blerp

7.4K posts

blerp

blerp

@evans2151

Katılım Ocak 2013
310 Takip Edilen27 Takipçiler
Divinely Designed
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined·
A theory is but one possible interpretation of a set of facts. A theory itself is not a fact.
English
67
8
137
8.6K
blerp
blerp@evans2151·
@DivinelyDesined @metacene_mark Where is the evidence failing. To flip your point on its head, what are the limits on changes that you imagine take place?
English
0
0
0
5
Divinely Designed
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined·
You're equivocating. Fact: Life changes over time. Nobody denies that. Theory: These changes accrue limitlessly, engineering biological novelty gradually via mutation & selection, and all Life is related via common ancestry. That's one way to interpret the data (for which the evidence is seriously failing). Another way is that Life was designed to change and adapt with the changing environment, and similarities are a result of common designed functionality instead of common ancestry. Data can be interpreted to fit both models.
English
5
0
6
135
blerp
blerp@evans2151·
@Octabumization @wisdomXplorer Ah yes you are back to humans gracefully allowing other species to live. Except we cant deliberately wipe any out when we try. Very good!
English
0
0
0
2
Optinominalpupilometry
Optinominalpupilometry@Octabumization·
@evans2151 @wisdomXplorer Because humans allowed them to continue. Poachers threaten their existence constantly and other humans protect them. Dumbass, are you pretending to be stupid at this point?
English
1
0
0
5
WisdomX
WisdomX@wisdomXplorer·
What is actually the best evidence for the existence of God?
English
546
20
203
26.3K
blerp
blerp@evans2151·
@Octabumization @wisdomXplorer Amazing comeback! This has been an amazing ride. From you fundamentally notnunderstanding evolution to your mental gymnastics about humans willing any other species out of existence with a thought has been very funny. Well done.
English
0
0
0
3
Optinominalpupilometry
Optinominalpupilometry@Octabumization·
@evans2151 @wisdomXplorer Example: You want something that's difficult to obtain. You can either earn it or take it. Both are possible Both have consequences. What consequences are you "willing to" or "capable of" accepting?
English
1
0
0
8
blerp
blerp@evans2151·
@Octabumization @wisdomXplorer You: All species live at the discretion of humans, if we willed it theyd be gone. Me: no. You: definitely can Me: well we tried it and it didnt work You: well we could if we really wanted to! Promise!
English
3
0
0
11
blerp
blerp@evans2151·
@Octabumization @wisdomXplorer Like what are uou even saying at this point? If we glassed the planet with nukes that would show humans superiority? Are you stupid? This is so far gone from the point yoi were trying to make.
English
1
0
0
4
Optinominalpupilometry
Optinominalpupilometry@Octabumization·
@evans2151 @wisdomXplorer You don't know the difference between "didn't" and "can't?" I'll simplify it for the simpleton. "You didn't do the dishes because you're lazy." "You can't do the dishes because you have no hands."
English
1
0
0
8
graham philip
graham philip@GPhilip52086·
@ApoloJedi_ the evolutionary hypothesis cannot be falsified, because it's a myth. It explains everything: cruelty, altruism, complexity, life, death, origins...... it is like all myths, immune to disproof. No evolutionist will ever concede to his (they're always white men) myth failing
English
1
0
1
39
ApoloJedi
ApoloJedi@ApoloJedi_·
Not enough generations could have lived for the evolutionary story to be true…even when the belief was that humans and chimps shared 98% of their DNA Now that we know the dissimilarity is greater than 14%, we know that the probability is ZERO that evolution produced humans and chimps from a common ancestor
Creation Ministries International (CMI)@creationnews

Do humans and chimpanzees share 98% of their DNA? A 2025 study published in Nature show that the similarity between humans and chimpanzees dropped to roughly 85%. This is problematic for the evolutionary common ancestry model. creation.com/en/answers/hum…

English
75
51
352
34.8K
Yẹmí
Yẹmí@KR3Wmatic·
@JohnAndersn3c8 So who created the trees, the birds, ocean, and the oxygen you’re breathing?
English
16
0
0
478
Yẹmí
Yẹmí@KR3Wmatic·
If atheists won't accept the Bible as evidence, what can we use to convince them?
English
489
7
73
21K
blerp
blerp@evans2151·
@Octabumization @wisdomXplorer So now its not you snap your fingers and a species disapears, now its "well if we decided to nuke the plant theyd be gone hurr hurr"
English
1
0
0
11
blerp
blerp@evans2151·
@Octabumization @wisdomXplorer I mentioned viruses and bacteria ages ago and you still kept insisting humans could do anything they wanted. So its you whos moving the goalpost.
English
1
0
0
4
Optinominalpupilometry
Optinominalpupilometry@Octabumization·
@evans2151 @wisdomXplorer I've used animals as examples. You moved the goalposts by switching to viruses and bacteria. Which we could still eliminate if nobody minded wiping out significant populations.
English
1
0
0
9
Optinominalpupilometry
Optinominalpupilometry@Octabumization·
@evans2151 @wisdomXplorer We allow bad things to exist because the methods of eradication are considered too extreme. It there was an ebola outbreak in a small town do you think the government or CDC wouldn't burn that town into nothing if they couldn't contain the outbreak? Of course they would.
English
1
0
0
10
Optinominalpupilometry
Optinominalpupilometry@Octabumization·
@evans2151 @wisdomXplorer You getting tired carrying Goalposts? The civilized world has effectively wiped out polio, smallpox and leprosy. We could force the third world to up their game and eradicate these diseases but we don't, we could also just fire bomb the countries into oblivion but we don't.
English
2
0
0
16