Fayaz

643 posts

Fayaz banner
Fayaz

Fayaz

@fayazdeen

USA Katılım Kasım 2009
226 Takip Edilen177 Takipçiler
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@hamids They came up with very accurate number instead of just saying 5000+ launches to make it sound very well calculated
English
1
0
0
116
Hamid
Hamid@hamids·
In the last 8 years, $SPCX’s Starship has gone from 0 launches per year to 0 launches per year, despite expectations set by Elon that it would take humans to Mars by 2022, at the latest. So going from 0 launches today to 5,000+ in 5 years might be a little bit of a stretch. Just a little bit. This is why I don’t put any weight into any analyst expectations. They all just seem delusional to me. Either too positive or too negative. I could see Starship reaching a couple hundred launches per year in 5 years, which would be absolutely amazing!
Shay Boloor@StockSavvyShay

Goldman Sachs expects $SPCX Starship AI missions to reach 5,288 by 2031 with each carrying 30–50 satellites powered by one GB300-equivalent rack apiece. That could mean millions of accelerators from $NVDA, fabricated by $TSM with $MU & $SKHY supplying the HBM behind each rack.

English
15
0
35
11.3K
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸@EthanLevins2·
BREAKING: The Pentagon has released the CLEAREST footage yet of a UFO. Footage from 2020.
English
344
65
663
73K
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@davevermilion Meta is releasing/leaking good news, maybe a bond sale or dilution is coming next
English
0
0
1
78
David Nicoski CMT
David Nicoski CMT@davevermilion·
The cheerleaders cheer but it does not change the fact that META is down 29% over the past year. I mentioned on the George Noble call that most of the mag 7 were buys. Things that get oversold can get good bounces. That is what we are experiencing. Market near new highs and META was down almost 35% over the last 12 months. Chase it higher.
CK Capital@CKCapitalxx

And people panicked when this first came up, thinking $META had too much compute and was dumping the excess. The offers to rent Meta's compute are so high it might beat using it internally. That's demand so intense that renting it out prints more money than running your own models on it. If that's true for Meta, it's the entire thesis for the neoclouds, companies whose whole business is renting out compute. Mark just told you how valuable that capacity is. He sees it. That's why he wants in. The dip was the gift.

English
2
0
19
4.6K
David Nicoski CMT
David Nicoski CMT@davevermilion·
My guess is the U.S. calls a truce with Iran after bombing them. We have ended 37 wars this year, we can do it again.
English
8
4
75
5.9K
JaguarAnalytics
JaguarAnalytics@JaguarAnalytics·
Friendly reminder: I'm your favorite perma-bear.
English
24
0
69
9.9K
Evan
Evan@StockMKTNewz·
SpaceX $SPCX got 15 new buy ratings from analysts today: Goldman Sachs today initiated coverage on SpaceX stock with a Buy rating and a $205 price target Citi initiated coverage on SpaceX stock with a Buy rating and a $200 price target Morgan Stanley initiated coverage on SpaceX stock with a Buy rating and a $300 price target BofA initiated coverage on SpaceX stock with a Buy rating and a $235 price target Wells Fargo initiated coverage on SpaceX stock with a Buy rating and a $230 price target JPMorgan initiated coverage on SpaceX stock with a Buy rating and a $225 price target
Evan tweet media
TipRanks@TipRanks

🔥SpaceX $SPCX just emerged from its 25-day IPO quiet period – and Wall Street wasted no time. 15 firms initiated coverage, all with Buy ratings, with price targets ranging from $190 to a Street-high $300 from Morgan Stanley. The broad takeaway: analysts see continued upside driven by SpaceX's leadership in launch services, Starlink's growth, and the company's expanding role in the global space economy.

English
83
136
706
134.6K
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@Sam_Badawi It will have 22% more battery life and 18% thinner
English
0
0
0
43
Karl Mehta
Karl Mehta@karlmehta·
Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Alphabet, was asked point blank if AI is a bubble. He didn't dodge. He said yes -- partly -- and that not even Google gets out clean: "You see real demand, and we are constrained in our ability to serve that demand." "When we go through these investment cycles, there are moments we overshoot -- collectively, as an industry." "We can look back at the internet: there was clearly a lot of excess investment." "It's both rational, and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this." "No company is going to be immune, including us. If you overinvest, we'll have to work through that phase." The tell isn't that he admitted the irrationality. It's that the man sitting on the most compute on earth is already pricing in the overshoot -- while telling you the demand underneath it is real. A bubble and a revolution were never mutually exclusive. The internet was both.
English
59
140
1K
408.5K
Sam Badawi
Sam Badawi@Sam_Badawi·
Michael Burry is pushing back on Elon Musk’s timeline for AI and robots making work optional. Musk says AI + robots lead to universal high income. Burry’s response: not before a revolution comes first.
Sam Badawi tweet media
English
26
3
52
11.1K
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@zerohedge They have a system that hacks everything and chinese hack their’s.
English
0
0
0
73
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@ParrotCapital This is like NFT. If this is a real leather then it might be worth $400
English
0
0
0
6
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@hamids Making us believe their analysis is accurate
English
0
0
0
114
Hamid
Hamid@hamids·
How full of yourself do you have to be to think that you need to adjust your price target by $2 from $765 -> $767 as this Wells Fargo analyst, Ken Gawrelski, just did for $META? 🤣
Hamid tweet media
English
12
0
58
9.8K
amit
amit@amitisinvesting·
OPENAI CONSIDERING GIVING US GOVERNMENT A 5% STAKE IN THE COMPANY. Okay, this is bullish if you now assume that the government will be very incentivized to make sure AI doesn’t fail… This is bearish if you assume that OpenAI is having some serious issues and now the US gov will have to hold the bag when things don’t work out. I think one point of logic here for the Trump admin is that if 50% of GDP growth is capex and OpenAI has $1.4T of spending commitments, then OpenAI is a big part of all that capex leading to more GDP growth so maybe the Trump admin wants a stake to ensure that trillions continue to be spent on datacenters and OpenAI doesn’t fail. If they fail, no capex which means no GDP growth. Also, what does this mean for Anthropic? Would they want their biggest competitor to be this close to the US gov? Would they consider giving 5% for ensuring that they will also have a final resort for financial support? Many more questions than answers if this becomes real now…
amit tweet media
English
122
55
828
154.2K
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@StockSavvyShay Earlier he said Universal Basic Income, now High income.
English
4
0
3
397
Shay Boloor
Shay Boloor@StockSavvyShay·
Elon Musk says AI and robots will be able to do everything, making work optional and enabling “universal high income.”
Shay Boloor tweet mediaShay Boloor tweet media
English
115
57
524
103.3K
Fayaz
Fayaz@fayazdeen·
@zerohedge which means they don’t know what to do with all those chips and servers. This is the sign
English
0
0
0
68
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
*META IS BUILDING A CLOUD BUSINESS TO SELL EXCESS AI COMPUTE First SpaceX, now Meta selling something called "excess compute"
English
152
197
2.5K
1.3M
Valuetainment
Valuetainment@valuetainment·
NEW: Meta employees consumed 73.7 trillion AI tokens in a single month. Which costs roughly $221 million a month and around $2.65 billion a year.
Valuetainment tweet mediaValuetainment tweet media
English
404
607
8.6K
5.2M