بدون مخلل🥒🧋

3.8K posts

بدون مخلل🥒🧋 banner
بدون مخلل🥒🧋

بدون مخلل🥒🧋

@falafelmalaffa

Studying the history of the Middle East//中文/فارسی/العربية/English/Español/Français

Katılım Mayıs 2018
1.2K Takip Edilen169 Takipçiler
بدون مخلل🥒🧋 retweetledi
Timur Kuran
Timur Kuran@timurkuran·
Erdoğan spoke with Trump on May 20. The very next day, he ramped up efforts to solidify his dictatorship. Now the two are exchanging grotesquely absurd praise. This bonding is disastrous for Turkey, the US, and the world.
Timur Kuran tweet media
English
12
114
415
14.9K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋
بدون مخلل🥒🧋@falafelmalaffa·
@babyfolio Bigger names like $unh $cnc are doing well too… there are reasons to be bullish on the entire sector before the mid-term at least
English
0
0
1
19
Babyfolio
Babyfolio@babyfolio·
I don’t get why people insist on fighting the trend by loading up on SaaS / Healthcare / Fintech. I see so many still posting about them. Not saying those sectors can’t work. There are definitely quality SaaS names that are unjustifiably beaten down, I’m just not interested in trying to catch them here. I want strong sector momentum behind my investments, and right now these sectors simply don’t have it. Retail favorites like $SOFI and $ZETA are still down YTD, and some of these names have been dead money for years despite all the hype. Trust me, I know the pain personally too. (Thanks $TSLA.) Could they eventually do well? Absolutely. But if you’re looking for outsized returns, weak sector sentiment is usually not where the biggest winners come from. My opinion: It’s completely okay to sell a stock even if you still believe in the company. Opportunity cost is REAL, and sitting in dead money while other sectors run can hurt more than taking the loss.
English
35
2
113
4.7K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋 retweetledi
ian bremmer
ian bremmer@ianbremmer·
if concluded, trump-iran deal arguably the least worst outcome available to president trump. except for: 1) agreeing to those terms months ago. 2) not having gone to war in the first place. or 3) not having withdrawn from the iranian nuclear deal.
English
90
240
1.2K
56.7K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋 retweetledi
Aelia Capitolina
Aelia Capitolina@Areskapitalon·
翻译过来就是:既然只要主动多放船过去就是“逐渐开放”,那么伊朗就能继续保持其海峡控制权,只用放船来换取美国放松海上封锁。 而核武器问题不需要马上解决,因为核武器问题是和解除经济制裁挂钩的,可以“逐步解决”,只要承诺继续谈判就好。也就是不再与海上封锁挂钩。 大概就是默认了霍尔木兹海峡是伊朗地盘的前提之下,对等放开海上封锁,然后再进行旷日持久的核协议谈判来换取解除制裁,那么伊朗当然也可以不作出让步,一直拖下去就可以了。 这件事应该就是随着美国的彻底让步而解决了。
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

BREAKING: The US and Iran are closing in on a deal that would extend their ceasefire by 60 days and lay the framework for discussions on Iran's nuclear program, mediators say. Details include: 1. This would include a "gradual reopening" of the Strait of Hormuz 2. It would also include a commitment to discussing the "diluting or handing over" of Iran's highly enrich uranium 3. The US would ease its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and agree to sanctions relief 4. The US would also begin a phased unfreezing of Iran's assets Both sides are nearing a "memorandum of understanding" to extend a ceasefire.

中文
13
3
17
14.3K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋 retweetledi
Aelia Capitolina
Aelia Capitolina@Areskapitalon·
沃什说的没有什么错,AI理论上的确是会造成通缩效应,它会同时通过增加供给/通过裁员打压需求。然而,这并不意味着有了AI就可以通缩,因为头痛医头脚痛医脚并不能真的把一个生了病的人医好。 因为供给不足和需求过剩是美国在上个年代的全球民族国家套利体系中扮演的角色的自然延伸。如果整个体系运转良好,其实根本不会存在供给不足和需求过剩的结果。之前几十年,为什么没有人担心通胀问题呢? 根本原因是,全球民族国家套利体系正在崩溃。它在美国以通胀与购买力滑坡的方式崩溃,在中国以通缩与失业的方式崩溃,在日本以汇率套利难以为继的方式崩溃,在英国以政策套利难以为继的方式崩溃,在中东则以战争的方式崩溃。 这同一场病导致的症状有很多,比如现在的伊朗战争,就是同一场病在另一个地区的另一个症状。然而,人们看待这场病的视角仍然被民族国家的国界所局限。AI只是针对其中局限于美国自身的一个症状下药,试图把整个病治好,显然是一点也不现实的。 现在的AI,炒作的就是这么一个局限的现实:它能在美国解决掉属于美国的症状。但伊朗战争是中东的症状,它解决不了,而这个症状如果解决不了,美国的症状同样解决不了。周五Waller的讲话很明显表示了,在不结束伊朗战争的前提下只靠AI就能造成通缩就是一个幻想。
松林人家@Rusong_Machunbo

