Fiifi Appiah

6.1K posts

Fiifi Appiah banner
Fiifi Appiah

Fiifi Appiah

@fiifis_app

Problems exist because there are solutions.

Ghana Katılım Eylül 2019
504 Takip Edilen692 Takipçiler
KwekuTooSweet😋💦
KwekuTooSweet😋💦@KasoaThug·
@eddie_wrt This is so childish! How can you record a personal conversation without the person’s approval for clout chasing
English
3
0
21
4.1K
EDHUB🌍ℹ
EDHUB🌍ℹ@eddie_wrt·
“I’m currently pursuing my master’s degree and I am on contract as a general TA. I have good plans for you concerning your CGPA.” - A female student at UEW shares details of a phone conversation with a Teaching Assistant.
English
75
150
1.6K
179.3K
Madina boi 🇬🇭🇨🇦
Madina boi 🇬🇭🇨🇦@BankNote_KK·
My question is does making a circular music make one a demon or what ?🤦‍♂️
English
1
0
1
658
Madina boi 🇬🇭🇨🇦
Madina boi 🇬🇭🇨🇦@BankNote_KK·
🚨I won't lie, it will be very difficult for me to do a song with @sarkodie if he ask for a collaboration - YAW SIKI
English
13
11
263
14.6K
fictitious
fictitious@fictitiousfruit·
@dom_lucre This Victor guy seems like a genuine and, not in a literal sense at the moment, very down to Earth kinda guy. His response to being on the mission is solid. I like him.
English
2
6
412
16.9K
Dom Lucre | Stealer of Narratives
🔥🚨JUST IN: NASA astronaut Victor Glover was spotted playing with the Rise plush toy as the rest of the crew answers questions from the press. Rise was gifted them by an 8-year-old to indicate that Artemis II has left orbit when the plushie floats.
English
379
1.3K
42.9K
5M
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
Kwarteng: Stop after the taxi line. You had the knockout. The personal attack gave her a way out she didn't deserve. The best argument needs no insult.
English
0
1
1
5
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
How should they have argued? Nana Aba: Lead with the procurement fact. Acknowledge the institutional limits of her analogy. Stay clean.
English
1
1
1
4
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
Fallacies identified: Nana Aba → False Analogy (personal ≠ state) + Ad Hominem Kwarteng → Ad Hominem (unnecessary, he had already won) Kwarteng won on logic. Nana Aba won the emotional room. Neither won cleanly. Both had what they needed to end it and both chose ego.
English
1
1
1
6
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
She did add one factual point: "The aircraft has already been procured. Delivery has been delayed." If true, this changes everything. It means the brother's jet was never a replacement being considered. But she buried it at the end of a rant instead of leading with it.
English
1
1
1
4
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
Nana Aba fires back: "You've never exactly been the brightest bulb in the room." "Still a square peg in a round hole." She never addressed the taxi argument. She never refuted the Jubilee House logic. She never answered why her principle only applies to wealthy siblings
English
1
1
1
2
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
After a near-perfect counter, Kwarteng ended with: "A familiar hallmark of political opportunist... Woman of Valor indeed!" He had won logically. Then he committed Ad Hominem, attacking the person instead of continuing to dismantle the argument. That one line handed her an EER
English
1
1
1
3
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
Reductio ad Absurdum works like this: Accept your opponent's premise as true → follow it to its logical end → show the conclusion is absurd → the original premise collapses. Kwarteng did this cleanly. Nana Aba had no answer for it. Then he made a mistake.
English
1
1
1
4
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
Then came the killer line: "Any future president whose sibling owns a taxi instead of a jet should prepare for diplomatic missions via commercial taxi. After all, consistency is key." He exposed the real problem with her argument, it only works when the sibling is rich.🎯
English
1
1
1
2
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
Kwarteng responds, He doesn't attack her. He takes her logic and follows it to its conclusion: "Perhaps the President should vacate Jubilee House and operate from his brother's office." "Maybe forgo his salary and draw allowances" This is called Reductio ad Absurdum. ⚖️
English
1
1
1
3
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
A president using a private citizen's jet even a brother's raises real questions: → Who controls access to the aircraft? → What if the relationship sours? → Is it auditable as state expenditure? → Does it create a conflict of interest? The analogy was logically thin.
English
1
1
1
2
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
The debate: Should President Mahama use his brother Ibrahim Mahama's private jet instead of procuring a new one for the state? Speaker 1: Nana Aba Anamoah Speaker 2: Kwasi Kwarteng
English
1
1
1
3
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi
If Right, Why Fight?
If Right, Why Fight?@ifrightwhyfight·
Nana Aba opens: If my blood sibling owns a Rolls Royce, would I feel safer in it than a rented one? Would it make sense to rent when his RR is available? Sounds reasonable. Relatable even. But here's the problem, she just compared personal decision-making to state governance
English
1
1
1
1
Fiifi Appiah retweetledi