eternivity (❖,❖)

1.9K posts

eternivity (❖,❖) banner
eternivity (❖,❖)

eternivity (❖,❖)

@eternivity1

🫵

ETH Katılım Eylül 2023
924 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Zener
Zener@zenerbabax·
Yeni etkileşim tuzağı mavi tık postları.
Türkçe
36
1
91
4.5K
eternivity (❖,❖)
eternivity (❖,❖)@eternivity1·
There were two things you could have done an airdrop for: the NFT and AURA. People used the Common platform and paid a lot of fees within the platform to earn AURA. However, the amount of tokens you distributed for AURA was laughably small far less than what it should have been. People bought the NFTs at the same price, yet you gave extra tokens just because of rarity. Those who spent $500–600 buying from the market only received around 9,000 tokens since they weren’t level 5, and many of them took heavy losses. You didn’t even properly announce that screenshots were being taken. At the very least, you could have avoided vesting or at the bare minimum, allowed claiming before listing. After six months, 67% of the locked tokens will be worthless. You completely disregarded people’s efforts. You could have distributed the airdrop fairly and planned long-term benefits for the NFTs to keep the community alive. But instead, you ruined the project. I honestly think you did this on purpose because such a disastrous process can only be explained by either scamming people or pure stupidity. You no longer have a community go on your own now.
English
0
0
1
311
King
King@0xKing_7·
Dear Binance Team, Sincerely: @_RichardTeng @cz_binance @heyibinance @binance @DanaBuidl @ellazhang516 @mucahittdonmez @AllinBNB On behalf of the community, we are reporting a serious violation regarding the token distribution plan under the Common.xyz project. Summary of the issue: According to the project’s official documentation, the Common team committed to distributing a total of 39 million Common tokens (26.1%) for the Aura allocation and 26 million Common tokens (17.3%) for Historical Contributions. However, based on community observations, only 9 million Common tokens have been distributed so far. The remaining 30 million Common tokens and 26 million Historical allocation tokens have not yet been transferred to user wallets. $COMMON Why this matters: These undistributed tokens represent a significant portion of the project’s total supply. The lack of distribution raises serious concerns, including lack of transparency, potential unfair advantage, and risks of market manipulation. Such practices undermine investor confidence and contradict Binance’s “fair distribution” principles outlined in its listing policies. Community request: We respectfully ask Binance to investigate this matter and request an official statement from the Common.xyz team. If necessary, we urge Binance to temporarily suspend the TGE (Token Generation Event) process until a transparent and fair distribution plan is provided. The community does not consider it fair for the project to be traded on Binance without delivering on its promised token allocations in a transparent manner. common.foundation/blog/common-in…
King tweet media
Binance Futures@BinanceFutures

Binance Futures will launch the USDⓈ-M $COMMON perpetual contract at 🗓️Oct. 27 2025, 12:30 (UTC) Read more 👇 binance.com/en/support/ann…