沃什说,人工智能会导致通缩效应,明显是在扯淡,为特朗普(降息)服务。 人工智能与工业革命没什么不同,都是机器代替人的过程。智能机器取代人,无疑会导致对能源、能源金属需求额外的暴增,这会推高通胀,美国人的电费单上已经体现了出来。 智能机器取代人,会导致需求萎缩。 滞胀的结局。

中文
2
3
20
13.3K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋
بدون مخلل🥒🧋@falafelmalaffa·
@tradergokux 我观点相反:觉得如果纯正股操作,不加融资,应该专注小盘股。(前提是:体量还没到巨🐳级别,流动性暂时可以不考虑😅)。小盘股风险大但好处是爆发潜力大,一旦市值被重估动不动翻好几倍。mag 7 没期权的话 短期很难翻倍,英特尔这种一年翻五倍的情况是极少见的。
中文
2
0
0
130
TraderGoku
TraderGoku@tradergokux·
当我纠结于同一个板块里几只技术面都很好的股票该买哪一只时,我通常会选择市值最大、流动性最好的那只。 因为它允许我上更大的仓位,也更容易进出。 仓位决定收益。 $ARM $AMD $INTC
中文
5
5
53
5.9K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋
بدون مخلل🥒🧋@falafelmalaffa·
@WealthyReadings When I reflected my recent trading record, I indeed identified selling too early as the biggest contributor to my underperformance. For me, the root cause of selling too early is almost always the same: a lack of conviction— or underestimation of its potential upside.
English
1
0
1
24
The Few Bets That Matter
The Few Bets That Matter@WealthyReadings·
Failed trades aren't failure. They are data. There is always something done wrong in a failed trade. You bought too late or sold too early, listened to the wrong data or interpreted it wrongly. When I closed $NBIS too early, I didn't close myself up and cry. I learned that my personal bias shouldn't be enough, by itself, to close a position against my system. I do not close positions that meet my system anymore. When I bought $DUOL in July because I believed the app had a bright future, I didn't understand the market's perception of SaaS and its potential shrinking cash generation. I do not go against the market anymore. When I reduced both $RKLB and $LUNR positions because of a "potential weakness" while both swings were still within my plan, I didn't reduce risk. I cut wins. Both combined would have returned a 15% net worth increase, but didn't. I do not touch my swings as long as they fit the plan anymore. I made many mistakes over the last two years but each mistake allowed me to improve my system. I analyzed what I did wrong, I looked at the data of those failures instead of crying about missed gains. There are no ceilings in the markets for someone willing to learn.
The Few Bets That Matter@WealthyReadings

