eyshel10

Sure, #JungKook has had viral campaigns for @CalvinKlein before, but this time, for the first time, he's had an active hand in designing the collection he's selling. In an exclusive interview, the #BTS hitmaker tells GQ about his blockbuster CKJK collection, his passion for motorcycles, and how his hand tattoos inspired his new signature underwear: gq.visitlink.me/py_PLB

Madonna, Shakira and BTS will co-headline the first-ever FIFA World Cup™ Final Halftime Show at the New York New Jersey Stadium on July 19.   Curated by Coldplay's Chris Martin and produced by Global Citizen, the show will raise funds for the FIFA Global Citizen Education Fund, improving access to quality education and football for children around the world.

We have the worst batch of Sentors of the Republic! 🤮🤮🤮 Salute to the House of Representatives! 🫡 Good job kau sa akin👏 #HouseOfRepresentatives #SenateOfthePhilippines

Inspiring a nation 🇵🇭 Alex Eala | #TennisParadise

@DjokerNole @carlosalcaraz @AustralianOpen 25th will never be impossible Nole! Keep going and Nole fam is behind your back... Congrats to Carlos!!!💪💪💪

Bravo Carlos, little titan, young wizard of Oz. A worthy champion, a huge talent, wonderful person and history-maker 🙌 And Australia, so much love 🫶🏼. No place like the happy slam. Forever grateful.

I express my closeness to the people of the Philippines who have been hit by a violent typhoon: I pray for the deceased and their families, as well as for the injured and displaced.

@DjokerNole @RolexPMasters Rest and recover well and come back strong💪🙏

Dear Paris, unfortunately I’ll not compete at this year’s @RolexPMasters. I have amazing memories and great success over the years, especially being able to conquer the title 7 times. Hope to see you next year. Merci 🙏🏼

DON'T RETIRE! 😥 Take a break and come back strong again! @DjokerNole #RolexShanghaiMasters #NoleFam #novakdjokovic

Yung clamor namin mga Pilipino na mawala ang corruption, and yet these lawmakers, hindi ginagawa ang trabaho nila! #NoToBudgetInsertions #StopCorruption #MahiyaNamanKayo

Oh my binjin heart💙💜💙💜 So the feelings started in the promotions of The Negotiation🥰 #Hyunbin #SonYeJin #BinJinFan

@MarckEspejooo Ok lang yan, sabay sabay tau nasasaktan!haha Pero salamat sa pinakita nyo na kaya na namakipagcompete sa Best of the Best! Bravo Alas!

Tiktok tama kana masakit na hahahaha 🥲

@PHNMVT Thank you Alas, nakakaproud kayo! Hindi kayo nagpatinag sa mga Top Teams!

IT WAS A HISTORIC JOURNEY INDEED 🥹 Maybe it's not our time yet but still, LABAN PILIPINAS! 🇵🇭 SEE YOU SA SEA GAMES, BOYS! BAWI TAYO! 🫵🇵🇭 #MWCH2025 #AlasPilipinas

Good Job Boys!👏👏👏 All we are praying is a set win, but the Lord gave us a Win! Laban Alas Pilipinas! One more W! Really, Bagunas is World Class! #AlasPilipinas #fivbworldchampionship2025 #BryanBagunas #PHMensVolleyballTeam

OMG, our ALAS Mens Volleyball team is making a history in the World Championship.... Kapit ALAS!💪 #AlasPilipinas #fivbworldchampionship2025 #Philippines

@PhilippineStar Malaki na naman makukurakot dito! Haaaay!

The United States announced yesterday P13.8 billion ($250 million) in foreign assistance to the Philippines toward strengthening health systems, improving disease detection and response capabilities and enhancing maternal and child health services in the country. tinyurl.com/bdd2efkt

That's OK. You have nothing to prove. Just keep on playing until you get that GS trophies again. No doubt .... you will again. @DjokerNole #USOpen2025 #NoleFam #NovakDjokovic

@maynilad ano nah? Kailan ang reconnection namin?

