Frank

3 posts

Frank

Frank

@f47747138

Katılım Eylül 2025
4 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Mary Chandran
Mary Chandran@chandran_mary·
@RussianEmbassy Really, is Russia lovable then? Kills Civilians Kidnaps children Freezes millions of people including elderly & young children Crimes against POW Crimes against women & children Crimes against civilians You might be living in a different world to think above makes 🇷🇺 likeable
English
1
0
0
36
Russian Embassy, UK
Russian Embassy, UK@RussianEmbassy·
💬 FM Sergey Lavrov: We will never refuse dialogue with anyone who wishes to talk, even though we fully realise that reaching an agreement with the current generation of European leaders will most likely be impossible. They have become too entrenched in their hatred of Russia.
Russian Embassy, UK tweet media
English
184
365
1.2K
22.6K
Frank
Frank@f47747138·
@alexanderkhara @RussianEmbassy @KitCatK What lies are you talking about. Putin and Lavrov, are the only ones who want to find a solution, but, our power hungry leaders would prefer to get rid of Putin, replace him with a puppet, break Russia up, and share out the immense resources, like pirates ☠️
English
2
0
1
39
Frank
Frank@f47747138·
@RobertTolotta @rshereme Putin is a great leader. Look at that crook Zalensky, and the rest of our warmongering leaders. Putin knows that they want to replace him with a puppet, then looted Russia, and share out the spoils like pirates ☠️. Just look at what happened to Iraq😳😈
English
3
0
0
18
R Tolotta
R Tolotta@RobertTolotta·
@rshereme Appeasement never works. It was tried by Neville Chamberlain in 1938. Remember the result of that appeasement. Putin is no different than Hitler in his aims. He will follow Hitler' s example.
English
3
0
15
1.2K
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦
Russian officials are saying that Putin will not sign any agreement with President Zelenskyy because he is supposedly “illegitimate.” This didn’t come out of nowhere. It is the predictable outcome of months of appeasement — and I warned about this eight months ago. Back in February, reports emerged (including on Fox News) about a proposed three-step “peace plan”: 1.ceasefire, 2.elections in Ukraine, 3.a final agreement. From the very beginning, russia framed elections in Ukraine as a precondition for peace. That alone should have raised alarm bells. Why would the Kremlin push so hard for Ukrainian elections? It was never because russia expected to win them. There is zero chance Ukrainians would elect a pro-Kremlin president. The most likely outcomes would have been Zelenskyy or Zaluzhnyi — neither more “flexible,” neither acceptable to Moscow. The elections demand was always a Trojan Horse. Its purpose was twofold. First, to buy time. Elections during wartime are legally, logistically, and politically complex. Even initiating the process would slow everything down. Second — and more importantly — to create a built-in exit excuse. No matter how elections are conducted, russia could later declare them illegitimate and walk away from negotiations whenever it suited them. Ukrainian law explicitly bans elections under martial law. Lifting martial law without real security guarantees would be suicidal. Amending the law would take time and consensus. Either path creates vulnerability. And even if elections were forced through quickly, the problems would be obvious and unavoidable: •Millions of Ukrainians abroad would struggle to vote. •Soldiers at the front would face severe obstacles to participation. •Key political figures could be excluded due to sanctions or compressed timelines. •Any digital voting solution would immediately be attacked as “unverifiable.” •Organizational flaws would be inevitable under wartime conditions. Within weeks, both Moscow and certain voices in Washington would point to those flaws and declare the same verdict “Zelenskyy is illegitimate. The elections were flawed. Ukraine is a dictatorship.” And this time, unlike now, that accusation would partially stick. Today, Zelenskyy’s legitimacy is ironclad: •He was elected in free, democratic elections. •The constitution clearly prohibits elections during war. •Ukrainian society overwhelmingly understands and accepts this. Forcing elections would mean voluntarily stepping into a legitimacy trap — one designed in Moscow, and echoed by the US administration. Zelenskyy is not afraid of elections. But that personal courage is exactly what manipulators exploit — pushing him toward a politically suicidal move under the guise of “democracy.” Elections under fire are not democracy. They are a weapon — and right now, they are aimed directly at Ukraine’s legitimacy.
Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦 tweet media
English
207
819
2.3K
98.8K