English
5
0
18
1.9K
eternivity (❖,❖) retweetledi
Collab Web3 ☠️
Collab Web3 ☠️@CollabW3·
@zenerbabax @dillchen An account with 1 NFT (20 aura) received 27k aura. An account with 1 NFT (600 aura) received 28k aura. An account with 1 NFT (6300 aura) received 50k aura. @dillchen How is this calculated? I was officially scammed.
English
2
2
18
1.3K
eternivity (❖,❖) retweetledi
Tufanoglu
Tufanoglu@Tufanoglu_·
Common Airdrop Suggestions Unfair System & NFT Cliff 1-Community Value & Loyal Users The community wants to feel valued by the Common team but it seems like this system isnt fair to them They are trying to show their loyalty to the project but they feel a bit undervalued. 2-Trust, Support & Recognition Your community matters they want to feel valued and appreciated by the team just like they support and stand by you I know you care for the Community hear them out they trust you and hoping for the best They supported you with everything they could Lamumu holders are unhappy with these conditions Everyone knows how much you care for the Lamumu holders listening to them is the right choice The community walks with you on this path dont leave them behind 3-The cliff and vesting for NFTs has been disappointing With this system real users will be upset. You want to reward the real users but This system unfairly disadvantages real holders who distribute their NFTs across multiple wallets. We’ve received a lot of feedback on this situation. NFTs shouldn’t have a verification level. Most of the time, users split their NFTs between wallets this behavior is part of Web3 culture. - @dillchen , @0xmullet , @RhysFH !
Tufanoglu tweet media
English
83
40
319
13K
eternivity (❖,❖) retweetledi
Frank
Frank@cybttx·
There really shouldn’t be any vesting for NFTs. I’ve literally never seen that before, and it just doesn’t make sense. Maybe a multiplier could be fine still kinda dumb, but whatever but vesting? No way. @Commonfnd been around for years, and honestly, its best days were thanks to the Turkish community. We backed it hard, that’s where the momentum came from. So doing this to the people who actually supported the project feels super unfair. It’s not too late to change your mind , if you really care about the long-term success of the project, you should rethink this. @commondotxyz @lamumudotxyz @dillchen
Frank tweet media
English
4
3
61
2.4K
eternivity (❖,❖) retweetledi
Erenium
Erenium@ereniumcrypto·
📣Real Voice of Common ➡️Community Feedback @commondotxyz @Commonfnd 🐮As Lamumu NFT holders, we are disappointed by the airdrop process. ➡️The use of the UserTier multiplier in NFT allocation calculations is unacceptable. Here is Why? 👇🏻 Because Lamumu holders have supported Common from the very beginning, they trusted the project, contributed to the community, and purchased NFTs. Many users hold multiple NFTs across different wallets. Now, these users are receiving smaller rewards simply because they kept their NFTs in separate wallets. This has created a strong sense of unfairness and disappointment within the community. ➡️The vesting model is also unacceptable. Here is Why? 👇🏻 Because this approach completely goes against NFT culture. The Lamumu community has been active and contributing to the Web3 ecosystem for years and has never received NFT airdrops with a vesting model. In NFT projects, nft airdrops have never been distributed in installments or calculated using multipliers. These two decisions have caused fear, concern, and a loss of trust within the community. This mistake must be corrected immediately. ⚠️Remember the biggest reason Common gained global recognition is its community. You have always said, “Community First” If the community truly matters, we demand that our requests be implemented immediately the airdrop calculation codes should be updated and made public. (On Github) ⚠️Otherwise, it will not be possible to control the reaction from the Common community. @dillchen @0xmullet @RhysFH
English
122
53
373
17.6K
eternivity (❖,❖) retweetledi
CryptoMeii
CryptoMeii@crypto_meii·
Hey @Commonfnd @commondotxyz @dillchen ! There shouldn’t be a “User Verification Tier” system for NFTs. This approach unfairly disadvantages genuine holders who choose to distribute their NFTs across multiple wallets. We’ve received a lot of feedback from the community regarding this issue. NFTs shouldn’t have a verification or tier level in Web3 culture, it’s completely normal for users to spread their NFTs across different wallets. Many people avoid keeping all their NFTs in one wallet due to security concerns or the fear of missing out on multiple airdrops. The cliff period for NFTs has also been disappointing. According to community feedback, users who have held their NFTs for over two months felt frustrated about having to wait for a second token distribution. While future plans for NFTs are important, this situation should not have occurred during the TGE. A happy community is vital for Common’s future. There’s no logical reason to apply a tier or multiplier system to NFT holders. The solution is simple: distribute tokens directly to wallets holding the NFTs without any tier or multiplier system. We’re receiving significant feedback from our 4,000member Telegram group, and the community’s shared request is clear: all NFT holders should be treated equally. Implementing a tier system for NFTs could seriously damage community trust and our overall image. My team, our members, and I were not prepared for such an approach. We’ve done our best now we kindly ask that you take our community’s feedback into consideration and act accordingly.
CryptoMeii tweet media
English
48
15
199
7.9K