Jason Ferber

@_joeycunha @TheFarmStrength It’s more interesting that I never accused you of clout chasing or tried to discredit your methods. Ive studied Motor Preferences for 3 years been to 4 different certifications and performed assessments on 30 players and 7 current Big Leaguers but im sure youre more educated lol

It’s interesting to hear accusations of clout chasing and lack of research from someone who isn’t actively working with athletes or coming from a foundation of formal study in the field. If I were chasing clout, I’d be following trends instead of challenging them. The terms I use aren’t for show—they reflect years of study, research, and daily application. Perhaps that’s why they sound unfamiliar to someone without the same background.

Recently, I’ve had multiple people reaching out through DMs and other channels of communication—folks with years of study in motor preference—sharing their perspectives. A key point that keeps coming up in these conversations is their disagreement with how others in the space, especially as motor preference becomes more popular, are applying or packaging it. Some feel it’s being misapplied or overly simplified, often sold as the ‘way’ to train, when in reality, it’s just one part of a broader approach that should be combined with other elements. This recurring theme is that while you can categorize the body however you’d like, how you apply that understanding into a training philosophy is a whole different challenge. And this is where we are in agreement. It’s not about whether motor preference is valid—it’s about how it’s being applied. Not everyone who studies it or teaches it applies it in the same way, and that’s the important distinction. These conversations have been exactly what I was hoping for—where we dive into differing viewpoints and explore how to best use these ideas. Now, when it comes to the term misinformation, we have to be careful. Too often, we label something as misinformation because we feel our ideas are based on facts and the other person’s ideas aren’t. The truth is, we all have different pieces of the puzzle, and while some may have more pieces than others, that doesn’t mean we should dismiss differing views as ‘misinformation’ just because they don’t align with our own. Labeling everything that disagrees with us as misinformation is a dangerous way to approach conversations, especially if we want to make progress and bring people on board with our ideas. It shuts down dialogue and stops us from having productive discussions. If every disagreement is met with ‘this is misinformation,’ we miss out on the opportunity to learn, collaborate, and move forward in a more meaningful way.

@_joeycunha @TheFarmStrength You don’t have to be an expert in human movement to recognize random coaches trying to sound smart and chase clout. Its so obvious lol.

@ferber_jason @TheFarmStrength I was waiting for the real expert in human movement to jump in.

@GowagsKyle CONGRATULATIONS to my homegirl Grace “The Showstopper” 🤸🏼

Senior Night for my daughter. Love ya Wee!!! 💪

@GowagsKyle Man this is so key because for some reason the world now tends to judge people’s entire character and level of knowledge off a 30 second sm clip lol

A video explaining THE LONG GAME vs. THE SHORT GAME. What model do you practice?

@GowagsKyle I tied my 1 year old son’s throwing hand behind his back to practice… until my neighbor called child protective services on me. Bottom line is it wasn’t illegal, just frowned upon, so we’re back at it.

I just saw a 9u 2B catch a pop up with one hand. No one corrected him. 👏👏👏 #LearnToPlayOneHanded