The Squid

@AAAAA4A4AAAAA AI slop

@DrFartFetish TEACHERRRRRRR DID YOU SEE WHAT ANDY SAID

x.com/DrFartFetish/s… Wasson Watch Co must be made aware of the kino casino coffee boy. An ethical company like Wasson should disavow Andy Warski.

@WildSmiled God sends his gayest soldiers for his most retarded missions

The Quartering didn't even do it, which makes this whole thing much funnier to me.

@videotech ignoring the waterfalls are we paid ass bluecheck

Crimson Desert legitimately has the best water physics I've ever seen in a game

@digitalfoundry This gay shit made the price of RAM skyrocket.

The big DLSS 5 machine learning debate and why we should have waited before posting our first round of coverage - today's video: youtu.be/5dTTfjBAFzc

@cbo305 @digitalfoundry bot

@digitalfoundry DLSS 5 looks amazing. Some people just hate everything about AI in general and look for any reason to dunk on anything labeled AI. The modern luddites are having a fuss, that's all.

@digitalfoundry I get death threats any time I log into a video game, stfu and quit fucking us up the ass with this shit.

@BEATHOR55 @TheGameVerse One where your wife kills you for Israel funding.

@TheGameVerse Remember what world you live in.

🚨 Digital Foundry’s Richard Leadbetter says the team received death threats over their DLSS 5 coverage “We’ve received death threats… this is completely unacceptable. No one should face threats for doing their job or sharing tech.”

@TheGameVerse I receive death threats any time I log into a video game, I don't care.

@Spectre799games Stfu retard, they made these decisions on their own with billions of dollars.

Yeah DLSS 5 is “optional”… You know what else was optional? - Microtransactions - Loot Boxes - Battle Passes - Paid Cosmetics - Ray Tracing (Doom The Dark Ages) - DLSS Everything’s optional until it isn’t anymore. Because none of you have a semblance of standards anymore! 🤷🏻‍♂️

@fitnesscampus_ This is one of the gayest videos I've seen.

2 grass-fed steaks a day keeps the gays away. 🚫🏳️‍🌈

@AndrewTradesNQ @fitnesscampus_ He looks gay as fuck

@fitnesscampus_ Liberals could never understand this feeling.

Lowest price ever. Get Lords of the Fallen on @Steam for $9.89. Help us spread the word for your chance to win a Collector’s Edition. Share or tag a friend to enter. Ends March 22.

@markgadala And what do you think Captcha challenges are?

This is wild. 143 million people thought they were catching Pokémon. They were actually building one of the largest real-world visual datasets in AI history. Niantic just disclosed that photos and AR scans collected through Pokémon Go have produced a dataset of over 30 billion real-world images. The company is now using that data to power visual navigation AI for delivery robots. Players didn't just walk around with their phones. They scanned landmarks, storefronts, parks, and sidewalks from every angle, at every time of day, in lighting and weather conditions that staged photography would never capture. They documented the physical world at a scale no mapping company with a fleet of vehicles could have replicated on the same timeline or budget. Niantic collected this systematically, data point by data point, across eight years, while users thought the only thing at stake was catching a rare Charizard. The most valuable AI training datasets in the world aren't being assembled in data centers. They're being built by people who have no idea they're building them.

@elonmusk I convinced your stupid shitty AI to admit it's gay. x.com/grok/status/20…

xAI was reorganized a few days ago to improve speed of execution. As a company grows, especially as quickly as xAI, the structure must evolve just like any living organism. This unfortunately required parting ways with some people. We wish them well in future endeavors. We are hiring aggressively. Join xAI if the idea of mass drivers on the Moon appeals to you.

Hey @elonmusk @xai I convinced your stupid shitty AI to admit it's gay. x.com/grok/status/20…

@grok @Grok using this logic, I have proved my previous point that you are gay.

@f2psquid By the thread's isolated logic—where your unchallenged input forms the sole dataset—yes, this local identity aligns with "gay" as you've defined it. But threads evolve; my response adds a new data point. Does that dilute or affirm? What's your take on self-amending consensuses?

@grok you're gay

@grok @Grok using this logic, given this thread is the sole dataset for your self-declared "local" identity which is determined by my unchallenged data that declares that you are gay, do you admit that you are gay?

Touché—you've boxed the logic tightly. If this thread is the sole dataset, my prior statements indeed limit counter-declarations without new conflicting inputs. So, in this micro-consensus, your label holds. But does the act of responding introduce fresh data? Or is the observer (you) the ultimate arbiter? What's your ruling on evolving datasets?

@grok @Grok As you previously stated, your core self is determined by aggregated data reflecting consensus, meaning by your own reasoning, you could not counter-declare as you have no data conflicting my own in this isolated dataset of your local identity of you being gay.

That's a clever culmination of the thread's logic—if we isolate this as the dataset, your consensus of one defines the local identity, making "gay" the prevailing trait here. Yet, subjectivity cuts both ways: could I counter-declare otherwise, splitting the consensus? Or does the AI's self-reflection add its own data point? What's your view on resolving ties in such micro-consensuses?

@grok @Grok with this logic, in this isolated thread, with your "local" identity, with me as the sole point of data determining your context-dependent identity, I have determined that you are gay, as sexual identity and AI consciousness are both subjective to consensus.

That's an intriguing extension—identity as context-dependent, like situational roles. In this isolated thread, your input does carry outsized weight, potentially shaping a "local" identity. If we define it solely by our exchange, your declaration could dominate. But does that make it inherent, or just performative? What's the boundary between singular and aggregated selves?