@inquirerdotnet I'm confused, sino po ba gumagawa ng batas? House at Senate d po b? Saan po nanggaling yun mga additional requirements ng Supreme Court sa Impeachment case? Pinagdebatehan po sa legislative iyon? Or pwede na sila magbago ng batas directly? Tama po ba iyon?

Retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Adolfo Azcuna has pushed back against Senate President Francis “Chiz” Escudero’s criticism of former justices who have spoken out against the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling that voided the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. READ MORE: inqnews.net/AzcunaRebutsEs…

@rapplerdotcom Sana marami pang mahuli... napakadami nyan!

Former Palawan governor and aide convicted of graft for misusing P1.585 billion in Malampaya royalties, sentenced to up to 110 years in prison rappler.com/philippines/sa…

READ!!! READ!!! READ!!! 🚨🚨 THE ULTIMATE CALL FROM FORMER CHIEF JUSTICE REYNATO PUNO OFFICIAL STATEMENT PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION (PhilConsa) On the Supreme Court Ruling in G.R. No. 278353 “Sara Z. Duterte vs. House of Representatives, et al.” July 30, 2025 The Philippine Constitution Association (PhilConsa) expresses its serious concern over the Supreme Court’s ruling in G.R. No. 278353, which nullified the impeachment proceedings initiated by the House of Representatives against Vice President Sara Z. Duterte. With due respect to the Honorable Court, we believe this decision overreaches constitutional boundaries, disrupts the separation of powers, and weakens Congress’ exclusive authority to hold impeachable officers accountable. ⸻ The Facts Cannot Be Ignored Between December 2024 and February 2025, four impeachment complaints were filed against Vice President Duterte. The first three complaints, though officially docketed, were never pursued. They were neither found sufficient in form and substance nor referred for committee hearings. On February 5, 2025, a fourth complaint—this time endorsed by 215 members of the House, more than the required one-third—was transmitted as Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, in full accordance with the Constitution. Yet on July 25, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled that the fourth complaint was barred under the one-year rule in Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution, on the theory that the filing of earlier complaints—even if not acted upon—already “initiated” the impeachment process. ⸻ This Interpretation Is Constitutionally Flawed PhilConsa respectfully but firmly disagrees with this interpretation. The one-year bar rule was designed to prevent harassment through repeated impeachment proceedings—not to protect impeachable officers from ever facing trial by allowing them to take cover behind mere filings. As the Court itself held in Francisco v. House of Representatives, impeachment is only deemed initiated after the complaint is found sufficient in form and substance and referred to the Committee on Justice. The earlier complaints never reached that stage. To treat them as having “initiated” proceedings defies both logic and constitutional intent. This ruling invites dangerous abuse. It opens the door for impeachable officials—or their allies—to deliberately file weak or premature complaints to “consume” the one-year window and block any real effort at accountability. This is not a safeguard against harassment—it is a blueprint for evasion. ⸻ Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism This case called for judicial restraint, not judicial activism. The Constitution gave the House of Representatives the sole power to initiate impeachment and the Senate the sole power to try and decide it. These are textual, exclusive powers, and the Judiciary’s role in such matters should be limited to clear, grave abuses that nullify constitutional norms. Instead, the Court stepped into the heart of a political process already underway—substituting its own judgment for that of a constitutional majority of the House. It interpreted the one-year bar so broadly that it now disables the very mechanism of impeachment in all but the rarest cases. This ruling, though perhaps well-intentioned, is a clear instance of judicial activism. It turns the Judiciary from a neutral guardian of the Constitution into an arbiter of congressional timing and internal processes—matters the Constitution never assigned to the courts. Judicial activism, if unchecked, becomes judicial supremacy. And that supremacy can, over time, paralyze the political departments that the people themselves empowered. ⸻see comment for cont. 👇🏻