🇧🇷🇵🇹🇲🇴Fabio Guilherme🇪🇺🇺🇳

My account @Fabme was hacked, someone managed to log in, change my email and phone number and now I can't access it again. That account was created in 2007 and I've never had this problem before. Now I'm trying to recover it and I created this account for this sole purpose.

“Why didn’t Artemis II photograph the Apollo landing sites?” Because there was no reason to. We already have the images - high-resolution, crystal-clear proof sitting right there for anyone who isn’t terminally online and allergic to facts. NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has photographed all six Apollo landing sites in exquisite detail. They’ve also been independently imaged by Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter (India), Kaguya (SELENE) (Japan), and Chang’e 2 (China). Those missions were in proper low lunar orbit, about 50 km above the surface, packed with dedicated narrow-angle cameras built exactly for surface mapping. Artemis II? High-speed flyby at 8,000–10,000 km out, one quick pass, zero orbital insertion, and zero surface-mapping gear on board. Just crew snapping pictures through windows with off-the-shelf cameras. Trying to resolve car-sized hardware from that distance would be like reading license plates from the International Space Station - utterly pointless. More importantly, there was zero mission value in pandering to the denial crowd. NASA designs flights around engineering, science, and crew safety, not around humoring conspiracy theorists who treat evidence like it’s optional. The data already exists. It’s been confirmed, cross-checked, and independently verified by multiple nations for years. And let’s be honest: even if Artemis II had beamed back 8K footage of the lunar modules with little American flags still standing, the same deniers would instantly scream “FAKE!” while furiously refreshing their flat-Earth forums. No one cares what deniers want - they exist for our amusement only. Zombies in clown makeup.

Flat Earthers love demanding “proof of the globe without CGI” like they’ve discovered some unbeatable challenge, but everyone already knows how this goes. It does not matter what anyone shows them. If it is a photo, they scream fake. If it is a video, they scream edited. If it is data, they scream fabricated. If it is an experiment they can do themselves, they suddenly pretend they never asked. You can prove the Earth is a globe without a single image. Circumnavigation does it. Time zones do it. Seasons do it. The way the sky changes as you move does it. The way ships disappear bottom first does it. Long distance flights do it. None of that requires a camera or a pixel. But none of it will ever land with a Flat Earther. They are not looking for evidence. They are looking for something they can immediately dismiss so they can feel like they “won.” You could hand them raw measurements, live observations, or physics they can test in their backyard, and they will still yell “CGI” because that is the only move they have left. When someone decides ahead of time that everything is fake unless it agrees with them, you could put the Earth in their hands and they would still call it edited.

@123ILLState @ManaByte Prove it to you? Of course we can’t. We can’t change a fanatic’s beliefs. And we don’t care. You’re irrelevant, and in any case, you have nothing of value to offer society. You and your lot are just annoying with all that desperate attention-seeking, that’s all.

@ManaByte Prove globe earth without using CGI or edited images. You can’t.

An opinion is liking pineapple on pizza. Saying the Moon landing was faked is not an opinion. It is a claim about reality, and reality comes with receipts. We have video, photos, mission logs, independent tracking from other countries, laser reflectors still sitting on the lunar surface, and astronauts who can explain every step of the mission in technical detail. That is not “your truth.” That is evidence. Calling it an opinion is just the last stage of denial. It is what happens when someone realizes the facts are not on their side and decides to pretend facts are optional. They are not. The Moon landing happened. The evidence is overwhelming. And “I believe otherwise” does not magically turn science into a suggestion. If your argument collapses the moment facts enter the room, it was never an opinion. It was just wrong.

@gugas2014 @nonat27221 @bbcbrasil Ele nem deve saber desses detalhes. Essa modinha de duvidar de algo tão evidente e comprovado não me incomodaria a princípio - essa gente não tem nada a acrescentar à sociedade de qualquer forma -, mas caramba, como são CHATOS. Quaisquer postagem sobre o tema, querem aparecer.

@nonat27221 @bbcbrasil Você duvida que um foguete do tamanho de um prédio de mais de 30 andares foi lançado ao espaço há 6 dias?

Por que os astronautas da Artemis 2 não pousarão na Lua como nas missões Apolo bbc.in/4t279kS

@nonat27221 @bbcbrasil Vamos lá... Há imagens não apenas da ida, mas de todas as idas. Então, segundo a sua lógica, as imagens foram uma farsa (a não ser que negue também a própria existência de tais imagens). Então por que não fazer uma nova descida falsa agora, para evitar esse tipo de argumento?

@bbcbrasil Porque esse negócio de que o homem já foi a lua, é mentira! Então nunca existiu! E nunca existirá

@gomes_mate72895 @dinotvoffline @Eulavomeucarval Eu fiquei abismado com esse argumento dele. Sem falar que a IA da década de 50 era bem diferente da de hoje, pô. Ali eram os primórdios, e feito de forma bem diferente.

@dinotvoffline @Eulavomeucarval Pqp, que mentira absurda kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk. Eliza era um chatbot restrito a área de psicologia e nada além de um emaranhado de "If e elses".

"Duvido que, 60 anos atrás, com aquela tecnologia, o Homem chegou à Lua". Daqui a pouco a pessoa não vai acreditar que os portugueses chegaram ao Brasil com a tecnologia do seculo XV .

@ThiagoVilela18 @Luciano57419964 @peterjordan Por fim, querem ser burros, sejam. Ainda mais vindo de um bolsonarista, não dá para esperar nada de bom ou proveitoso vindo dessa pasta amorfa que tens entre as orelhas. Só tentem ser menos chatos; ninguém está interessado em sua indigência intelectual.

