

Fernando
7K posts

@fertej9
Veterinario y Doctor en reproducción animal. Ahora trabajando en el Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Emigrado de la España vaciada. 🇺🇦






October 2022: Nature Medicine publishes the most comprehensive red meat analysis ever conducted. Global Burden of Disease study. 204 countries. 30 years of data. This study did what previous research refused: account for healthy user bias. What's healthy user bias? People who avoid red meat also exercise more, smoke less, drink less, eat more vegetables, see doctors regularly, higher income, better education. Previous studies compared "red meat eaters" to "avoiders" without controlling for these lifestyle clusters. They weren't comparing meat to no meat. They were comparing healthy lifestyle to unhealthy lifestyle. The 2022 study controlled for these factors. Isolated red meat from lifestyle package. Results: Unprocessed red meat showed NO significant association with: - Heart disease - Stroke - Type 2 diabetes - Colorectal cancer Conclusion: "No robust evidence for health risks from unprocessed red meat." The correlation used to demonize red meat for 50 years disappears when you control for lifestyle. Media coverage: Essentially none. Largest dietary analysis ever published. In Nature Medicine. One of the most prestigious journals. Buried. Why? Because it destroys the foundation of plant-based advocacy. Contradicts dietary guidelines. Suggests 50 years of warnings were based on confounded correlation. Two consecutive years of comprehensive global analyses showing red meat is fine after proper controls. Both largely ignored. Compare to any weak observational study showing correlation. Those get headlines. The 2022 study should have ended the debate. Instead it disappeared while your doctor still tells you to limit red meat based on 1980s epidemiology. The study exists. You can read it. Then watch guidelines ignore it completely.























