equistamp

9 posts

equistamp

equistamp

@equistamp

Research operations for AI safety. We handle eval implementation, data annotation, and project ops so researchers can focus on research.

Katılım Kasım 2023
42 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
equistamp
equistamp@equistamp·
Equistamp is hosting an AI Safety Happy Hour in Austin during SXSW! 🤠 Join us next Friday, March 13th at FUTO. This will be the beginning of a larger effort to build an AI Safety community in Austin. Please retweet if you are in the area! RSVP: luma.com/vyaer9vu
English
0
0
7
2.6K
equistamp
equistamp@equistamp·
Week 2 Newsletter: Our EU Commission projects are officially launching! This week: Control evals kickoff, CBRN risk assessment begins, new team members joining our mission. Plus: We're hiring AI safety researchers & engineers. Read more & subscribe: open.substack.com/pub/equistamp/…
English
0
0
0
53
equistamp retweetledi
Martian
Martian@withmartian·
$1,000,000 to understand how LLMs write code. Announcing: The Martian Interpretability Challenge. Understanding the inner workings of LLMs is the greatest scientific challenge of our age,. Let's solve it. Apply here: withmartian.com/prize 🧵👇
Martian tweet media
English
11
45
155
32.1K
equistamp
equistamp@equistamp·
@ylecun @tom_doerr @skdh This doesn't make any sense. You're always pushing open source and now you tweet this? Also, how could you enumerate every possible thing that could go wrong with a powerful AI? Bugs always happen and software. You might be able to stop bugs at Meta, but what about elsewhere?
English
2
0
1
28
Yann LeCun
Yann LeCun@ylecun·
@tom_doerr @skdh Like every powerful tool: you only put them in the hands of people who have been properly trained, or place them under strict institutional control for the most powerful ones.
English
67
3
45
71.7K
Sabine Hossenfelder
AI becoming intelligent and AI developing its own values and being able to act on them are two different problems. The former -- intelligence -- is likely to precede the latter. I don't think it will be long and I think not enough attention is being paid to the most obvious immediate problem: Any individual, company, or government in possession of a device that vastly outperforms average human intelligence will be incredibly powerful. The potential for abuse is enormous. The human brain doesn't work with magic. It's a big wobbly thing with a lot of connections that can process a lot of information -- sometimes well, sometimes not so well. It is not an optimal device for intelligence because it's not what it evolved to be. The human brain evolved to keep us alive. This means among other things it needs to be energy efficient, which indeed it is quite good at. But artificial brains have no such limits so of course they will eventually outperform humans. If you don't understand why superior intelligence is scary, you've read too many touchy sci-fi stories in which human irrationality saves the day. But humans didn't come to dominate this planet because they're somtimes irrational, they came to dominate despite of it. x.com/rolandkuhn/sta…
Roland Kuhn@rolandkuhn

@skdh Could you elaborate on this correspondence? A nuclear bomb is a passive thing that is used by someone. An intelligence on the other hand is an active sentient being — we will not be able to just use it, at least not for long. So which one is it that you fear?

English
212
95
970
257.7K