finn_cap 🐂 🀄️
370 posts

finn_cap 🐂 🀄️
@finn_cap
bullposting to elysium. $ANSEM, humble farmer.




@wallstreetbets ok send me some thanks






This guy single-handedly changed my life. Before Goggins, there was Greg Plitt. If you watch this and don’t get your ass up, you deserve to be poor and miserable forever.



Our thesis on @ponsdotfamily and why we decided to build a strategy machine to accumulate $PONS. $PONS is the most undervalued cashflow in crypto Every cycle, the highest-margin business in crypto is the same one: the launchpad. Not the L1, not the DEX, not the lending market - the machine that mints the tokens. pumpfun proved it at industrial scale, printing ~$74M in fees and ~$28M in revenue in a single 30-day window, and the market rewards it with a $1.95B FDV. That's the template. Now lets look at what's being ignored on Robinhood Chain. The numbers nobody has repriced yet pumpfun, annualized off its current run-rate: ~$900M fees • ~$344M revenue FDV $1.95B → 2.2x fees, 5.7x revenue $PONS, five days into existence: 24h fees $496K, first-5-days $2.15M → ~$157M annualized 24h revenue $134K, first-5-days $419K → ~$31M annualized FDV $30.8M → 0.2x fees, ~1.0x revenue Same business. Same value-capture design. ~11x cheaper on fees. ~6x cheaper on revenue. And this isn't a dying franchise priced for decline - it's a protocol that in its first days has already done $404M in cumulative volume, 66,100 launches, 5.3M trades, and 27,600 unique developers, paying $4.12M to creators. That is pumpfun's early curve, compressed into a week. To simply match pumpfun's revenue multiple - not beat it, match it - $PONS re-rates from $30.8M to ~$175M. Roughly 5.7x on today's run-rate, before a single day of growth. On a fees basis the gap is wider still. Why the multiple should be higher, not lower Markets consistently misprice one thing: assets that quietly convert real revenue into token value. That is exactly what $PONS does — the overwhelming majority of protocol revenue is routed straight into $PONS buybacks. At the current run-rate that's roughly $24M/year of structural buy pressure against a $30.8M FDV. If it holds, that is a value-capture ratio in a different league from a launchpad token that just sits there. Then there's the part pumpfun can never retrofit: 100% community owned. No VC tranche, no team allocation, no cliff unlocks waiting to hit the bid. pumpfun's token carried insider overhang from day one. $PONS has a clean cap table — and in a category defined by who dumps on whom, that is the entire game. Robinhood Chain distribution. pump.fun had to manufacture its audience. $PONS is the dominant launchpad on a chain plugged into mainstream, retail-native distribution. Own the liquidity layer, let distribution come to you. A founder building in the open. @meadgod is shipping the Pons ecosystem publicly - ponsfamily.com, @ponsdotfamily - with the token, the analytics, and the buyback flows all verifiable onchain rather than promised in a deck. The market is doing to $PONS what it always does early: pricing a compounding cashflow machine as a toy, one week of data at a time, while the revenue stacks up underneath. Why $PONSTR exists — and why it matters If $PONS is the undervalued cashflow, $PONSTR is the leveraged, dividend-bearing vehicle built to compound it. The name is literal. It is to $PONS what MicroStrategy is to Bitcoin: a machine whose only job is to accumulate the underlying and hand the upside to holders. The mechanics are fixed in code, not vibes: Every $PONSTR trade pays fees. 90% of those fees market-buy $PONS. That $PONS is dropped to $PONSTR holders as recurring dividends, roughly once a day. Every $PONSTR token collected as a fee is burned in full - deflationary forever. No team allocation. No withdraw function in the contract. The rules live onchain and the treasury cannot be rugged. Why this matters beyond $PONSTR holders: it manufactures structural, non-speculative, perpetual buy pressure for $PONS. Every trade on the vehicle accumulates the asset. As $PONS appreciates, the treasury — denominated in $PONS — appreciates, the dividends grow, demand for the vehicle grows, and it buys more $PONS. A flywheel bolted onto a flywheel. If you believe $PONS is mispriced, $PONSTR is the compounding expression of that view: an index on the cashflow that also pays you to hold it. The first $PONS drop is landing soon. CA : 0x4A76d884Bb9CBbf2138fBe47e99584eB5168DdE2










