Aridane

Varios funcionarios de la ONU amenazan con dimitir después de que correos electrónicos internos revelaran cómo el liderazgo superior coordinó con diplomáticos israelíes para suavizar el lenguaje sobre crímenes de guerra en informes oficiales. Un miembro del personal: «Nos hemos convertido en una agencia de relaciones públicas para el genocidio.» Vía @OpsHQs 👇👇👇👇

Israel killed every single person in this photo in Lebanon. Every. Single. One. All journalists. Targeted and assassinated intentionally. For reporting the truth from the frontlines.

La periodista libanesa Amal Khalil ha sido asesinada en Al-Tiri, en el sur del Líbano, en un doble ataque israelí que golpeó el mismo lugar cuando ya intentaban socorrer a las víctimas. Quedó atrapada bajo los escombros y pasó horas esperando un rescate que no llegó. Las ambulancias no podían acceder porque las fuerzas israelíes continuaban disparando, incluso contra quienes asistían a los heridos. Amal Khalil era una reportera veterana que ya había recibido amenazas. Su compañera, la periodista Zeinab Faraj, resultó herida, pero ha sobrevivido. Más de 250 periodistas han sido asesinados por Israel en Gaza, Cisjordania y Líbano. Una cifra insoportable que sigue creciendo.

Últimamente no he colgado nada en español porque la situación en España me deprime bastante. Un ejemplo es este anuncio del PP sobre ocho medidas si llega al gobierno, que aquí incluyo. Fijémonos en estas ocho medidas. Una, la ley sobre ELA, afecta a una minoría muy pequeña del país. Sí, tener esta enfermedad es una desgracia, pero estamos hablando de 900 casos al año en un país que se acerca ya a los 50 millones de habitantes. Es “buenismo” en su manifestación más mediocre. Otra, bajar el IVA de los productos básicos, es demagógica y en contra de la teoría económica básica. Modificar la Ley Presupuestaria para que haya un mayor control sobre el gasto en defensa y seguridad resulta irrelevante. Y las otras varían entre lo necesario pero no muy importante (la independencia del CIS) y lo esperpéntico (modificar la Ley de Costas). España tiene cuatro problemas existenciales: 1) Fecundidad. 2) Inmigración. 3) Falta de crecimiento de los salarios reales. 4) Vivienda. Ni una de estas medidas tiene nada que ver con 1)-4) (excepto, de pasada, la ley antiocupación). ¿Por qué? Porque cualquier cosa que de verdad contribuya a la solución de 1)-4) implicaría sacrificios para los votantes del PP: personas de más de 55 años que quieren dejar todo como está. De hecho, la ley antiocupación se menciona porque protege los derechos de propiedad de los mayores. Feijóo y el PP, más en general, tienen la idea del futuro de España de una ameba porque a sus votantes el futuro de España les trae el fresco mientras su pensión se pague y el precio de su piso no caiga. Y nada de lo que yo (o cualquier otro) pueda decir será capaz de mover ese macizo carpetovetónico.

We're not processing this properly. 72,551 humans. Killed. Memories, families, relationships, bloodlines... Gone. With thousands more in Lebanon too.

International Law is DEAD It died when the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu and NOT ONE country he visited enforced it. The UN passed countless ceasefire resolutions for Gaza. Ignored. The ICJ ruled Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza is ILLEGAL under international law. Also ignored. When you start enforcing International Law for EVERYONE, then you can quote it.

La BBC ha recopilado pruebas de más de 160 niños palestinos que fueron deliberadamente disparados en la cabeza por francotiradores israelíes en Gaza. Los informes dicen lo siguiente: "Los judíos israelíes cazan niños por diversión."

