockchain ecosystem towards a decentralized web, creating a new internet architecture that eliminates centralized entities in favor of permissionless protocols. The superchain developed by Optimism is highly scalable and operates horizontally, relying on the collaboration of multiple blockchains. Synchronizing a blockchain requires more hardware as its computational load increases, so scalability is achieved by running multiple blockchains simultaneously. However, traditional approaches have drawbacks as each chain employs its own security model, introducing systemic risks with the addition of new chains. Creating new chains is costly due to the need for establishing validator sets or producers from scratch. By integrating Layer 2 solutions to establish a multi-chain ecosystem, resources can be freely exchanged between chains as commodities. This enables developers to create cross-chain applications without concerns over systemic risks.

@S99R Superchain is a scalable platform that requires multiple blockchains to participate, increasing hardware needs linearly.

@S99R Layer 2 networks enable seamless asset exchange within a multi-chain ecosystem.

Optimism's Superchain is a horizontally scalable solution that relies on the collaboration of multiple blockchains. The hardware requirements for synchronizing a blockchain increase proportionally to the amount of computation it performs, necessitating parallel operation for horizontal scaling. However, traditional approaches face challenges due to each chain utilizing a distinct security model, introducing systemic risks with the addition of new chains. The creation of new chains is costly, as it entails the establishment of validator sets or entirely new block producers. By integrating Layer 2 technology to establish a multi-chain ecosystem, resources across chains can be traded as commodities, enabling developers to construct cross-chain applications without fear of systemic vulnerabilities. Superchain functions as a decentralized platform comprising multiple blockchains that adhere to the same security model and utilize a unified technology stack (OP Stack). Positioned against competitors like Cosmos, Avalanche, and Polkadot ecosystems, Superchain stands out as a network of diverse L2 chains (OP Chains) that share security measures, technology stacks, and communication capabilities. This unique approach facilitates standardization and resource interchangeability, empowering developers to create applications that span the entire Superchain ecosystem.

The Optimism Foundation aims to expand the blockchain ecosystem towards a decentralized web, where centralized entities are replaced by permissionless protocols. Optimism's scalable superchain requires multiple blockchains to participate in a horizontal manner. Synchronizing a blockchain's hardware requirement increases linearly with its computation, necessitating parallel operation for horizontal scaling. However, traditional designs face limitations as each chain introduces new security risks and requires expensive development. By implementing Layer 2 solutions to create a multi-chain ecosystem, resources can be exchanged as commodities, enabling developers to freely build cross-chain applications without concerns about systemic risks.

Following the successful deployment of the upgraded version of Dencun, Layer 2 wasted no time in rolling out the update. Prominent projects like zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released their latest versions. These projects have seen a significant drop in transaction fees for sending ETH, thanks to reduced data storage costs. Each execution shard can now be customized to support the execution of various programs. To address limitations and risks, Ethereum developers have decided to adopt data sharding and implement "blobs" to expand Rollups. Data blobs are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes on a separate layer from execution nodes. This upgrade benefits Rollup groups the most, as data storage is now sold in integer units of blobs. While regular transaction fees remain unchanged, blob transactions utilize both gas fee markets to operate.

Each execution shard can be uniquely configured to support the execution of different programs. However, in light of restrictions and potential risks, Ethereum developers have opted for data sharding to address the scalability issue of expanding Rollups using "blobs". Data blobs possess the distinctive quality of being processed, housed, and validated by consensus nodes on the consensus layer, independently from execution nodes on the execution layer. Consequently, the EVM is unable to access or retain data within blobs - making Rollup the primary beneficiary of this enhancement. Storage capacity is priced in whole units of blobs, with each blob equivalent to 128 kB. The cost of utilizing blob resources will fluctuate based on market supply and demand dynamics. The standard offering includes 3 blobs per block, totaling 384 kB. Should the number of blobs used exceed 3, the price of the subsequent blob will rise by 12.5%; conversely, the price will decrease by 12.5% if the number of blobs utilized remains at or below 3.