I made three costly mistakes this year. All due to overthinking and personal bias. I did not respect my systems, or the market, and it cost me greatly. I'd estimate them to have cost me ~25% in YTD performance. Not a small miss. Writing this helps me pinpoint the issue, identifying where and why things went wrong, and crystallizes the moment. This is how I learn, how I improve, how I ensure not to reproduce these mistakes in the second half of the year. I already talked about my first mistake, but today is a great day to revisit it after a banger quarter and a new ATH. $NBIS would now be a 7-bagger from my ealier average and a 9.5-bagger from my lowest purchase. I no longer own the name. I sold my position in February ~$85. I had the bias that declining margins from hyperscalers and increased CapEx would trigger more selling while the tech market was bearish. x.com/WealthyReading… I was wrong, but that wasn’t my mistake. My mistake was to believe my bias to be more valuable than my system. If I had followed it, I would still be holding and sitting on ~750% return from my early 2025 purchases. Sure, I realized my mistake, bought back at ~$110, and sold at ~$140 to concentrate on $SOI - which turned out to be a great move. x.com/WealthyReading… But breaking the system wasn't and the liquidity to buy $SOI should have come from other names - one we'll talk baout in my third mistake. That was lesson one. I haven’t broken my system on any core position since. I hold a thesis and price action; as long as neither breaks, I hold my stock. The involved both $LUNR and $RKLB. I wrote a clear, detailed write-up on both explaining why I was buying them, justifying the obvious bull market in space, and why those two would be winners. The plan was clear from thesis to execution. Since these positions were bought at a high valuation, they came with a stop loss to protect my capital - which was on margin. But last week, after $FLY and $BKSY earnings and the red reactions, I decided to reduce my position in both as they were trading ~2% above my stop loss around my entry price. My plan was crystal clear and the risk was controlled. But I chose to reduce it because... something "seemed" wrong? I am not even sure why. Nevertheless, I did. $RKLB went on to trigger my profit-taking order at $99, and $LUNR is still running, now up 50% since entry. What should have been two 40%+ trades turned out to be less than hald of it, for no reason. I had a trading plan. Controlled risk. And I chose to not trust myself. That was lesson two. $TMDX has been the most important lesson for this year. I said I closed $NBIS to buy $SOI, that was as I refused to close $TMDX despites no performance, no volume, no narrative. I closed a winner to hold a favorite. Closing this position was harder to me than closing a winner with tailwinds and perfect execution. The stock turned out to be a loser and fell a sharp 45% since I closed my position. But I should have closed it sooner. If a stock doesn't respect your buying condictions anymore, you have no reasons to hold it. Markets are too unforgiving to waste capital on a name outside of your system, just because you like it. That was lesson three. The problem with those three lessons is that fixing them is pretty hard, for a simple reason. They are all psychological. The first was about fear, the second was about doubt and the third was about attachement. The only way to get rid of them is either to print in your brain that the feeling of losing is worst that the feeling of selling a name you love or holding a name you doubt on despites you clear plan. Or to build systems. Hacks that will force you not to overthink a position or hold onto it too long. Automations or actions to avoid being in this situation. I will have to think more about the solutions, but the mistakes and symptoms are clear; that is already a massive step to improving. Our investing is only as good as our poorest decision.

English
3
0
14
2.5K
The Few Bets That Matter
The Few Bets That Matter@WealthyReadings·
🚨 I am starting a $10,000 challenge. The rules are simple: - Only stocks that meet my system - All in, one asset at a time - Everything documented publicly This isn't just another $10K to $100K challenge. This is a learning opportunity, for you and me. Real trades, real money, real account. I don't intend to stop this challenge, the positions will constantly be reinvested until undeniable success or failure, with diagnostics. The purpose is to document everything and share the importance of stock picking, position sizing, risk management and investing systems. This will teach plenty about FOMO, planning, picking, frustration... Not another "buying this today, selling tomorrow." A detailed process, shared publicly. A roadmap to making mistakes and improving.
The Few Bets That Matter tweet media
English
8
0
28
1.8K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋
بدون مخلل🥒🧋@falafelmalaffa·
@labubu_trader Indeed, the oil will finally become investible again in the sense that its price action will no longer be dictated by AXIOS as much as it has been since the beginning of this war. As a believer of 🌮, I have been patiently waiting for this dip. 😄
English
0
0
1
144
3X Long Labubu
3X Long Labubu@labubu_trader·
To the oil bulls, actually a peace deal can eliminate the uncertainty and they can fairly price the oil based on supply demand structure. The current price is undervalued.
English
3
1
28
4.8K
3X Long Labubu
3X Long Labubu@labubu_trader·
Yes I’m still very bullish on SPX and SMH for the whole year. But I think in the next 1-2 weeks, SPX will form a bull trap. The reason is simple: The straits wouldn’t reopen as fast as the market expected. Also June’s 1st half has so many macro events which would cause big uncertainty. I would reduce my leverage and exposure in beta during this bull trap and buying any dips in June’s 1st half. Also if short end CL/BRN has a huge dip, I will buy it and also long XLE/OIH/XES.
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter

BREAKING: The US and Iran are closing in on a deal that would extend their ceasefire by 60 days and lay the framework for discussions on Iran's nuclear program, mediators say. Details include: 1. This would include a "gradual reopening" of the Strait of Hormuz 2. It would also include a commitment to discussing the "diluting or handing over" of Iran's highly enrich uranium 3. The US would ease its blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and agree to sanctions relief 4. The US would also begin a phased unfreezing of Iran's assets Both sides are nearing a "memorandum of understanding" to extend a ceasefire.