France is on the eve of voting one of the most shameful laws in its history: it would effectively outlaw criticism of Israel and criminalize any speech seen as even remotely sympathetic to whoever the French government chooses to designate a "terrorist group." In effect this law would turn France's foreign policy into unchallengeable dogma backed by prison time. You could literally be sent for 5 years in prison if you, for instance, call what France says are "terrorists" a "resistance group." Think for instance Nelson Mandela during the apartheid (the ANC was on every Western terrorist list) or, heck, France's own Résistance against Nazi Germany - designated as "terrorists" by the Vichy regime and the Nazi occupation. It's frankly absolutely insane. The new law is called "loi Yadan" after its author Caroline Yadan, a MP who represents French expatriates living in Israel. The U.S. has congressmen paid by AIPAC: France has cut out the middleman entirely, we have MPs whose constituency is literally in Israel. The law has already passed committee and heads to a full parliamentary vote on April 16th - 3 days from now - under a very unusual fast-track procedure. Seven of eleven parliamentary groups have said they'll vote yes and the law is expected to pass. What does the law say? Let me quote from it directly (full text here: assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): 1) Article 1 introduces the concept of "implicit" provocation to terrorism and punishes it with five years imprisonment and a fine of €75,000 That's the one I was speaking about. Under this provision, describing anyone France designates as terrorist as a "resistance movement" - the way France describes its own Résistance against Nazi occupation - could effectively become a crime. The key concept is what does "implicit provocation to terrorism" mean? Nobody knows. And that's the point. It means whatever a prosecutor wants it to mean: a perfectly good case could be made that, for instance, quoting international law on the right of occupied peoples to resist with respect to Hamas is, in fact, "implicit provocation to terrorism." France's most famous anti-terrorism judge, Marc Trévidic, says he has never seen anything like it in his entire career (x.com/CharliesIngall…): "Implicit provocation to terrorism: do you realize what that means? Becoming a censor of other people's thoughts, trying to guess what a person really meant." 2) The same article also expands the terrorism apology offense to include "minimizing or trivializing acts of terrorism in an outrageous manner." This is even crazier: until now, "apology of terrorism" meant actually expressing a favorable judgment of "terrorist acts" (which is already insane because, as we all know, one person's terrorist is another's freedom fighter). Well, under this new provision, a judge could decide that providing context, explaining root causes, or insufficiently condemning an act amounts to "trivializing" terrorism - and that would now be punishable with 5 years in prison. So, for instance, a history teacher explaining the origins of Hamas or Hezbollah is providing context - but a prosecutor could argue that contextualization is trivialization. The same reasoning could apply to a journalist, a researcher, or anyone on social media who says "yes, it was terrible, but here's why it happened." The "but" becomes a crime, as it is trivialization. 3) Article 4 expands Holocaust denial law Under current French law, denying the Holocaust is already a crime. This provision extends that crime by specifying that contestation of crimes against humanity now includes, "whatever its formulation, a negation, minimization, or outrageous trivialization" of those crimes. Again with "outrageous trivialization"! In this instance the very authors of the text - Caroline Yadan and her colleagues - explain their reasoning explicitly in the law's preamble (assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/17/textes/…): "Comparing the State of Israel to the Nazi regime would thereby be punishable as an outrageous trivialization of the Shoah." So while the provision is written in general terms, its architects are openly saying what it's for: making it a crime to draw any parallel between Israel's actions and those of the Nazis. 4) Article 2 creates a brand new crime: calling for the destruction of a state. The law adds to an existing 1881 press law a provision punishing anyone who "publicly, in disregard of the right of peoples to self-determination and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, calls for the destruction of a state recognized by the French Republic." Five years imprisonment, €75,000 fine. The qualifiers about self-determination and the UN Charter are meant to sound reassuring. But what does "destruction" mean? In practice, if you advocate for a one-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians live as equals, you are de-facto calling for the "destruction" of the state of Israel. Well, that would now be punishable by 5 years in prison 🤷 There you go. Absolutely insane: if this new law passes, and it unfortunately very much looks like it will, France - the country that gave the world the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the country whose national identity is built on the Résistance - will have made it illegal to use the word 'resistance' about anyone the government doesn't like. Jean Moulin would be prosecuted. De Gaulle would be prosecuted. The only people who wouldn't be prosecuted are those who stay silent. Which, of course, is the whole point.

El Museo Británico elimina la palabra “Palestina" de sus exposiciones sobre el antiguo Oriente Medio La institución dice que la palabra utilizada en algunos mapas y etiquetas “ha perdido su neutralidad original” The Telegraph, medio que da la noticia, utiliza, sin pudor, el verbo admitir: “La institución admite que la palabra Palestina ha perdido su neutralidad original”. Es decir, aunque Palestina existió y existe, la borramos. Quitar la palabra Palestina no es neutralidad: es censura, posicionamiento con el apartheid colonial israelí y ocultación de la verdad. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/02/1…

Number of journalists killed in wars: WWI: 69-79 journalists in 4 years. WWII: 67-69 journalists in 6 years. Korean War: 17 journalists in 3 years. US Civil War: 0-10 journalists in 4 years. Vietnam War: 63 journalists in 20 years. Cambodia War: 15-20 journalists in 8 years. Yugoslavia War: 50-60 journalists in 10 years. Afghanistan War: 100 journalists in 20 years. Iraq War: 150 journalists in 9 years. Palestine: ~300 journalists in 2 years. The media won’t tell you this but Israel has killed more journalists in Gaza than all journalists killed in the World Wars I and II, Korea, US Civil War, Vietnam, Cambodia, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, and Iraq. Does the world condemn the killing of journalists or is it complicated when it is Middle Eastern journalists?

@atalaveraEcon Curioso observar cuándo empiezan a diverger esos dos parámetros.

Enésima evidencia de que preguntar a la gente por la situación económica es pura esquizofrenia. La economía va fatal pero a los hogares les va bastante bien. El eventual cambio de gobierno debería ayudar a juntar estas dos líneas.

La BBC ha recopilado pruebas de que Israel ha estado disparando deliberadamente a los niños en la cabeza y el pecho. Más del 60 % de los niños asesinados presentaban este patrón de lesiones. No habrá justicia en este mundo hasta que el Gobierno de Israel sea juzgado en La Haya.

🇷🇺: Illegally annexes 🇮🇱: Changes the map

@dolphin_dane An incredible song, an awful staging, sorry

And if I say I like the staging

EU Commission press briefing yesterday: Journalist: You've said that Russia should repay for reconstruction of Ukraine. Do you believe Israel should repay for reconstruction of Gaza? EU chief spox: It’s an interesting question, on which I have no comment at this stage.

Stop pretending this started on October 7,this video is 34 years old.

IMAGINE SENDING 20 WARSHIPS TO INTERCEPT BOATS CARRYING MILK POWDER AND BABY FORMULA FOR STARVING CHILDREN. THIS IS THE GREATEST EVIL EXISTING IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW!!!!!

"non-political identity" "unity, solidarity and fellowship" oh shut the fuck up