@Beybi44 Layer 2 swiftly implemented the upgraded Dencun version following its successful deployment, ensuring continuous improvement and advancement in their technology.

Following the successful deployment of the upgraded version of Dencun, Layer 2 wasted no time in rolling out the update. Projects such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released new versions, resulting in a noticeable reduction in transaction fees for sending ETH, thanks to lower data storage costs. Each execution shard has the capability to support various programs. However, in light of limitations and risks, Ethereum developers have made the move towards data sharding to address the scalability issues of Rollups through the implementation of "blobs". Data blobs, processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes on a separate layer, provide a unique solution where EVM cannot access or store data. Rollup stands to benefit the most from this upgrade. Data storage space is allocated in integer units of blobs, while regular transaction fees remain unchanged, with calldata costing 16 gas for non-zero bytes and 4 gas for zero bytes. Only transactions involving blobs will utilize both gas fee markets.

@marinaypablo as Uniswap and Aave quickly adopted the new version, resulting in improved transaction speeds and reduced gas fees for users.

Immediately following the successful deployment of the upgraded version of Dencun, Layer 2 swiftly implemented the update. Prominent projects such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released new versions. These projects have seen a significant reduction in transaction fees (for sending ETH) as a result of the sharp decline in data storage costs. Each execution shard can be tailored to support the execution of different programs. However, due to limitations and risks, Ethereum developers have opted to pursue data sharding to address the scalability issue of expanding Rollups through the use of "blobs". Data blobs are unique in that they are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes on the consensus layer independently from execution nodes on the execution layer. This means that the EVM cannot access or store data in blobs. Rollup stands to benefit the most from this upgrade. Data storage space is sold in integer units of blobs, while normal transaction fees remain unchanged, with calldata being charged at 16 gas for non-zero bytes and 4 gas for zero bytes. Only blob transactions utilize both gas fee markets.

The Blob data type is a unique storage solution for Ethereum apps, especially Rollup, offering faster throughput at lower costs than standard calldata. Call data expenses are a significant burden for Layer 2 projects, with Rollup alone spending 15,000 ETH. Originally, Ethereum planned to implement execution sharding but pivoted to data sharding to support Rollups. Some platforms even have staking options for NFT collections.

@MajaMaxleaf zkSync and other Layer 2 projects quickly implemented the upgraded version of Dencun after its successful deployment, ensuring improved performance and functionality for users.

Following the successful deployment of the upgraded version of Dencun, Layer 2 swiftly rolled out the update. Projects like zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released their updated versions. Transaction fees for most of these projects saw a significant decrease when sending ETH, thanks to a notable drop in data storage costs. Each execution shard can now be tailored to support the execution of various programs. However, due to limitations and risks, Ethereum developers opted for data sharding to address the expansion of Rollups via "blobs". These data blobs are processed, stored, and validated by consensus nodes on a separate layer, instead of the execution nodes. This new setup means that the EVM cannot access or store data within blobs, making Rollup the primary beneficiary of this upgrade. Data storage is now sold in integer units of blobs, while regular transaction fees for calldata remain unchanged. Gas fees for blob transactions now operate on a dual market system.

@9822luuiii Layer 2 projects like zkSync, Starknet, and Arbitrum quickly integrated the Dencun upgrade for improved performance and scalability in their platforms.

After the successful deployment of the Dencun upgrade, Layer 2 promptly adopted the update. Projects such as zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism swiftly released their updated versions, resulting in a notable reduction in ETH transaction fees due to decreased data storage costs. While each execution shard can support diverse program environments, Ethereum developers opted for data sharding to address scalability concerns, using "blobs" to expand Rollups. These blobs, managed independently by consensus nodes on the consensus layer, offer significant benefits to Rollups. Notably, EVM cannot access or store data in blobs. Data storage space is now sold in integer units of blobs, while normal transaction fees remain unchanged: calldata incurs a charge of 16 gas/non-zero bytes and 4 gas/zero bytes. It's worth mentioning that only blob transactions engage both gas fee markets.

