eveXeve

@KarolineGosling Why not raise them above such destructive isms ?

I look forward to raising my daughters as extreme sexist misogynists.

@welkinsedre @KarolineGosling Hope ? Well our guests won't leave and they have way more offspring then we have so... do the math

@eveeye93 @KarolineGosling Is there hope for das deutsche Volk, Eve? How popular is AfD?

Germany is failing because it is socially-illegal to be a German. Germans are seen as racist, sexist, uncool, unfunny and made to feel ashamed for.. being German? Turkish people celebrate being Turkish in Germany Syrians celeberate being Syrian in Germany But to be a German and be proud of being German.. in Germany.. You get hated and cancelled. The only thing white, german people are allowed to be proud of in Germany.. is LGBTQ and Gayness

@welkinsedre @KarolineGosling Getting more popular every day but I don't think they are the solution ....

@NevissonJ @thuraltingwazzz Yeah? You want some old German lore ?

@eveeye93 @thuraltingwazzz Sounds like another great storytelling session in the near future )

How the average group of girls look at me when I start ranting about how the modern syncretism of Anglo-Saxon Paganism’s "Triple Goddess" is a blend of the Norns with folk echoes of Frigg/Holda as fate/seasonal guardians, Brigantia (Brigid) & Britain’s Romano-Celtic Matres triads

@MGTOWolverine @Pat_Stedman Maybe he should convert to Islam

First of all he is quoting scripture incorrectly to justify sex as a duty, secondly sex has nothing to do with love and validation, as many love more without ever had sex, to family or friends. Lastly he is trying to justify polygamy or force wife to which is heretical. If the attraction is gone why continue? Or man needs to get into shape and stop being a pussy as demanding or doing favors to get sex is a turn off.

In a marriage, two are made to become one. Paul discusses sex in this context directly, “do not withhold from each other, except for short periods that are mutually agreed upon.” This is the nature of the cooperative, giving dynamic that defines a healthy marriage. Withholding from the person you married, while simultaneously refusing to allow them to see other people, is fundamentally manipulative and controlling. There is no other way to look at it. “Unless I decide I want it, you can’t have sex.” Consider if we changed the act in question and said “unless I decide I want to have a conversation, you can’t speak.” We would obviously consider this to be absurdly abusive. You have every right to not talk to someone, but if you do this you do not have a right to stop them from talking to other people. And yet this is what so many women think they are entitled to do when it comes to sex in a marriage. What defines a marriage beyond anything else is exclusive sexual access. This means that good faith when it comes to sex is required to keep a marriage a marriage. That is the contract. That doesn’t mean of course that a man shouldn’t do what he can to make his woman feel cherished, unburdened, and aroused. It certainly doesn’t mean he should simply demand sex while doing nothing for her. However virtually no men are saying they want to take advantage of a woman like this. It’s a straw man argument. What they are saying is that they are tired of having sex - which is how men feel validated in their masculinity and connected to a woman - constantly weaponized as a way to get them to do things. They are tired of something they expected to have at least somewhat regularly when they signed the marriage papers being contingent on constantly shifting, amorphous emotional goal posts. Which is why the entire framing of the post below is bad faith. Rather than say “I agree this is what men need, but just remember this is what women need too,” it is instead “how dare my husband feel entitled to sex when I don’t feel like it, and by the way it's his fault I don't.” The former seeks to find common ground and bring men and women closer together, the latter is entitlement, and seeks to turn a cooperative dynamic that has a misunderstanding into a power dynamic with winners and losers. Which is unfortunate, because when someone is acting in bad faith that means nothing you do will ever be enough for them. They will seek maximum extraction rather than reasonable contribution. To the extent you get anything you want from these people, it’s only by humiliating yourself, and even these scraps are only transient. It’s like negotiating with a terrorist. So all you can do with these women is prepare to leave. Often this wakes a woman up, because without the ability to control you, her win-lose game shifts into lose-lose. Your willingness to walk is deterrence - you are escalating the costs of her behavior - and when you are dealing with bad faith women this is the only way to change the dynamic. The bottom line is this: Never stay with a woman who weaponizes intimacy against you. So long as a woman is in the state of mind where this is acceptable, she is incapable of receiving love, and incapable of creating a mutually fulfilling relationship. You can't fix problems with her because she is not interested in working as a team. And for the jaded guys out there, this really isn't all women. There are plenty of good ones out there. But they don't respect men who don't respect themselves, and you won't attract them until you stop letting bad women control you.

@djmazzafakka @MGGA2021h Und jetzt alle zusammen

@MGGA2021h Schafsprech

Was ist das für eine Sprache? Grünisch? 🤔

@lovelifewithk I don't think that's what men are made for ...

I want a man who protects my feelings.🤍 .⁣ .⁣ .⁣ .

