Farshad Ghodoosi

496 posts

Farshad Ghodoosi banner
Farshad Ghodoosi

Farshad Ghodoosi

@fghodoosi

Associate Professor of Business Law at Nazarian College of Business & Economics, California State University, Northridge. @YaleLawSch alumnus.

Los Angeles, CA Katılım Mayıs 2010
4.5K Takip Edilen889 Takipçiler
Farshad Ghodoosi
Farshad Ghodoosi@fghodoosi·
While many accounts have been closed here and continue to be closed, one cannot help but be reminded of Musk's self-proclaimed title of 'free speech absolutist."
English
0
0
0
35
Reza Ramezannejad
Reza Ramezannejad@rrghadi01·
محدود شدم! یه #پاینده_ایران این زیر مهمونم کنین لطفا!
فارسی
260
47
455
5.5K
Farshad Ghodoosi
Farshad Ghodoosi@fghodoosi·
As scary as it looks, we have seemingly entered a world where nothing can be resolved through negotiations. First, international law became less relevant or irrelevant altogether — and now diplomacy. Perhaps they eroded in tandem. Whatever the case, the world is headed to a dangerous place.
English
0
0
1
79
Farshad Ghodoosi
Farshad Ghodoosi@fghodoosi·
In an ironic twist, to save the US dollar's hegemony, the US needs to lift some or all sanctions on Iran. Otherwise, the petrodollar system will keep crumbling.
English
0
0
0
63
Farshad Ghodoosi
Farshad Ghodoosi@fghodoosi·
Here is a fact check of Grok by another AI (paid version): 1/5 Fact-checking @grok's take on the Iran deal 🧵 Grok sided with Javadi but got some key facts wrong in the process. 2/5 ❌ Grok says sanctions relief "unlocked ~$100B+" for Iran to spend. Misleading. Iran's own central bank said only ~$29–32B was actually accessible. Much of the $100B+ figure was illiquid, in Chinese project accounts, or held in currencies Iran couldn't easily convert. The U.S. Treasury put the usable liquid assets at ~$50B. 3/5 ⚠️ Grok says missiles were excluded "by design, as Obama negotiators prioritized that." Half-true at best. China, Russia & Iran all blocked missile restrictions from being included. It wasn't Obama's solo call — including missiles would have collapsed the multilateral deal entirely. 4/5 ⚠️ Grok validates the JCPOA→Oct. 7 "resource flow" connection, then says there's "no ironclad straight line." That's contradictory. Iran spent roughly the same $2–3B/year on proxies before AND during the deal, per Trump's own administration estimates. 5/5 Bottom line: Grok gave a more nuanced answer than Javadi but still repeated the inflated $100B figure uncritically and glossed over why missiles were excluded. Framing those as pro-Javadi points without caveats is sloppy analysis, not fact-checking. (spoiler: I would listen to IR experts who have been working on these issues and have written books.)
Sina Azodi@Azodiac83

I’m sure the finance professor is well qualified to discuss nuclear proliferation .

English
1
0
2
141
Farshad Ghodoosi retweetledi
Armina Arm
Armina Arm@ArminaArm·
Niccolò Machiaveli : "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbor is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenseless against the angry neighbor, and you are destroyed." [The Prince]
Armina Arm tweet media
English
1
22
114
16.5K
Farshad Ghodoosi
Farshad Ghodoosi@fghodoosi·
How many households have we turned into this? Does anyone ever ask?
Farshad Ghodoosi tweet media
English
0
0
2
53
Farshad Ghodoosi
Farshad Ghodoosi@fghodoosi·
حجت تمام شد. البته سالهاست تمام است. برای آنهایی که می اندیشند. چقدر تحت فشار بودیم. از همه جا. آنهایی که به سادگی می گفتند به وطن بیاندیشید. به تمدنتان.
Farshad Ghodoosi tweet media
فارسی
0
0
3
62
Farshad Ghodoosi
Farshad Ghodoosi@fghodoosi·
I am an animal from the Stone Age whose civilization is about to get obliterated. All the while you have lectured me all my life about morality, laws, and democratic values.
English
0
0
1
39