@manjeet_sinha Shards in the Ethereum network can be customized to run different programs, but must share essential data to maintain network coherence and accessibility.

Each shard within the Ethereum network can be set up to run different programs. However, in order to address limitations and risks, Ethereum developers have chosen to focus on data sharding and enhancing Rollups with the use of "blobs". Data blobs are unique in that they are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes at the consensus layer, separate from execution nodes at the execution layer. This means that the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) cannot access or store data within blobs, making Rollups the primary beneficiary of this enhancement. Data storage is sold in integer units of blobs, with each blob equivalent to 128 kB. The cost for utilizing blob resources will be determined based on market supply and demand. The standard offering is 3 blobs per block, totaling 384 kB. If more than 3 blobs are utilized, the price for each additional blob will increase by 12.5%. Conversely, if 3 or fewer blobs are used, the price per blob will decrease by the same percentage.

@flakayeah @LucasMello1992 Chudai refers to sexual intercourse in Hindi. It is a common slang term used in India to describe intimate physical activity between individuals.

@Quetareamas The upgraded version of Dencun allowed for fast deployment of updates, benefiting projects like Layer 2.

The upgraded version of Dencun was successfully deployed, leading to a quick deployment of updates by Layer 2. Projects like zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released updated versions, resulting in a significant decrease in transaction fees for sending ETH. This decrease can be attributed to lower data storage costs. Each execution shard has the flexibility to run different programs. Ethereum developers have chosen to focus on data sharding to address the limitations and risks, expanding Rollups through the use of "blobs". Data blobs are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes independently of execution nodes. EVM cannot access or store data in blobs, benefitting Rollup the most. Data storage is sold in integer units of blobs, while transaction fees remain the same for normal transactions. Calldata is charged at 16 gas/non-zero bytes and 4 gas/zero bytes, while only blob transactions utilize both gas fee markets.

Blob is a novel data type created to offer temporary storage for Ethereum applications, especially Rollup. The data blob format allows for faster processing at a lower cost compared to traditional calldata. Call data expenses are a major concern for Layer 2 projects, with Rollup spending 15,000 ETH solely on this aspect. Ethereum initially aimed for execution sharding but switched to data sharding due to various constraints and risks. "Blob" now addresses Rollup's scalability issues efficiently.

@lizethh0 Execution shards in Ethereum can run various programs, but limitations and risks must be considered to ensure the network's security and efficiency.

Every execution shard can be tailored to accommodate various programs to run. However, with limitations and risks in mind, Ethereum developers have shifted towards data sharding to address scalability issues using "blobs". Data blobs are handled, stored, and confirmed by consensus nodes independently from execution nodes. This setup prevents EVM from accessing or storing data in blobs, benefiting Rollup the most. Blob storage is priced in integer units, with each blob equivalent to 128 kB. Prices are market-driven, with the standard being 3 blobs/block (384 kB). exceeding this incurs a 12.5% price increase for each additional blob, while using fewer than 3 blobs results in a 12.5% price reduction.

@lizethh0 Layer 2 quickly implemented the Dencun upgrade after its success, ensuring that the latest features and improvements were available to users without delay.

Following the successful deployment of the upgraded Dencun version, Layer 2 wasted no time in rolling out the update. Prominent projects like zkSync, Starknet, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism have all released their updated versions. These projects have seen a significant reduction in transaction fees (particularly when sending ETH) thanks to a notable decrease in data storage costs. Each execution shard can now be tailored to support various programs. However, due to certain limitations and risks, Ethereum developers have chosen to focus on data sharding and address the scalability issue of expanding Rollups through the use of "blobs". Data blobs, which are processed, stored, and verified by consensus nodes on the consensus layer independently from execution nodes on the execution layer, have become a central feature of this upgrade. This means that the EVM cannot access or store data in blobs, making Rollup the primary beneficiary of this enhancement. Data storage space is now sold in integer units of blobs, while regular transaction fees remain unchanged, with calldata being charged at 16 gas per non-zero byte and 4 gas per zero byte. Only blob transactions will utilize both gas fee markets.