fdgy

2.4K posts

fdgy banner
fdgy

fdgy

@fdgy

“That which can be destroyed by truth...should be”

New York, USA Katılım Mart 2009
75 Takip Edilen157 Takipçiler
fdgy retweetledi
Jameson Lopp
Jameson Lopp@lopp·
You can just do things. Or you can cry about others doing things.
English
9
9
60
4.3K
fdgy
fdgy@fdgy·
@winhelpwin @rockkdev I know that hosting your own email server introduces other vulnerabilities…but for this specific attack vector, would the attack be successful if your email was self hosted? Is this just a GMail vulnerability?
English
1
0
0
1K
winhelpwin
winhelpwin@winhelpwin·
@rockkdev Sorry if this is a dumb question but can you elaborate what (1) means? If my email is warriorsFan[at]gmail[dot]com what would the “Gmail dot trick…” be?
English
12
0
19
71.1K
Abdel
Abdel@rockkdev·
New Robinhood phishing chain that's kinda beautiful: 1. Attacker creates an RH account using the Gmail dot trick of your email (same inbox, different address) 2. Sets device name to HTML 3. RH's "unrecognized activity" email renders the device name unsanitized (html injection) The result is a real email from noreply@robinhood.com, DKIM pass, SPF pass, DMARC pass, with a phishing CTA Just because it's real, doesn't mean it's safe... $HOOD
Abdel tweet mediaAbdel tweet mediaAbdel tweet media
English
177
369
3.8K
3M
fdgy
fdgy@fdgy·
JFC…. However high your bar is for clicking links in emails…it should be much higher. Unless there is literally no other way to independently navigate to where you believe that link should take you and you are 1,000% sure it is legit…don’t do it. If you are not techy enough to make sense of a long URL…copy it and paste it into your preferred LLM to ask its opinion before you click.
GIF
Abdel@rockkdev

New Robinhood phishing chain that's kinda beautiful: 1. Attacker creates an RH account using the Gmail dot trick of your email (same inbox, different address) 2. Sets device name to HTML 3. RH's "unrecognized activity" email renders the device name unsanitized (html injection) The result is a real email from noreply@robinhood.com, DKIM pass, SPF pass, DMARC pass, with a phishing CTA Just because it's real, doesn't mean it's safe... $HOOD

English
0
0
0
1.3K
fdgy retweetledi
Bridget Phetasy
Bridget Phetasy@BridgetPhetasy·
The idea that "the Pope isn't political" is one of the funniest things you can say if you know literally anything about history.
English
130
492
5.4K
64.6K
Epic Maps 🗺️
Epic Maps 🗺️@theepicmap·
🍆 The 20 cities having the most sex 1. 🇲🇴 Macau 2. 🇵🇱 Krakow 3. 🇲🇽 Guadalajara 4. 🇧🇷 Sao Paulo 5. 🇱🇺 Luxembourg 6. 🇵🇹 Porto 7. 🇫🇷 Marseille 8. 🇹🇭 Bangkok 9. 🇧🇷 Rio de Janeiro 10. 🇵🇦 Panama City 11. 🇬🇧 Cambridge 12. 🇮🇹 Naples 13. 🇨🇴 Medellin 14. 🇧🇪 Brussels 15. 🇻🇳 Hanoi 16. 🇨🇴 Bogota 17. 🇲🇽 Mexico City 18. 🇳🇱 Rotterdam 19. 🇧🇷 Brasilia 20. 🇨🇷 San Jose Source: TimeOut
29
18
417
96.3K
fdgy
fdgy@fdgy·
11/11 🏁 The deepest through line may be this: These are mostly cities where social energy is public, repeated, mixed, and low-friction. Not necessarily the richest. Not necessarily the safest. Not necessarily the most prestigious. Not necessarily the most sexually liberal in ideology. But cities where: •people encounter each other often •strangers mixing is normal •nighttime is active •outsiders are common •status barriers are not airtight •flirtation is culturally legible That combination is rarer than it looks.
English
0
0
0
13
fdgy
fdgy@fdgy·
10/11 Tenth, there is a strong presence of student or youth-heavy ecosystems. Cambridge is obvious, Kraków as well, Medellín to a degree, Guadalajara too. Younger populations and student churn create networks that are faster-moving, less settled, and more experimental.
English
1
0
0
14
fdgy
fdgy@fdgy·
🧵 1/11 ❓Prompt: What non-obvious characteristics or through lines do these cities have. 🤖 Response: These cities tend to be cosmopolitan mixing chambers with strong public social life, high visitor/student/outsider churn, and cultures where flirtation is easier to express in ordinary life. A few non-obvious through lines jump out. First, this is not really a list of the world’s biggest or richest cities. It skews toward places that are socially dense without being maximally formal. You do not see many of the obvious global command centers like New York, Tokyo, Singapore, Frankfurt, or Zurich. That suggests the underlying signal is probably not raw wealth, nor sheer population, nor even tourism alone. It looks more like a mix of street life, nightlife, dating fluidity, compactness, and lower social frictioellín both appearing: suggests Colombia is being picked up as an overall strong signal in the source culture, not just one standout city.
Epic Maps 🗺️@theepicmap

🍆 The 20 cities having the most sex 1. 🇲🇴 Macau 2. 🇵🇱 Krakow 3. 🇲🇽 Guadalajara 4. 🇧🇷 Sao Paulo 5. 🇱🇺 Luxembourg 6. 🇵🇹 Porto 7. 🇫🇷 Marseille 8. 🇹🇭 Bangkok 9. 🇧🇷 Rio de Janeiro 10. 🇵🇦 Panama City 11. 🇬🇧 Cambridge 12. 🇮🇹 Naples 13. 🇨🇴 Medellin 14. 🇧🇪 Brussels 15. 🇻🇳 Hanoi 16. 🇨🇴 Bogota 17. 🇲🇽 Mexico City 18. 🇳🇱 Rotterdam 19. 🇧🇷 Brasilia 20. 🇨🇷 San Jose Source: TimeOut

English
1
0
0
804
fdgy retweetledi
Chris Williamson
Chris Williamson@ChrisWillx·
Marry the person you can go to war with. “Don’t marry the person you can have fun with. Marry the person you can suffer with. Anyone can love you when life is good. When everything’s easy. When the money’s flowing and the smiles come naturally. That part is simple. That’s not the test. Love isn’t proven on the best days. It’s revealed on the worst ones. When life hits hard. When everything feels uncertain. When the future looks terrifying and you don’t know what comes next. That’s when you find out who’s really there.” — philosophaire_
English
97
203
2K
75.8K
fdgy retweetledi
Jake Chervinsky
Jake Chervinsky@jchervinsky·
When I introduce HPC to people who don't know crypto, I ask "have you ever heard of perpetual derivatives?" Almost all say no. These are sophisticated people, often deep in the financial services world, but they still don't know perps are about to eat global finance. So early.
English
19
26
311
46.8K
fdgy retweetledi
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
“people didn't used to be able to send money on evenings or weekends”
Brian Armstrong tweet media
English
379
791
7.8K
297.2K