🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳

2.2K posts

🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳 banner
🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳

🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳

@fab_ags

Computer scientist, musician, traveller, polyglot, IR enthusiast. My 1st account, @Fabme (active since 2007), was hacked. Using this one to recover it.

Lisbon, Portugal Katılım Şubat 2025
364 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳
My account @Fabme was hacked, someone managed to log in, change my email and phone number and now I can't access it again. That account was created in 2007 and I've never had this problem before. Now I'm trying to recover it and I created this account for this sole purpose.
English
3
0
1
3.2K
🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳 retweetledi
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
“Why didn’t Artemis II photograph the Apollo landing sites?” Because there was no reason to. We already have the images - high-resolution, crystal-clear proof sitting right there for anyone who isn’t terminally online and allergic to facts. NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has photographed all six Apollo landing sites in exquisite detail. They’ve also been independently imaged by Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter (India), Kaguya (SELENE) (Japan), and Chang’e 2 (China). Those missions were in proper low lunar orbit, about 50 km above the surface, packed with dedicated narrow-angle cameras built exactly for surface mapping. Artemis II? High-speed flyby at 8,000–10,000 km out, one quick pass, zero orbital insertion, and zero surface-mapping gear on board. Just crew snapping pictures through windows with off-the-shelf cameras. Trying to resolve car-sized hardware from that distance would be like reading license plates from the International Space Station - utterly pointless. More importantly, there was zero mission value in pandering to the denial crowd. NASA designs flights around engineering, science, and crew safety, not around humoring conspiracy theorists who treat evidence like it’s optional. The data already exists. It’s been confirmed, cross-checked, and independently verified by multiple nations for years. And let’s be honest: even if Artemis II had beamed back 8K footage of the lunar modules with little American flags still standing, the same deniers would instantly scream “FAKE!” while furiously refreshing their flat-Earth forums. No one cares what deniers want - they exist for our amusement only. Zombies in clown makeup.
Alex Boge tweet media
English
30
124
757
32K
🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳 retweetledi
Jeremy
Jeremy@ManaByte·
Flat Earthers love demanding “proof of the globe without CGI” like they’ve discovered some unbeatable challenge, but everyone already knows how this goes. It does not matter what anyone shows them. If it is a photo, they scream fake. If it is a video, they scream edited. If it is data, they scream fabricated. If it is an experiment they can do themselves, they suddenly pretend they never asked. You can prove the Earth is a globe without a single image. Circumnavigation does it. Time zones do it. Seasons do it. The way the sky changes as you move does it. The way ships disappear bottom first does it. Long distance flights do it. None of that requires a camera or a pixel. But none of it will ever land with a Flat Earther. They are not looking for evidence. They are looking for something they can immediately dismiss so they can feel like they “won.” You could hand them raw measurements, live observations, or physics they can test in their backyard, and they will still yell “CGI” because that is the only move they have left. When someone decides ahead of time that everything is fake unless it agrees with them, you could put the Earth in their hands and they would still call it edited.
BothSidesAreBought@123ILLState

@ManaByte Prove globe earth without using CGI or edited images. You can’t.

English
122
376
3.9K
141.2K
🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳 retweetledi
Jeremy
Jeremy@ManaByte·
An opinion is liking pineapple on pizza. Saying the Moon landing was faked is not an opinion. It is a claim about reality, and reality comes with receipts. We have video, photos, mission logs, independent tracking from other countries, laser reflectors still sitting on the lunar surface, and astronauts who can explain every step of the mission in technical detail. That is not “your truth.” That is evidence. Calling it an opinion is just the last stage of denial. It is what happens when someone realizes the facts are not on their side and decides to pretend facts are optional. They are not. The Moon landing happened. The evidence is overwhelming. And “I believe otherwise” does not magically turn science into a suggestion. If your argument collapses the moment facts enter the room, it was never an opinion. It was just wrong.
Jaroslav Tavgen🇪🇺@TavgenJaroslav

@LizzardMFK @ManaByte Flat-Earthers also consider their beliefs "facts". You will never reach a consensus on what is a "fact". So everything is an opinion.

