Stephen Emberson

9.5K posts

Stephen Emberson banner
Stephen Emberson

Stephen Emberson

@embe14

Sports fan, with an opinion on everything, especially anything sports integrity related. All opinions are my own, and the correct ones! I have spoken

Katılım Haziran 2009
779 Takip Edilen756 Takipçiler
80's Wrestling
80's Wrestling@80sWrestling_·
Who was a fan of this match?
80's Wrestling tweet media
English
60
40
669
16.4K
Stephen Emberson retweetledi
Luke
Luke@lukeaaronmoore·
Or you could, as a wealthy person, just buy the cake and post it on instagram as well because, you know, you like the cake. Then you could enjoy a delicious cake for your family and help out a business at the same time
Spencer Morgan@spencermorgan93

I love it how it’s perfectly fine for businesses to message them but completely unacceptable vice versa One free cake for a post to over a million people is obviously a good deal for the cake business anyway They’ve just done this to get more exposure through press

English
2
10
474
85.4K
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@gamray The classic “it’s not racism, why you taking it like that?” replies. I always wonder how many are stupid and how may are just insincere
English
2
0
19
4.1K
Richard
Richard@gamray·
the bloke has done The Knowledge and is perfectly entitled to take a call during a job, presumably with the intercom off so not bothering poor, hard done by Alastair in the slightest. This is proper old school racism - racism for the sake of racism
Alastair Hilton@London_W4

You’ve gotta laugh I suppose. Heading home now and I thought, no, I won’t give uber my money, I’ll support a good old British London black cab. So I hailed one and here I am, with a Somali driver talking into his phone the whole journey. Reminds me of being in an uber. Apart from the price.

English
55
59
2.8K
434.3K
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@Alan_Alger_ Gateshead’s form turnaround is wild. Other than the Championship, it’s always the craziest league.
English
1
0
1
96
Stephen Emberson retweetledi
Reuters Sports
Reuters Sports@ReutersSports·
Czech police have carried out raids and detained dozens of people related to corruption and fraudulent betting on soccer matches as part of a long-term investigation, the soccer association and prosecutors said on Tuesday. reut.rs/3PVUMYE reut.rs/3PVUMYE
English
0
2
2
418
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@slbsn @j_macgeever They investigated the potential PSR breach as a by product of the investigation, as they rightly should. They didn’t breach PSR rules, so were therefore not charged with that. Standard slinging of “have you even read it”, I thought we were having a respectful convo on it
English
0
0
0
49
slbsn
slbsn@slbsn·
@embe14 @j_macgeever It is part a PSR case. It was literally a foundation of why the PL didn't push for harsher penalty. Have you even read the sanction agreement. Seemingly not.
English
1
0
0
111
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@slbsn Absolutely, and how do you think they encourage clubs to comply with that? Why would a club self report if it’s not looked upon favourably? This is why the cases are different, complying with a PSR case is like saying yeah I did, whilst staring at CCTV footage of you doing it.
English
0
0
0
26
slbsn
slbsn@slbsn·
@embe14 Self reporting is a requirement of the PL rules.
English
1
0
0
78
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@j_macgeever @slbsn I never argued for or against a sporting sanction. I think there is valid conversation. My point was, to liken it to a PSR case is a reach, given the circumstances involved. As mentioned, I think the sentence is light.
English
2
0
0
106
Jordan J MacGeever
Jordan J MacGeever@j_macgeever·
@embe14 @slbsn If the logic is well they deserve a transfer ban then it still should be in not arguing for a points deduction
English
2
0
0
33
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@slbsn One case (whether we want to argue that the evidence would have surfaced through other means aside), deals with self reporting. The other case you reference deals with a case in which the club had no choice but to comply. Not even considering the wildly varying topic.
English
1
0
0
80
slbsn
slbsn@slbsn·
@embe14 It absolutely does. And obviously so. It is a case that specifically considered the impact of admission and exceptional co-operation in the context of rule W disciplinary proceedings. It is DIRECTLY relevant.
English
1
0
0
58
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@j_macgeever @slbsn I mean, it is an exact reason for it to be lighter. It happens in many situations, including criminal court cases. Do I have I think it’s too light? Even given the mitigation? Yes I do. But it still has zero to do with the any of the PSR cases.
English
2
0
0
90
Jordan J MacGeever
Jordan J MacGeever@j_macgeever·
@embe14 @slbsn Just because Chelsea would’ve continued to get away with it and nothing would’ve happened if the didn’t bring it to light. That’s not a reason for the punisher to be lighter
English
1
0
0
29
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@j_macgeever @slbsn Because the cooperation is under completely different circumstances. As is the situation with cases, especially on completely different topics and breaches.
English
1
0
0
36
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
Very real scenario is that wealthy owners will be able to show they have sufficient resources… until they get bored.
Henry Winter@henrywinter

New licensing system for the 116 clubs in Premier League, EFL and National League requires them to hold “sufficient resources” to steer them away from any potential “cliff edge”. Level of risk will be assessed on a club-by-club basis by Independent Football Regulator. From 2027/2028 season, clubs in the top five divisions will require a licence from the IFR in order to compete. Clubs need to show liquidity to meet their financial commitments and cope with "stress" such as relegation or withdrawal of owner funding. Club liquidity will be monitored on an ongoing basis by the IFR which can also impose measures such as “reducing expenditure or restructuring debt”. (Players not counted as liquid assets as “clubs cannot readily realise their value outside transfer windows”). Clubs must also show evidence of “having meaningfully consulted" with fans. “It cannot be right that so many clubs exist on a cliff edge where one change could threaten their entire existence – fans should be debating formations not finances,” says IFR CEO Richard Monks. “Our licensing regime will ensure that club risk is managed appropriately, creating a more stable environment for growth and investment.” Four “key risk factors” that IFR expects clubs to “monitor and mitigate” are... *Business Model – funding gaps between income and costs. *Liquidity & Cash flow – the ability to meet short-term financial obligations. *Solvency and Debt – risks to operating in the medium to long term. *Governance – adequacy of financial decision-making and risk management.

English
0
0
0
146
Stephen Emberson
Stephen Emberson@embe14·
@slbsn Not at all in my view. Cooperation has, and will always be viewed differently case to case, dependent on multiple factors. Given these cases have significant differences, it’s not surprising. Sentence in light for Chelsea but still doesn’t make the Forest case relevant.
English
3
0
0
124
slbsn
slbsn@slbsn·
@embe14 Not at all. The points made on exceptional cooperation are absolutely relevant.
English
1
0
2
2.1K