facaishu

@WSJ Could you please share your thoughts on Binance’s lawsuit accusing you of publishing false and defamatory reports? Would you be willing to respond with a tweet?

@WSJ Could you please share your thoughts on Binance’s lawsuit accusing you of publishing false and defamatory reports? Would you be willing to respond with a tweet?

Amid all the turmoil in the world, one decidedly positive trend stands out: Crime in the U.S. is way down on.wsj.com/4bcw7rc

@0xCCX @cz_binance @anndylian @heyibinance Fight

@cz_binance @anndylian @heyibinance 华尔街的诽谤言论，看的我真想给他一锤子。表哥看看我昨晚对你的直播总结怎么样？x.com/i/status/20342…

My support for Binance stays strong, but I need to voice out my feedback on Binance Square's Double Standard @heyibinance @cz_binance 1/ Most people know that I am one of the earliest batch on Binance Feed (old name). 2/ I have been contributing to the content for a long time. Mainly long posts nowadays. I will tell you why later. 3/ Recently, my check mark was removed. I was told they need 30K followers and 300k impressions to keep that check mark. - I am ok not to have the check mark. In fact, I have been reinstated once. My concern is: I do not like double standard - I saw many others who have fewer followers still maintaining the check mark - I tried to post news like everyone else, I was told this is spammy. Then what about the rest??? - I was told: "we've granted it to accounts like yours previously but there were alot of backlash / fud from the public". > First of all, it was by invite. I did not request to be on any check mark. > Secondly, you continue to allow the scammers and spammers to post there and are not worried about backlash. So, what backlash is there for long-term support of Binance? 4/ I do not want to touch on other details, e.g., traffic, management, algo favoritism, etc., because this will be beyond what I want to feed back here. I also do not want to get anyone in trouble. 5/ My support for Binance remains the same. My long-form posts will still be on Binance Square. 6/ Thanks for reading.

0xe683a48df543d68ed96d53dd1fda73ccbd144444 #fight 大家割肉吧

@0xCCX @cz_binance Fight

@cz_binance 华尔街的诽谤言论，看的我真想给他一锤子。表哥看看我昨晚对你的直播总结怎么样？x.com/i/status/20342…

Freedom of speech is good. But lack of accountability for false news is not.

@0xCCX @cz_binance Fight

@cz_binance 表哥，看看我对你昨晚的直播总结的怎么样？x.com/i/status/20342…

If you want "false news" all the time, then Dubai is not for you.

@0xCCX Fight

针对华尔街日报（WSJ）的硬核 fight 关于 WSJ 抹黑“资助恐怖主义”的传闻，CZ 给出了强烈回应。没有任何交易所或正经企业会去碰那些灰色领域。逻辑很简单：没收益、没手续费、风险巨大。 这种吃力不讨好的事，只有在媒体的幻想里才会发生。这就是一场基于虚假借口的恶意攻击。在这些媒体眼中，真相不重要，点击率和背后的利益才重要。这就是为什么我们要持续 fight，去守护这个行业的清白。 @cz_binance @heyibinance

@0xCCX 我也不会呀。问到没有

@facaimu 没搞过啊不会弄，来群里问问

刚看完 CZ 的直播。总结一下： 1 🍵 从捡咖啡盖看人品 主持人开场提到一个细节：在风吹掉路人咖啡盖时，CZ 会特意走过去捡起垃圾扔掉。 媒体总想把他塑造成反派，但这种随手的善意骗不了人。在这个充满噪音的圈子里，性格才是最硬的底层协议。 2 🥊 针对华尔街日报（WSJ）的硬核 fight 关于 WSJ 抹黑“资助恐怖主义”的传闻，CZ 给出了强烈回应。没有任何交易所或正经企业会去碰那些灰色领域。逻辑很简单：没收益、没手续费、风险巨大。 这种吃力不讨好的事，只有在媒体的幻想里才会发生。这就是一场基于虚假借口的恶意攻击。在这些媒体眼中，真相不重要，点击率和背后的利益才重要。这就是为什么我们要持续 fight，去守护这个行业的清白。 3 🇺🇸 美国的加密竞争力之战 CZ 谈到美国想成为加密之都，但目前交易费太高、竞争不足。他认为“竞争是最好的消费者保护”。 人才在回流，政策在回暖，但这场关于流动性和定价权的 fight，美国才刚刚开始！ 最后我想问， @cz_binance @heyibinance @nina_rong @_RichardTeng 关于WSJ真相的这场 fight，我们还要打多久？ 🛡️

为币圈而战 0xe683a48df543d68ed96d53dd1fda73ccbd144444

@0xCCX 哥，能更新一下ave资料吗？很多都没进飞机群

@facaimu 重回巅峰

#fight 0xe683A48Df543D68ed96d53Dd1fDa73ccbd144444 我们应该为整个加密货币行业而战，而不仅仅是为某个项目。@heyibinance 和 @binance 展现了勇敢的精神，我们敬佩这种精神 t.me/ccxchatgroup

社区已经建好，fight重回巅峰 #fight 0xe683a48df543d68ed96d53dd1fda73ccbd144444 t.me/ccxchatgroup

@MakiMirro95394 t.me/ccxchatgroup进群，有事情和你商量，能不能把你的fight筹码分散一下

@xiaoyibtc 小易，能不能把你fight的筹码分散一下

好的 我听你们劝 把书和龙虾进行减仓到百分之一 别在骂我压车了 我也不建设了 我也去掏 我并不是没有p的本领 只是我懒得玩 这个流动性 更多时间花在了股票上。

@aa_AFeng t.me/ccxchatgroup阿峰进群，组织需要你

@ytflzyyds t.me/ccxchatgroup

@xiaoyibtc t.me/ccxchatgroup

@xiaoyibtc t.me/ccxchatgroup小易，回家啦

虽然我知道会和巴黎 一样 但是我也选择了 🤣 你们玩吧 开心就好 🤣 继续匿名玩 meme 大部分时间依旧股票。

@ZhangZToooooo t.me/ccxchatgroup

@GoldenCicada t.me/ccxchatgroup回家啦