DEI is anti-white male discrmination

Type the year you turned 18 into the GIF bar and post the best GIF you see.

Be honest because I’m proving a point When you were a child if you didn’t want to eat what your mother made for dinner What happened?

You meet your 18 year old self, you’re allowed 3 words. What do you say?

i’ve thought about this lately. there is a massive lack of incel sympathy for ugly girls due to the fact that “someone will still find them attractive”, and “they still all want chad”, as if the sub5 men also don’t also all want their own gio scotti. being genuinely ugly as a woman must be one of the most terrifying body horrors i can imagine, because unlike a man you can practically do nothing else to make yourself more desirable. men have charisma, status, money, humor, aura, style, things that can genuinely move the needle on female attraction but women almost exclusively have their looks. every good trait a woman has besides her looks only matters in the context of her looks. imagine being a sub5 foid and going to miami, you literally wouldn’t exist. you wouldn’t be perceived. women around you would be treated as royalty for just existing and you are nothing, and you can’t do anything to become anyone. as a man you should always be grateful you were born a man. you were given agency and command over your own destiny. a woman has none of those things, she can cure cancer and it would raise her value by like 5%. she is only what she is and nothing more. BRUTAL

Women do not owe the world an increase in birth rates. Every few months there’s a new headline: “Fertility crisis.” “Declining birth rates.” “Who will take care of the ageing population?” And every time, the finger points at women. Have more children. Sacrifice more. Save the economy. But let’s be clear: women are not incubators for GDP. We are not vessels for demographic policy. We are human beings with autonomy.

So many replies are “it’s not the end of the world if he gets the wrong kind of milk” and that’s why I need to re-iterate: men can avoid having these problems at all if they treat their home life as seriously as they treat their jobs. They’d never check in 10x with their boss on one simple task. They would know how things are done and not have to constantly ask. Or, they would be fired.

Everyone needs to calm down about women. We are past the "women are inferior and subordinate" stage. We are past the "all women should be a SAHM" stage. We are past the "women shouldn't vote" stage. Women aren't inferior to anyone. We are strong and capable in our own right. Women aren't trying to be men because men should not be the ideal we should strive for. We were meant for greater things. We have choices now. If a woman wants to be a SAHM mom, we support that. If she doesn't, we support that too. If she wants 10+ children, as long as it's her choice, we support it. If she wants to remain childless, she has our support. Women occupy space in this world, and we are going to continue to occupy spaces where decisions are made that involve us or affect us. Women have the right to vote and we are going to continue to vote. If you don't like the way we vote, keep in mind we aren't thrilled with the way you vote either. Maybe you are the problem. The more you attack feminism, the more we double down. We do not have rights because men allow us to. We had rights all along, men just kept them from us. Stay strong, ladies.

I’m thinking you should stay home. Stay in your house. The difficulty now is finding a full coverage suit for women. Seems like all the suits are “cheeky “. The bible specifically says if you are lustful then poke your eyes out. Do that or stay home. A bathing suit is not sex. But you are sexualizing it and teaching your kids the same.

There is no cowardice. I openly want ~all illegal aliens deported, women given protection in vagina-only spaces, crime BROKEN in cities, phonics and post-Sumerian math back in the schools, masculine fatherhood promoted, wars involving the USA quickly and ruthlessly won, fentanyl and even coke boats burning in the water, child molesters burning alive on land, Israel extant and the Jews safe as a people, the leadership of Hamas and Hezbollah dead, gun rights intact, voter fraud made largely impossible, large-boost affirmative action done with, etc. These are all majority positions, btw.

This seems like an example of people who seemed reasonable in 2020, now mirroring what they used to despise. Creating a "safe space" for men in psychology? That sounds like exactly the kinds of things woke folks wanted for say, black people or LGBT folks in 2020. Now this "affirmative action" is a good idea so long as it's for dudes? It seems the weakness in what she is saying is "assuming talent is distributed equally", but wasn't that something we were saying wasn't necessarily true? Indeed, we might expect some talents and interests to differ significantly between the sexes. I may also be lucky with my colleagues (and students) in my department, but I can't remember once thinking, "I would be a lot happier at work if only not for all the damned women." That's crazy. Just as with race, I think we have a lot more similarities than differences and what differences we have are interesting, not barriers to happiness. Now for therapy specifically, I think it would be great to have more men to get more diversity in perspective. As for women therapists, I don't think the problem is having women therapists; the problem is groups like the APA telling all therapists to treat traditional masculinity as "toxic" which is bad advice. But is it just me, or did people 6 years ago basically say that with freedom we'd expect to see some sex sorting into careers that's natural...and now it's unnatural and something we need regulation of some sort to force back to 50/50...exactly the program of the woke? Thoughts?

This will be a hard one for some men to hear: If you have ever: 1.) Had sex with someone while they were WAY more drunk than you 2.) Begged and pleaded your partner for sex until they eventually gave in, and complied 3.) Threatened to break up, or cheat unless your partner gave in, and gave you sex, and so they complied You raped someone

Maybe it's just me, but I have heard/seen the word "manosphere" (a cringeworthy term anyway) more in recent weeks than I have in all the years since it faded toward the end of the 2010s. Yes, feminists in MSM need their straw man fallacies in order to even exist, let alone create content, but it's curious why they're trying to revive this specific thing all of a sudden.