English
17
20
296
70K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋
بدون مخلل🥒🧋@falafelmalaffa·
@tradergokux 在股市又新高之际,个人比较倾向买些已经回踩21ema但依然在强势周期的票,如 $nvda $amkr
中文
0
0
1
85
Balder
Balder@Balder13946731·
目前已经确认的下一任 $INTC $IBM $DELL
中文
22
15
192
51.5K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋 retweetledi
اتاق خبر منوتو
اطلاعیه منوتو درباره پایان پخش برنامه‌ها بینندگان و همراهان تلویزیون منو‌تو، به اطلاع مخاطبان گرامی می‌رسانیم که پس از مدت‌ها تامل و ارزیابی، سرانجام به این تصمیم دشوار رسیده‌ایم که به پخش برنامه‌های منوتو پایان دهیم. آخرین پخش ما از ماهواره و یوتیوب، شامگاه ۲۴ مه ۲۰۲۶ (۳ خرداد ۱۴۰۵) خواهد بود. منوتو از نخستین روز، تنها یک شبکه تلویزیونی نبود، تلاشی بود برای ساختن فضایی مستقل، صادقانه و آزاد، جایی برای گفت‌وگوی باز، اندیشیدن، بازتاب دادن دغدغه‌ها، روایت‌ها و شنیدن صدای مردم ایران. اما امروز، فراتر از محدودیت‌های مالی و فشار بر منابع که پیش‌تر درباره آن گفته‌ایم، چشم‌انداز رسانه‌ای به‌طور بنیادین دگرگون شده است. رسانه‌های نوین و شبکه‌های اجتماعی، توجه مخاطبان را پراکنده کرده و مفهوم رسانه و پخش سنتی را تغییر داده‌اند. هم‌زمان، فضای عمومی بیش از هر زمان دیگری با اطلاعات نادرست، هیجان‌سازی و تلاش آگاهانه برای مخدوش کردن مرز میان واقعیت و روایت‌های جعلی تعریف می‌شود، فضایی که ادامه فعالیت حرفه‌ای، مستقل و اصولی را دشوارتر از همیشه کرده است. در کنار این تحولات، فضای سیاسی ایران هم روزبه‌روز خصمانه‌تر و قطبی‌تر شده است. هر بحث، هر تصمیم و هر تلاش صادقانه برای حفظ توازن، انصاف و استقلال حرفه‌ای، از هر سو با حمله و فشار مواجه می‌شود. مجموعه این شرایط ما را به این تصمیم رساند که در چنین فضا و تحت چنین شرایطی، ادامه فعالیت ممکن نیست. ادامه دادن به شکلی که همچنان با اصول و ارزش‌های اولیه منوتو همخوان باشد، روزبه‌روز دشوارتر شده است. از همین رو، ترجیح دادیم به جای ادامه مسیری که ممکن است به بهای از دست رفتن هویت منوتو تمام شود، از ارزش و انسجام این مجموعه محافظت کرده و خود را برای شکلی متفاوت از تاثیرگذاری آماده کنیم. این تصمیم به معنای عقب‌نشینی یا پایان نیست. این یک مکث است، توقفی برای حفظ ارزش‌هایی که منوتو را برای ما و بسیاری از مخاطبانش معنادار کرد. ما پخش منوتو را متوقف می‌کنیم تا بتوانیم در آینده، به شکلی دیگر، در گفت‌وگو درباره فردای ایران سهیم شویم. تا آن روز، با هر امکانی که در اختیار داشته باشیم، تعهد ما به ایران، مردم ایران و آینده‌ای که شایسته آن هستیم، تغییری نخواهد کرد. تعهدی که فراتر از هر آنتن، استودیو یا پخش زنده است. ما از شما، مخاطبان منوتو، سپاسگزاریم که در تمام این سال‌ها ما را به خانه‌های خود راه دادید و به ما اعتماد کردید. هر روز، از گوشه‌وکنار ایران و جهان، تماس‌ها، پیام‌ها و گزارش‌های بی‌شماری از شما دریافت کردیم، از مردمی که در دشوارترین شرایط، روایت‌ها و صدای خود را با ما در میان گذاشتند. منوتو بدون این ارتباط، بدون این اعتماد و بدون گفت‌وگو با شما، هرگز معنایی نداشت. هم‌زمان، ما باور داریم که فعالیت و اثرگذاری تنها به رسانه سنتی محدود نمی‌شود و عرصه‌های مهم دیگری هم پیش روست که تیم منوتو می‌تواند در آن‌ها نقشی مؤثر و سازنده ایفا کند. تمامی اشتراک‌ها و عضویت‌ها در تاریخ ۲۴ مه ۲۰۲۶ (۳ خرداد ۱۴۰۵) به پایان خواهد رسید. در پایان، از همه کسانی که در این مسیر همراه ما بوده‌اند، صمیمانه سپاسگزاریم. اعتماد و حمایت همیشگی و وفاداری شما برای ما ارزشی فراتر از آنچه در کلمات بگنجد داشته است و امید داریم در مسیرهای تازه‌ای که پیش رو داریم همچنان همراه ما بمانید. پاینده ایران کیوان و مرجان عباسی
فارسی
1.5K
146
1.7K
1.2M
بدون مخلل🥒🧋
بدون مخلل🥒🧋@falafelmalaffa·
@Kai866 这种 杀敌八百,自损一万 的损招。证监会这只手天天管东管西刷存在感,以后更不会有人玩港股 大a了。
中文
0
0
1
204
The Few Bets That Matter
The Few Bets That Matter@WealthyReadings·
I have ~60% of my portfolio in energy. This is the biggest pain point not just for AI but for the world, whether the need is to power GPUs or households. These positions are both defensive and offensive. Best liquidity attribution right now. Invested across the entire battery chain from $SGML to $FLNC passing by $SEDG.
zerohedge@zerohedge