English
81
341
2.5K
58.4K
Gustavo Ortiz
Gustavo Ortiz@gugas2014·
@nonat27221 @bbcbrasil Você duvida que um foguete do tamanho de um prédio de mais de 30 andares foi lançado ao espaço há 6 dias?
Português
1
0
0
24
BBC News Brasil
BBC News Brasil@bbcbrasil·
Por que os astronautas da Artemis 2 não pousarão na Lua como nas missões Apolo bbc.in/4t279kS
Português
7
0
8
4.7K
🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳
@nonat27221 @bbcbrasil Vamos lá... Há imagens não apenas da ida, mas de todas as idas. Então, segundo a sua lógica, as imagens foram uma farsa (a não ser que negue também a própria existência de tais imagens). Então por que não fazer uma nova descida falsa agora, para evitar esse tipo de argumento?
Português
0
0
0
9
Nonato Smith
Nonato Smith@nonat27221·
@bbcbrasil Porque esse negócio de que o homem já foi a lua, é mentira! Então nunca existiu! E nunca existirá
Português
2
0
1
126
Mateus Gomes
Mateus Gomes@gomes_mate72895·
@dinotvoffline @Eulavomeucarval Pqp, que mentira absurda kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk. Eliza era um chatbot restrito a área de psicologia e nada além de um emaranhado de "If e elses".
Português
1
0
1
20
Professor Eulavo
Professor Eulavo@Eulavomeucarval·
"Duvido que, 60 anos atrás, com aquela tecnologia, o Homem chegou à Lua". Daqui a pouco a pessoa não vai acreditar que os portugueses chegaram ao Brasil com a tecnologia do seculo XV .
Português
54
67
974
15.6K
Thiago Vilela
Thiago Vilela@ThiagoVilela18·
@fab_ags @Luciano57419964 @peterjordan O mais engraçado é que vocês já definiram, o cara pode não entender de porra nenhuma, não ter a mínima noção sobre o assunto e só acreditar, logo ele não é ignorante pois concorda com a sua visão. Vai pra pqp!!
Português
2
0
0
17
Peter
Peter@peterjordan·
'Apolo 8' (1968) 'Apolo 17' (1972) 'Artemis II' (2026)
Peter tweet media
Lietuvių
421
3.9K
33.1K
718.3K
Tolerando não sei até qdo
Tolerando não sei até qdo@sigotolerando·
@Ramon4lan O que eu acho mais engraçado é a bandeira ficar retinha principalmente na parte de cima, como se uma linha estivesse esticando ela. A parte de baixo até "balança" mas em cima parece que está presa.
Português
5
0
2
3.3K
Arley Davidsom
Arley Davidsom@ArleyDavidsom·
@Ramon4lan anos 70 eles foram lá de boa numa lata de sardinha com um pc que faz um laptop positivo parecer uma mineradora de bitcoin. pousaram, enfincaram bandeira dos EUA, caminharam e cantando. Agora eles vão dar só uma volta porque é complicado descer 🤡
Português
11
2
228
31.5K
Luciano
Luciano@Luciano57419964·
@peterjordan Meu eu não acredito, que jamais o homem pisou na lua...e nunca pisará.... não existe prova alguma, só imagens ilustrativa e teorias
Português
29
0
33
8.4K
Fluminense F.C.
Fluminense F.C.@FluminenseFC·
#DLGxFLU |0-0| ⏰2T - 07' - CANOBBIO RECEBE E FINALIZA, A BOLA DESVIA NO ZAGUEIRO E VAI EM ESCANTEIO!
Português
16
1
59
5.2K
christopher ramos "El Rolo"
@fab_ags @j_crdz16 @fasc1nate Entonces no hables basura en las redes si no tienes pruebas. Eres un zoco que vive engañando a la gente con tus falsas verdades y teorías raras. Andas igual q Buzz Aldrin que le manoteaba a los periodistas que le pedían jurar sobre la biblia que si estuvieron allí. No pudo jurar!
GIF
Español
1
0
0
13
Fascinating
Fascinating@fasc1nate·
Michael Collins passed away on April 28th, 2021. While Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were on the moon, Collins was in the Command Module, orbiting the moon by himself for 28 hours. He is often referred to as the "forgotten" astronaut. While half a billion people on Earth watched as Armstrong took his first steps and uttered his famous words, Collins was on the far side of the moon, cut off from all communication. "I had this beautiful little domain. It was all mine. I was the emperor, the captain of it, and it was quite commodious. I had warm coffee, even." Look at more amazing historical photos: bit.ly/44OpIzi
Fascinating tweet media
English
106
1.6K
29.5K
2.7M
🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳 retweetledi
NASA Artemis
NASA Artemis@NASAArtemis·
Earthset. The Artemis II crew captured this view of an Earthset on April 6, 2026, as they flew around the Moon. The image is reminiscent of the iconic Earthrise image taken by astronaut Bill Anders 58 years earlier as the Apollo 8 crew flew around the Moon.
NASA Artemis tweet media
English
911
26.4K
110.3K
5.2M
Declaration of Memes
Declaration of Memes@LibertyCappy·
Bro WHAT Japan and South Korea first world but Taiwan and Singapore third world? North Korea 2nd world? In what universe is Turkey and Greece 1st world but not Hungary and Czech Republic? Latvia / Estonia 2nd world really? South Africa first world? LOL What an abomination
Declaration of Memes tweet media
English
905
72
2K
527.2K
HydeDagger
HydeDagger@YorckFrederick·
@eimurswheel @fab_ags @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy Disagree. Ageism has merit to point out that old people have their unique naivetes and selfishnesses. Power move? Well, it is what it is. Nothing to enjoy. Maybe we'll see a civilization wiped out today a la Trump. Well, time will tell.
English
1
0
0
24
HydeDagger
HydeDagger@YorckFrederick·
@fab_ags @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy 1, if you’re so concerned about trolls, why use a public space on the Internet? It has always been a place roiled by volatility/hostility. Think 4chan, reddit. 2, T4man said clearly it has nth to do with GDP or std of living, a point which is patently false wrt modernity.
English
3
0
0
27