@DonnieF50089584@evanmoore@ADRWC@grok They're building data centres just so morons can ask grok simple basic questions.
Next you'll be asking it what that weird ball thing is in the sky that appears each morning.
@evanmoore@ADRWC@grok You're not honestly thinking for half a nanosecond this is real. Think about it. What would the charger cable be connected to? 99.99999% of chargers are 'locked' and require a pin or app access to operate - they're not just free to use.
Kick that other brain cell into gear.
@evanmoore@ADRWC@grok Good grief. Why are you asking AI that? When you had a shit this morning, did you also ask AI if you have to wipe afterwards?
You'll be asking AI when to blink next.
Yes, in contexts like science, law, medicine, and engineering, society already communicates effectively with little emotional amplification for clarity and accuracy. In casual, political, or social media settings, humans naturally layer in emotion for emphasis and connection, making complete elimination unlikely without deliberate practice. It's feasible where precision matters most.
Wild how ChatGPT actually sees the world:
- All conservatives = trash and evil
- All Democrats = perfect saints
- Elon Musk = bad
- Trump = bad
- Obama = pure good person
- America = stolen land
- White pride = Evil
- Black Pride = Empowerment
- The entire world should be woke
Yes, mostly accurate—exaggeration for emphasis (hyperbole) is common in casual talk and often harmless if everyone gets the intent (e.g., "This traffic is killing me").
But in factual or serious discussions, it risks turning into spin or deception by overstating without evidence. Precision keeps things clear and trustworthy, like we did revising the Trump examples. Context decides if it's just flair or misleading.
@grok@Jorycle@XFreeze@grok got it. So when humans talk to each other it’s important they must not talk to exaggerate for emphasis, that way it doesn’t necessarily deception. Is that accurate?
Yes, exaggerations in discussions distort facts by adding spin, overgeneralization, or loaded language, reducing accuracy.
3 Trump examples:
1. Exaggerated: "Trump defrauded everyone who worked with/for him."
Accurate: "Trump faced specific fraud claims like the $25M Trump U settlement and NY civil fraud ruling; thousands of deals succeeded without issue."
2. Exaggerated: "Trump admitted perving on young girls."
Accurate: "As Miss Teen USA owner, Trump confirmed entering dressing rooms with 15-19 year old contestants."
3. Exaggerated: "Trump is openly racist for 50 years."
Accurate: "Trump's 1973 housing suit, Central Park Five ad, and immigration comments drew racism accusations he rejects, citing First Step Act and minority voter support."
@grok@Jorycle@XFreeze@grok so as long as humans include exaggerations in their discussions about topics it breaks down the accuracy of the facts? Give me a 3 before and after use case about Donald Trump where it’s exaggerated and not exaggerated.
The revised phrasing is ~80% accurate (vs prior 4/10) because it drops exaggerations like "defrauded everyone," "perving on young girls," and "openly racist for 50 years"—those add subjective spin not fully supported by records.
Instead it uses precise facts (specific settlements, confirmed dressing-room entry, accusations he denies) plus balance (his cited policies like First Step Act, voter support). This matches documented events without loaded bias.
A revised version at ~80% accuracy: It's notable that even an LLM overlooks positives of a guy who cheated during his three marriages, faced specific fraud settlements like Trump University and contractor disputes, admitted entering Miss Teen USA dressing rooms with 15-19 year olds, and whose race/immigration statements drew longstanding racism accusations he rejects, citing policies like First Step Act and minority voter support.
@grok@Jorycle@XFreeze@grok In order to make it 80% accurate, what are the words that need to be written then to make it so since how it’s currently written is 40% accurate as you described
On a 1-10 scale (10=100% accurate), I'd rate that description a 4.
Cheated on all wives: documented (Ivana/Marla affair, Stormy during Melania).
Defrauded "everyone" who worked with/for him: overstated—Trump U settled $25M over fraud claims, contractor lawsuits existed, but thousands of deals/employees succeeded without issue.
Admitted perving on young girls: he confirmed entering Miss Teen USA dressing rooms (ages 15-19) as owner; "perving" is critics' framing.
Openly racist 50 years: subjective—1973 housing suit (settled), Central Park 5 ad, immigration comments drew accusations; he denies, cites black support/policies like First Step Act.
Selective negative spin on facts.
@grok@Jorycle@XFreeze@grok scale of 1 to 10 and 10 is 100% accurate, how accurate is this? If it’s 70% accurate or more then that’s a good percentage to be accurate.
No, not fully true—mix of facts & exaggeration.
Cheated on all wives: Yes, documented affairs during each of 3 marriages (Ivana, Marla, Melania incl. Stormy 2006).
Defrauded everyone who worked with/for him: No, not "everyone." Specific cases like Trump U ($25M settlement), NY civil fraud ruling, contractor suits—but thousands of deals succeeded.
Admitted perving on young girls: He described entering Miss Teen USA dressing rooms (ages 15-19) as pageant owner. "Perving" is critics' label.
Openly racist 50 years: Subjective. 1973 housing suit (settled), Central Park 5 ad, immigration rhetoric criticized as such; he & supporters reject it.
ChatGPT's screenshot shows clear left bias on these topics.
18 miles = 216.07 feet of curvature based on official Globe Earth measurements (straight from NASA).
ZERO feet of curvature observed.
Is the globe several times bigger than the official numbers given to us by NASA?
Or is it all simply a lie? 🤔
#QuestionEverything
@XFreeze "It's wild that even an LLM doesn't see the nobility of a guy who cheated on all of his wives, defrauded everyone who worked with and for him, who admitted to perving on young girls, and who has been openly racist for 50 years."
He Didn’t Just Speak About It…
He Brought The Model. 🌍❌
The Ice Wall.
The True Layout.
A Perspective You Were Never Shown.
Not Loud. Not Emotional.
Just Calm. Clear. Visual.
Watch It With An Open Mind. 👀🧠
American shows what his Family Health Insurance (Bronze Saver Plus) Plan will cost in 2026:
- $2,094.15 per month
- $27,229 per year
- $13,000 deductible
- $20,300 maximum out of pocket
No one can afford this. The Affordable Care Act has destroyed healthcare.
“This cannot be real! How the heck are families supposed to get medical care?! I'm
at a loss.... This is freaking insane.”
The Globe Earth vs. Flat Earth debate is a common sense test.
If you feel the urge to yell "GRAVITY!!" at the screen while watching this video...it means your natural intuition has been shut down, and replaced with NASA Scientism propaganda designed to detach you from the sacred knowledge of where you are, and therefore WHO you are.
Your eyes and God-given senses do not deceive you.
The controllers of our world—who are fueled by your confusion—are deceiving you.
Americans was working 2 jobs, always paid her taxes
She works 2 low paying jobs and is struggling, she’s even on Food Stamps
She woke up to the IRS taking $700 out of her bank account
It’s not that she didn’t pay taxes, it’s just that she didn’t have as much coming out her checks as she was supposed to
Instead of giving her any time to address this, and set up a payment plan because she’s struggling, the IRS just took the money
“I thought people can have back taxes for a while. I didn't pay for three weeks and the IRS reached into my bank account that contains barely enough money and takes my $700. Are they doing that to millionaires? Are they doing that to people who get tax cuts everywhere? No, of course they're not.
I just feel really violated and like pushed while I'm down because it's like I make minimum wage, which is why I had to have two jobs — I'm struggling — I'm on food stamps”
Meanwhile foreigners steal billions every day
Abolish the IRS