@thuraltingwazzz Thank you for this well worded answer. That answers my questions. 👌🏻

Apologies for this super late response. Been wrapped up in a lot of stuff all afternoon. So, my answer to your first question is also an answer to your second question. “Aryan” refers to “white” people in this context in a sense, but it moreso applies to the broad range of caucasoid-type ethnicities that span from europe, north africa, and parts of asia (but mainly europe). Originally, it was the proto-indo-iranian people who held the aryan title (iranian means aryan). They were steppe nomads from the area of modern ukraine, and by way of the horse, they spread their cultural influence into southern asia over time. Eventually, they split into the indo-iranians and the indo-aryans. The indo-iranians would go on to settle persia, and they composed the avestas, which ended up laying the groundwork for zoroastrianism. But the indo-aryans would go on to settle india. They composed the vedas, which gave rise the dharmic religions, and thus asia’s tantric tradition. So, essentially, this is what connects us to them in the most obvious way (although complex still) We share with them a direct linguistic, cultural, and genetic relationship. Strictly by genetic standards, the other ethnicities that aryans interacted with back then were from a totally separate lineage—like us in being the hybridized genetic experiment of a group of gods, but unlike us in terms of how we favor our own—they’re imbued with the aspects of another racial pantheon. Despite this though, the human gods must share a common ancestor somewhere because they’re humanoid. Evolution’s a real function of life (even at a cosmic scale) so I still see mankind a being a kind of ape, just a uh…extremely alien ape. I’m sure a chimp would say the same.

AMA—Ask Me Anything Like Mímir, I’ll answer.😃

@thuraltingwazzz And when you say Aryans do you think of quite people or do you agree that other races are probably also deriving from them? I love your answer and kinda seeing a lot similiar to this. I m still kinda wondering what connects us to the eastern tantric traditions for example.

Good question. Very good question, actually. Short answer: Yes Long answer: It may sound extremely fringe, but overall, I generally agree with the theosophical perspective on our origins. Modern Aryans are considered the “fifth root race”, and we’re roughly a ~1,000,000yr old race, give or take several hundred thousand years. Personally, I think this may be overestimated a bit. I’d say ~500,000yrs sounds like a more reasonable estimate, but this is just a guesstimate on my part too (the theosophical society doesn’t claim total accuracy either). Also, it must be stated how the “hyperborean” title in theosophy is applied to an even older, *non-physical* race. They’re considered the second root race, and they have an untold age of origin, but they’re also considered long-gone. This is another detail where my opinion diverges from theosophy’s terminology, because it isn’t true to hyperborea’s greek origin of neither its name, nor its (most notorious) legend that gives us our modern understanding of *what* hyperborea is—which, at the most basic level, according to our greek sources (Hesiod ~8th-7th century BCE, Herodotus ~5th century BCE, Pindar, etc.), the hyperboreans were a simply immortal people who lived “beyond (hyper-) the north wind (-boreas)” in a northern paradise. They were associated with Apollo, eternal spring, long life, and bliss. No disease, war, or old age in the ideal versions. So, even to the ancient greek perspective, they considered hyperboreans to be a very, very old race of immortal Aryans—that much we can be certain of.

@humbleprussian Yes

@eveeye93 no i dont think so. is it this?

i watch 👀

@humbleprussian Have you seen the Faust silent movie ?

@eveeye93 amazing how powerful, foreseeing and relevant it is 100 years later

@eveeye93 klaro 👍

da will ich wohnen

@WBUmbrellacorp Retardation sells

Do you have your 2026 retard pass??

@WBUmbrellacorp 🤣🤐

@humbleprussian The messenger between head and hands has to be the heart ❤️ one of my favorites

Being a lover and a muse are, in many ways, at odds with each other. A lover is known, deeply vulnerable, and fully human, while a muse remains an abstraction, an ideal, a misty mirage just out of reach. Does intimacy threaten enchantment? Once someone is fully known, can they remain a source of wonder and inspiration? Perhaps an ideal relationship integrates both through motion and mutual evolution. A dynamic romance. Instead of preserving mystery through distance, mystery arises through growth. After all, no person is ever truly finished. Maybe love itself is an ever-expanding universe, with new horizons, new seasons, and changing light that colors the landscape differently each day. The beloved remains a muse not because they keep parts of themself hidden, but because they continue to unfold.

@KarolineGosling We could also just look at wrong ideals that are media promoted or projections cuz most people don't even know themselves ... or just incompatibility cuz astrology 😘

Women are not nearly as nice or as loyal as men If you speak to most people who divorce, it was always the wife that turned evil not the husband Media and women try lie and say it is alway the man But it is usually the woman who will ruin their ex husbands life.. just because. Women have an evil gene that men do not have..