
FireDeBoerToday
146 posts









Deeply disappointed in the Tuscaloosa court’s denial of Charles Bediako’s request for an injunction against the NCAA. This ruling ignores that an athlete’s NIL value is directly tied to his ability to play, overlooks that NCAA rules do not distinguish between athletes with prior college experience and those without, and contrasts with eligibility grants to many other former pros. We fight on for fairness.


Nate Oats on his radio show about Charles Bediako ruling: "Super disappointed. Disappointed in the whole thing." "I thought the courts would see the inconsistency in the rulings."


Alabama says in a statement they are "disappointed" in the ruling: "The NCAA has granted eligibility to over 100 current men’s basketball players with prior professional experience in the G League or overseas. Granting eligibility to some former professionals, and not to others, is what creates the havoc we are currently in and why consistency from decision-makers is so desperately needed."








I absolutely hate this for Charles, but this is really good for college basketball

BREAKING: A Tuscaloosa judge has *denied* Charles Bediako’s motion for a preliminary injunction to allow him to continue playing for Alabama, per court docs @aldotcom obtained.





When the Pack Reed Propaganda works


March 8th 2025….@thewarrapport @Zblackerby @AuburnMemes