@fab_ags @Luciano57419964 @peterjordan O mais engraçado é que vocês já definiram, o cara pode não entender de porra nenhuma, não ter a mínima noção sobre o assunto e só acreditar, logo ele não é ignorante pois concorda com a sua visão. Vai pra pqp!!

'Apolo 8' (1968) 'Apolo 17' (1972) 'Artemis II' (2026)

@ThiagoVilela18 @Luciano57419964 @peterjordan Em primeiro lugar, você não está falando com a sua mãe, seu moleque. Segundo, obviamente ele não quer entender nada, apenas posar de diferentão e "esclarecido", quando existem milhões de imbecis como vocês 2 que repetem essa mesma ladainha há décadas. Nem originais vocês são...

@andreptorres @Ramon4lan Você meio que respondeu à sua própria pergunta, mas não consegue perceber isso.

@Ramon4lan E pq essa porra balança tanto se nao tem ar no espaço?

A pergunta que fica é: Depois da NASA voltar a Lua e tirar essas fotos, vocês ainda acreditam que o homem pousou na Lua, fez o que fez, com videos sem delay, colocando bandeira americana em solo lunar, tudo isso em 1971 com a Apollo 14?

@sigotolerando @Ramon4lan É porque ela está presa... Isso deveria ser óbvio, e é - apenas não para todo mundo...

@Ramon4lan O que eu acho mais engraçado é a bandeira ficar retinha principalmente na parte de cima, como se uma linha estivesse esticando ela. A parte de baixo até "balança" mas em cima parece que está presa.

@ArleyDavidsom @Ramon4lan Se eles simularam a descida na Lua antes, por que simplesmente não simularam agora, para evitar esse monte de argumentos imbecis?...

@Ramon4lan anos 70 eles foram lá de boa numa lata de sardinha com um pc que faz um laptop positivo parecer uma mineradora de bitcoin. pousaram, enfincaram bandeira dos EUA, caminharam e cantando. Agora eles vão dar só uma volta porque é complicado descer 🤡

@Luciano57419964 @peterjordan E está tudo bem, ninguém liga, e não vai alterar nada da realidade que prefere ignorar. Eu só não entendo por que todos vocês têm TANTA necessidade de exibir sua ignorância tão orgulhosamente em qualquer postagem sobre o tema. Essa necessidade de atenção é até meio deprimente.

@peterjordan Meu eu não acredito, que jamais o homem pisou na lua...e nunca pisará.... não existe prova alguma, só imagens ilustrativa e teorias

@FluminenseFC Handball

#DLGxFLU |0-0| ⏰2T - 07' - CANOBBIO RECEBE E FINALIZA, A BOLA DESVIA NO ZAGUEIRO E VAI EM ESCANTEIO!

@cramos57 @j_crdz16 @fasc1nate Vale, chico. Ahora vuelve a tu habitación y ve a jugar con tus juguetes, y deja en paz a los adultos.

@fab_ags @j_crdz16 @fasc1nate Entonces no hables basura en las redes si no tienes pruebas. Eres un zoco que vive engañando a la gente con tus falsas verdades y teorías raras. Andas igual q Buzz Aldrin que le manoteaba a los periodistas que le pedían jurar sobre la biblia que si estuvieron allí. No pudo jurar!

Michael Collins passed away on April 28th, 2021. While Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were on the moon, Collins was in the Command Module, orbiting the moon by himself for 28 hours. He is often referred to as the "forgotten" astronaut. While half a billion people on Earth watched as Armstrong took his first steps and uttered his famous words, Collins was on the far side of the moon, cut off from all communication. "I had this beautiful little domain. It was all mine. I was the emperor, the captain of it, and it was quite commodious. I had warm coffee, even." Look at more amazing historical photos: bit.ly/44OpIzi

Earthset. The Artemis II crew captured this view of an Earthset on April 6, 2026, as they flew around the Moon. The image is reminiscent of the iconic Earthrise image taken by astronaut Bill Anders 58 years earlier as the Apollo 8 crew flew around the Moon.

@YorckFrederick @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy Thanks for your concern. Now go and play with your toys whilst I stay here and cry over my own stupidity.

@fab_ags @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy Well, must be difficult going through life whilst suffering such congenital stupidity. My condolences.

Bro WHAT Japan and South Korea first world but Taiwan and Singapore third world? North Korea 2nd world? In what universe is Turkey and Greece 1st world but not Hungary and Czech Republic? Latvia / Estonia 2nd world really? South Africa first world? LOL What an abomination

@YorckFrederick @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy That's a very rare and odd usage that I have never seen being used in practice (although I have seen it being mentioned as such). People usually use underdeveloped, developing, and developed nations for that. And you know it...

@fab_ags @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy Emerging and middle income countries.

@YorckFrederick @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy Mate, you’re just an idiot who thinks he’s clever because he’s got a good grasp of the English language. It’s a shame, because you could be more than that. Anyway, enjoy the ride.

@eimurswheel @fab_ags @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy Disagree. Ageism has merit to point out that old people have their unique naivetes and selfishnesses. Power move? Well, it is what it is. Nothing to enjoy. Maybe we'll see a civilization wiped out today a la Trump. Well, time will tell.

@YorckFrederick @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy And still about 2, it shouldn't be so hard for you to figure that it's related to a context in the past. What would be "2nd World" countries in the current context? Can you also see the Soviet Union on that map as well? How can you think it should be viewed as something current?

@fab_ags @eimurswheel @T4man1603 @The_Goat_Here @LibertyCappy 1, if you’re so concerned about trolls, why use a public space on the Internet? It has always been a place roiled by volatility/hostility. Think 4chan, reddit. 2, T4man said clearly it has nth to do with GDP or std of living, a point which is patently false wrt modernity.