Everyone is focusing on the soaring memory cost in the Vera Rubin rack. Here is the real shocker. US power grid can barely keep up with the current setup.

English
4
3
39
8.4K
بدون مخلل🥒🧋 retweetledi
摩卡星冰乐
摩卡星冰乐@Franktradinglog·
那是遥远的2020年,我才刚刚进入股市。初出茅庐还仍旧相信价值投资的我立刻买入了我最看好的公司,腾讯和阿里巴巴。 那时候我觉得自己看得懂未来。十亿用户、护城河、印钞机一样的现金流,教科书里所有的好生意它们全占了。我甚至有点心疼那些不敢买的人,这么好的东西,怎么会有人不买呢? 然后2021来了。 那时候我在某机构实习,蚂蚁上市被叫停那一晚,我就坐在屏幕前眼睁睁看着。紧接着是教培,7月24号一晚普跌七八十个点,整个行业被一纸文件打死。我们当时还觉得自己挺聪明,在好未来PB不到1的时候抄底,心想这总该是地板了吧。结果后面又跌了50%。地板下面,还有地下室。 后来我才慢慢咂摸出巴菲特那句话的意思,不要碰命运掌握在政策手里的生意。再便宜的估值,在一纸文件面前都不算什么安全边际,因为决定它生死的压根不是资产负债表,是别人的一句话。 那一年我学到的东西,比我之前看的所有书加起来都多。便宜,是有原因的。这句话我是用真金白银,外加一整年的实习工资,换来的。 五年过去,今天证监会联合八部门把老虎、富途、长桥一锅端了。没收全部违法所得,两年过渡期内存量只能卖出转出、不许买入不许入金,到期彻底关停。 又是熟悉的配方。昨天还合规运营、好好开着户的生意,今天就成了非法跨境展业。规则总是事后才写清楚,账却是当场就要结的。 所以我一直跟身边的朋友讲,为什么中概股是垃圾,为什么新兴市场的股票永远带着一层折价。不是公司不赚钱,很多公司赚钱赚得凶得很。是因为"规则会不会改变"这件事根本没人能给它定价。在一个朝令夕改、政策又不透明的地方,你买的从来不只是一家公司的现金流,你还顺手揣了一份自己根本对冲不掉的政治风险进兜里。人家成熟市场肯为"看得明白"多付钱,那轮到这边,为"看不明白"打个折,不是天经地义吗。 这个折价不会消失的,因为造出它的那个东西,从头到尾就没变过。 便宜,是有原因的。
中文
83
91
562
111.6K